Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Conflict relations: which subtype of your conflictor is worse?

  1. #1
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,108
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default Conflict relations: which subtype of your conflictor is worse?

    The majority seem to agree that duals where both members subtypes correspond to the accepting function or to the creative function are better than when one member has an accepting subtype and the other has a creative subtype.

    But what about conflictors? Is one subtype worse than another?

    I'm an LII-Ne (creative subtype) and after reading the SEE subtype descriptions, I'd probably find the SEE-Se (accepting) more problematic than the SEE-Fi although I think I'd have a lot of problems with both. Is it subtype related or would LIIs of both subtypes be more likely to choose SEE-Se as the worst one since the subtype is LII's PoLR?
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  2. #2
    ILE - ENTp 1981slater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spain
    TIM
    ILE (ENTp)
    Posts
    4,866
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    At worst, ESIs can be unpleasant for me, but I'd give the golden medal to unhealthy SLEs and SEEs
    ILE "Searcher"
    Socionics: ENTp
    DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
    Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
    MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
    Astrological sign: Aquarius

    To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.

  3. #3
    Landlord of the Dog and Duck Subteigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    EII-Ne Sp/So
    Posts
    14,936
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I believe myself to be an Ne-subtype. The SEE-Se subtype seems too much too handle, while at least with the Fi subtype I get the impression I would be able to keep my distance more, and perhaps the Fi subtype would be more inclined to have attributes I would like somewhat.

    ...in theory .

  4. #4
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,375
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by warrior-librarian View Post
    The majority seem to agree that duals where both members subtypes correspond to the accepting function or to the creative function are better than when one member has an accepting subtype and the other has a creative subtype.

    But what about conflictors? Is one subtype worse than another?

    I'm an LII-Ne (creative subtype) and after reading the SEE subtype descriptions, I'd probably find the SEE-Se (accepting) more problematic than the SEE-Fi although I think I'd have a lot of problems with both. Is it subtype related or would LIIs of both subtypes be more likely to choose SEE-Se as the worst one since the subtype is LII's PoLR?
    I had most trouble's and tension with the 'different subtype', in my case the ESE-Fe

  5. #5
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,321
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I dunno if I have a subtype--I think of myself as Ni-sub but I feel like I'm more balanced now than I used to be. Anyway, I don't think I could say one way or the other since I've never gotten close enough to a conflictor to know. My guess would be that I'd have a harder time with LSE-Te
    IEI-Fe 4w3

  6. #6
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,375
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron View Post
    I think of myself as Ni-sub
    yes

  7. #7
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,860
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Which subtype of your conflictor is worse?

    The same sex subtype.
    Last edited by Trevor; 11-05-2009 at 04:40 PM.

  8. #8
    wants to be a writer. silverchris9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,107
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Si sub. All day long and twice on Sunday. At least Te subtype focuses their irritating efficiency more on useful things. Unnecessary focus on efficiency PLUS obsession with boring physical objects and cleanliness? No gracias. I think of myself as Fe-sub. Wikisocion says they can be more jocular, but I feel like that would just cause us to butt heads more...
    Not a rule, just a trend.

    IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.

    Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...

    I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.

  9. #9
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Fe-ESEs are witches who honestly want to paralyze you with their hideous screeching laughter and then destroy you from the inside out with their smelly-ass hugs. From this I've come to realize that Fe PoLRs are simply types with sensitive ears and heathily breathing skin.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •