Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Ambiguous Results from "Socionics Type Assistant Test"

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Ambiguous Results from "Socionics Type Assistant Test"

    The link to the results of the test can be found at the following link:
    http://www.socionics.com/sta/sta_turbo_xl.html?I83S3T77x0.

    The results would seem to indicate a personality type of I?T?. I would imagine that this is due to the nature of the test rather than an accurate description of my personality type, which is somewhat to be expected. Any thoughts on the matter?

    Ryan M.

  2. #2
    Azeroffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    California
    TIM
    ENTj 3w4 sp/sx
    Posts
    2,216
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That test is really shitty.

    try these:

    Mizami: Registreer jezelf nu!

    Socionics

    Also, just use them as starting point for figuring out your type because even these aren't completely accurate.
    3w4-5w6-9w8

  3. #3
    when you see the booty Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    everywhere at once
    Posts
    8,449
    Mentioned
    203 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah, that test is basically MBTI disguised with a lowercase letter.
    "And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl

    http://forum.socionix.com/
    It's pretty cool

  4. #4
    JuJu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    2,704
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yeah, it blows... unfortunately there aren't any accurate Socionics type tests...

    in socionics, it's best to try to find out your own type, or have someone who knows Socionics (the Model A version) type you

  5. #5
    jughead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NC
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    883
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm going to channel phaedrus and say tests do work, even mbti ones. They are the best:the most accurate way combined with self typing from reading descriptions and testing your closest/best friends. I have NEVER had a test NOT give me INFP. Never.OK ONCE I GOT INTP AND ENFP.
    Typing yourself through other people that are "experts" is the hardest, least useful way because that would be expensive and time consuming given the current state of socionics. Consider the forum you demean. And the experts are not experts either:they usually rely on tests in some part, and they are generally Russian.
    However I would be glad to have Rick or you type me JuJu as a matter of "professional" opionion. That way I can have merit and say I've been professionally typed. It is only because of tests that I arrived here and was able to glean any useful information. Tests=good heiuristic and advertising/availability tool. 50% is better than 6.25% by a long shot. So is 25%. We all know what the "good test"s are and which ones to use. Promote those. I'm not talking about the 5 question test or the shitty type assistant turbo.

    IF the Russian community is so far ahead why the hell aren't they making bank? Dating sites,simple team building, useful people databases etc.
    I'm utterly dissatisfied with the current state, if I was person in any position of power at a university I would requests my students do some basic tests for it. As such I am extremely lazy, cannot find like minded people, terrible at Te:how to go about it blah blah and would rather suggest to said person in power. That is in a baby nutshell why I self type IEI by analysis.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •