Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 50 of 50

Thread: Hypothetical DCNH subtype descriptions

  1. #41
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,206
    Mentioned
    335 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    EII creative. Well, I suppose the emphasis would be in their internal worlds, imagination and bringing it out in some ways. I suppose being a writer, an artist etc... The end result if everything goes well would be bit Se-ish (aka gaining recognition).
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  2. #42
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,804
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This thread is simply awful. Those descriptions were not meant for DCNH. This is an attempt at discrediting socionics.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  3. #43
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,206
    Mentioned
    335 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    So I have been deciphering Gulenko scriptures. In order to gain some calibration points and better understanding of variation.

    It appears, although indirectly, that DCNH subtypes are attached to supervision ring.

    For example:
    ILE-D is ILE (identity) subtype of ILE
    ILE-C would be LSI (supervisee) subtype of ILE
    ILE-N would be SEE (super-ego) subtype of ILE
    ILE-H would be EII (supervisor) subtype of ILE

    Which is in better logical harmony than saying H subtype is reminiscent of conflictor. This one would be also connected to cognitive styles.

    [Which makes me rethink of my subtype. Because I might have inclination towards Dostoevsky stuff while Dreiser stuff seems very off]
    Last edited by The Reality Denialist; 02-19-2018 at 05:35 PM.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  4. #44
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,921
    Mentioned
    221 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    This is complete hogwash. You can't split the two Socionics subtypes descriptions into four DCNH descriptions.
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  5. #45
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,206
    Mentioned
    335 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raver View Post
    This is complete hogwash. You can't split the two Socionics subtypes descriptions into four DCNH descriptions.
    What about supervision ring subtypes?
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  6. #46
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,921
    Mentioned
    221 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Troll Nr 007 View Post
    What about supervision ring subtypes?
    Seems interesting. I am not sure what to make of it yet tbh.
    Last edited by Raver; 02-19-2018 at 06:31 PM.
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  7. #47
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I feel like you're onto something with the supervision ring thing. it makes sense to me on a gut level

  8. #48
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    1,134
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Troll Nr 007 View Post
    So I have been deciphering Gulenko scriptures. In order to gain some calibration points and better understanding of variation.

    It appears, although indirectly, that DCNH subtypes are attached to supervision ring.

    For example:
    ILE-D is ILE (identity) subtype of ILE
    ILE-C would be LSI (supervisee) subtype of ILE
    ILE-N would be SEE (super-ego) subtype of ILE
    ILE-H would be EII (supervisor) subtype of ILE

    Which is in better logical harmony than saying H subtype is reminiscent of conflictor. This one would be also connected to cognitive styles.

    [Which makes me rethink of my subtype. Because I might have inclination towards Dostoevsky stuff while Dreiser stuff seems very off]
    I'm not sure I see the point to all this, that is; I already know there are differences within types, ie, I don't need 2 subtype, or DCNH to provide an attempt to classify differences within type. Type enough appears sufficient for me just now. But I wanted to like your post and respond to show my appreciation for your Ti, (and Ne) and to say I think you make a pretty good example of ILE.

  9. #49
    Spiritual Advisor Hope's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    Celestial Sli
    Posts
    3,444
    Mentioned
    415 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raver View Post
    This is complete hogwash. You can't split the two Socionics subtypes descriptions into four DCNH descriptions.
    True, the description for subtype in here for SLI is in reality the one and the one is , so how that can make any sense?

    They dont even match the IEs traits. is not mobile or likes to change impressions. And how on earth subtype would be less operational, gregarious and humanitarian?
    Last edited by Hope; 02-19-2018 at 11:11 PM.

  10. #50
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Troll Nr 007 View Post
    So I have been deciphering Gulenko scriptures. In order to gain some calibration points and better understanding of variation.

    It appears, although indirectly, that DCNH subtypes are attached to supervision ring.

    For example:
    ILE-D is ILE (identity) subtype of ILE
    ILE-C would be LSI (supervisee) subtype of ILE
    ILE-N would be SEE (super-ego) subtype of ILE
    ILE-H would be EII (supervisor) subtype of ILE

    Which is in better logical harmony than saying H subtype is reminiscent of conflictor. This one would be also connected to cognitive styles.

    [Which makes me rethink of my subtype. Because I might have inclination towards Dostoevsky stuff while Dreiser stuff seems very off]
    This rings true. Would explain why I have been typed INFp by some people. Will try to observe if it works.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •