Sure I'll take a stab at it, right now I am attempting to learn the jungian functions....
So....
is concerned about the
immediate impression being experienced.
This is a more complicated issue. To find meaning in this statement, consider Te vs. Ti. Te is an abstraction; a relation between two things. This relationship can exist in many different scenarios. It is originally observed in a single situation. However, the same observations can exist in new situations. Ti is a relational network. This network is specific to a situation. No network will coherently match up with any other network. However, every network adheres to the same principles; and it is these principles which Ti experiences. The same applies to Fi & Fe. So in one sense, Fe is immediate; it is derived from the immediate; but in another sense it is abstract; it can be applied to many different situations
is concerned about the
inner value they appraise something with.
Both are emotional/feeling in nature.
just make it clear the appraisal is secondary to the value. Fi is experienced. Appraising a thing is identifying something outside yourself.
wants to builds connections with people based on the feeling or mood in the air at that moment
This is a particular behavior sometimes associated with Fe. Many Fe types do not do this. Identifying a function based on behavior can be confusing
wants to build connections with people based on common ground, sharing similar ideals of value/meaning
It is important to specify what you mean by common ground. Is common ground considered internal and experience based, or worldly and identifiable? I have common ground with the people I work with. The other day we had a rude customer, and I felt common ground with my fellow employees, rallied against the bastard. I also feel common ground with a security guard at the gate, although I don't know anything about him. I can't particularly say why
naturally hone in on what the feeling being experienced in the moment is
evaluate the experience of the moment based on a measuring it to their personal conception of value/meaning develop through feeling
If you look at these two definitions, they say the same thing in reverse order. You have to consider the first point I made if you are attaching words like experience and moment vs. abstraction with Fe & Fi. Both functions have both qualities. Statements like the ones you make here need to be further qualified. I think Fe derives itself from the moment, and generalizes as an abstraction; where Fi derives itself from the person, as an abstraction, and is then applied to the moment. Considering this sort of duality: as functions have meaning when paired with other functions, every type will experience all 8 functions. Some they experience in a secondary, backwards fashion. Anyway, it is possible you are identifying your Fe in terms of your Ti, and seeing it as Fi.
exhibits bubbly, nice, friendly, outgoing, gregarious, enthusiastic behavior due to their pension for feeling in the moment. The proverbial "heart on the sleeves" type.
SEEs can seem very bubbly sometimes. Marilyn Manson is a Fe dominant type. I don't think this is a good way of identifying Fe. I agree Fe types have more concrete emotions. But I have known INFps & ISFps, manifesting their Fe through IP functions; this gives a different impression to the quality of their Fe.
exhibits a more sentimental, value and meaning based type of behavior due to their pension for establish connection to a more internalized feeling. The more "soulful" type.
same criticism as above.. this qualitative observation can only be considered along with a persons other functions