Conflict relations: which subtype of your conflictor is worse?

[The Exception]

The majority seem to agree that duals where both members subtypes correspond to the accepting function or to the creative function are better than when one member has an accepting subtype and the other has a creative subtype.

But what about conflictors? Is one subtype worse than another?

I'm an LII-Ne (creative subtype) and after reading the SEE subtype descriptions, I'd probably find the SEE-Se (accepting) more problematic than the SEE-Fi although I think I'd have a lot of problems with both. Is it subtype related or would LIIs of both subtypes be more likely to choose SEE-Se as the worst one since the subtype is LII's PoLR?

[1981slater]

At worst, ESIs can be unpleasant for me, but I'd give the golden medal to unhealthy SLEs and SEEs

[Not A Communist Shill]

I believe myself to be an Ne-subtype. The SEE-Se subtype seems too much too handle, while at least with the Fi subtype I get the impression I would be able to keep my distance more, and perhaps the Fi subtype would be more inclined to have attributes I would like somewhat.

...in theory .

[Jarno]

The majority seem to agree that duals where both members subtypes correspond to the accepting function or to the creative function are better than when one member has an accepting subtype and the other has a creative subtype.

But what about conflictors? Is one subtype worse than another?

I'm an LII-Ne (creative subtype) and after reading the SEE subtype descriptions, I'd probably find the SEE-Se (accepting) more problematic than the SEE-Fi although I think I'd have a lot of problems with both. Is it subtype related or would LIIs of both subtypes be more likely to choose SEE-Se as the worst one since the subtype is LII's PoLR?

I had most trouble's and tension with the 'different subtype', in my case the ESE-Fe

[redbaron]

I dunno if I have a subtype--I think of myself as Ni-sub but I feel like I'm more balanced now than I used to be. Anyway, I don't think I could say one way or the other since I've never gotten close enough to a conflictor to know. My guess would be that I'd have a harder time with LSE-Te

[Jarno]

I think of myself as Ni-sub

yes

[Trevor]

The same sex subtype.

[silverchris9]

Si sub. All day long and twice on Sunday. At least Te subtype focuses their irritating efficiency more on useful things. Unnecessary focus on efficiency PLUS obsession with boring physical objects and cleanliness? No gracias. I think of myself as Fe-sub. Wikisocion says they can be more jocular, but I feel like that would just cause us to butt heads more...

[717495]

Fe-ESEs are witches who honestly want to paralyze you with their hideous screeching laughter and then destroy you from the inside out with their smelly-ass hugs. From this I've come to realize that Fe PoLRs are simply types with sensitive ears and heathily breathing skin.