The central topic of this thread is the implications of this statement:
I see two issues related to Logos's statement: A) I begin to see a pattern of LIIs acting as interpreters; what other types do this? What variety of interpreters would be helpful, in addition to the services Logos and I already provide? B) Logos has deliberately brought his Te, and to a lesser extent his Se, up to scratch. I, on the other hand, have been focusing more on my DS. Are there several areas of specialization that would be helpful here? Pros and cons of various methods that are not really areas of specialization? A pattern of developing elements that would be helpful based on life stages?
LII are almost certain to be handy with and , and passing with , and . From much of Rick's writings, I would have thought that developing the ego is the way to go. However, both Logos and I seem to have the idea that some normally invisible function is worth the trouble to bring up to scratch.