Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: LOOK! PUPPIES!

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,293
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default LOOK! PUPPIES!

    Edited for gayness.
    ENTp

  2. #2
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,921
    Mentioned
    221 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lev Kamensky wrote
    1. Each individual is a combination of all sixteen psychological types (archetypes) in different percentages. If you are 50% INTj and 50% INTp for instance, what it means is that you will act as INTj in 50% of the situations and an INTp in 50 % of the situations.
    In the wonderful thread over here

    I found this quote, which helps explain why so many people may be unsure about their personality type. Maybe, your just a person that is balanced between several types. I'm still unsure about my personaltty types, though I think that there should be a test that takes this into account, I think there is not that sure though.
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  3. #3
    MysticSonic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,993
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That sort of undermines the entire typology.
    "To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"

    "Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."

  4. #4
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,921
    Mentioned
    221 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MysticSonic
    That sort of undermines the entire typology.
    Exactly why I like it so much.
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  5. #5
    Smilingeyes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,228
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MysticSonic
    That sort of undermines the entire typology.
    Why do you think so?

  6. #6
    Cone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,717
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MysticSonic
    That sort of undermines the entire typology.
    And makes it meaningless.
    Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)

  7. #7
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,921
    Mentioned
    221 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cone
    Quote Originally Posted by MysticSonic
    That sort of undermines the entire typology.
    And makes it meaningless.
    It may undermine the entire typology, but the typology is a theory and it isn't at theory that is proven 99.9%. There are theories that are 99.9% plausible such as evolution, though this has yet to be fool proof and there are problems with socionics and MBTI or else people wouldn't be so confused about their types and unique. If you met someone of the same type, then it would mean that person acts exactly like you, which isn't true.
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  8. #8
    MysticSonic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,993
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    "Why do you think so?"

    Because then inter-type relations are left as a rather impractical bumper to the theory rather than leave it as some sort of predictive tool.

    It also undermines the concept that the situation can bring about different effects depending upon a person's functional order, for if the functional order itself is dependant upon the situation, then there could be no correlation---no simply one, anyway.
    "To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"

    "Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."

  9. #9
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    thank you Transigent
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,293
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Edited for gayness.
    ENTp

  11. #11
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,921
    Mentioned
    221 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Transigent
    Quote Originally Posted by Young_and_Confused
    Quote Originally Posted by Lev Kamensky wrote
    1. Each individual is a combination of all sixteen psychological types (archetypes) in different percentages. If you are 50% INTj and 50% INTp for instance, what it means is that you will act as INTj in 50% of the situations and an INTp in 50 % of the situations.
    In the wonderful thread over here

    I found this quote, which helps explain why so many people may be unsure about their personality type. Maybe, your just a person that is balanced between several types. I'm still unsure about my personaltty types, though I think that there should be a test that takes this into account, I think there is not that sure though.
    YOU GOT THE WRONG THREAD DIPSHIT

    KAMENISKY IS IN THE OTHER POST

    ASS
    I know that, that thread just quotes certain things from that specific thread your talking about. :wink:
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,293
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Edited for gayness.
    ENTp

  13. #13
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,921
    Mentioned
    221 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Transigent
    Quote Originally Posted by Young_and_Confused
    I know that, that thread just quotes certain things from that specific thread your talking about. :wink:
    I DONT WANT TO HEAR ABOUT KAMENESKY

    GO AWAY WITH THAT SHIT

    IT IS GAY
    LMAO
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  14. #14
    Smilingeyes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,228
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MysticSonic
    "Why do you think so?"

    Because then inter-type relations are left as a rather impractical bumper to the theory rather than leave it as some sort of predictive tool.

    It also undermines the concept that the situation can bring about different effects depending upon a person's functional order, for if the functional order itself is dependant upon the situation, then there could be no correlation---no simply one, anyway.
    Transigent does have a point. I'll be answering this on that other thread.

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    354
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Young_and_Confused
    There are theories that are 99.9% plausible such as evolution
    Where did you find that number?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •