Adele Adkins
Okay, so I've been listening to Adele lately, and I'm looking for opinions for her type. I'm getting a victim vibe from her. Especially her song "My Same" makes me think of duality and victim-aggressor relationships. Some sample lyrics:
Also, "If I'm wrong I am right" seems like an Ni-style paradox, no? Honestly, my guess for her is ILI, but Fe polr for a singer seems pretty odd, so maybe IEI or EIE? Anyway, opinions?
Last edited by silke; 10-01-2017 at 08:29 AM. Reason: added videos
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
Never heard of her so I won't throw rocks, at least not now, but here is a thread that didn't go far: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ad.php?t=28463
Dead obvious ISxj.
i dont know much about her but she has a cool voice and she stood out to me when i read an interview where she talked about grossing out her mom by picking her nose and for some reason that made me like her, like she was bold enough to just nonchalantly talk about that haha.
thanks labcoat. is there anything in particular you can point to to support that?
ISFx
Updated typing: Se-SEE
Enneagram type: 2w3 sp/so, also considered sx/sp and so/sx but these didn't fit her as well, while she's definitely syn-chain.
Last edited by silke; 10-28-2016 at 09:12 PM.
Lol I'm trying to imagine an ILI victim. xD I'm sure they exist; I guess it just amuses me for some reason.
And if I'm not mistaken someone seems a little obsessed.
The mind is restless and difficult to restrain, but it is subdued by practice
-Krishna
when i first heard her music my mind sort of instantly wanted to settle on an ISxj typing; something about the monotony (in the value-neutral sense) of her melodies and the firmness of the voice in which she sings them.
idk what that's worth. probably not a lot. but i offer it as my 2 cents for now.
SEE
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She dared sing a whole song out of tune on a live show. I fucking hate her.
(No, I didn't pay for tickets and am not a disappointed fan.)
Reason is a whore.
wait, what?
SHE'S BETTER THAN NICKI MINAJ, MUTHAFUCKAS.
Therein lies the tragedy. I'm sure Adele has some nice songs too but surely we can do better.Originally Posted by blackburry
It's because she's black.
Reason is a whore.
NO YOU.
She sang "skyfall" and I dedicated it to a forum member I like; that's all that matters to me
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
A) I like that his palm were sweaty.
B) I'm going to start singing to kids instead of talking to them. I want money.
C) and guys...Nicki friggin Minaj. she's horrible. she nasty.and also justin beieber.
and also also selana gomez. and also also also... lindsay lohan.
You realise that scraping the bottom of the barrel so hard you're picking up dirt, to compare her to, isn't a good thing?
Reason is a whore.
Hey, she's fat.You realise that scraping the bottom of the barrel so hard you're picking up dirt, to compare her to, isn't a good thing?
*Edit* I'm kidding. I think she's fine. but I thought that was a funny reply..
Reason is a whore.
All i can say is that Iher voice.It feels like a velvety blanket being wrapped around me.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
SEE
sx/so 7w6 714
I*FP
Seems SEE
~* astralsilky
Each essence is a separate glass,
Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
A thousand colors, but the Light is One.
Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet
Post types & fully individuated before 2012 ...
I always thought SEE, maybe SEE-H?
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
