I recommend that people who aren't satisfied with the understanding of Socionics proffered here, at the16types.info, (e.g. Clint Eastwood = Delta; Christian Bale = Alpha, etc.)
Check out the Socionics Workshop
Currently, there's not as much conversation there as here... BUT there are a couple of people there who understand Model A Socionics, which is good.
Hopefully some people who genuinely want to learn Model A Socionics will go there... (I know that some people come to this site for the social aspect or w/e--but lol that's pretty lame... Get "IRL"s.)
I've been coming to this website hoping to discuss Model A Socionics... Instead I've been getting stuff like "you have to keep an open-mind to [e.g. Clint Eastwood is Si valuing.]" and "You have to keep an open mind to [the whole misconception of Socionics built around misunderstandings like that, by Ashton, Steve, Nick, etc].
Whatever it is, it's not Model A Socionics--and I've kept an open-mind, kept trying it out--and in my experience, it doesn't work... (Thus I'm not interested in discussing anymore... I'd rather discuss the Socionics that I've found works, which is the Model A, Russian version.
Nothing against Ashton et al, but I've realized it's impossible to reach an understanding of Socionics with people who are coming at it from that angle, i.e. from Non-Model A = correct... We don't agree on what means what.
(Someone should take "Model A" off of the headings of each of these galleries.)
(FTR, in the russian version of Socionics, both Clint Eastwood and Christian Bale are Se valuing. IMO, LSIs. That's in the Beta quadra, beginners.)