What IM elements do you see when you read this?

[tereg]

'So help me understand them,' pleaded Mack.
'Not much to understand, actually. They just are. They are neither bad nor good; they just exist. Here is something that will help you sort this out in your mind, Mackenzie. Paradigms power perceptions and perceptions power emotions.Most actions are responses to emotions just as most emotions are simply responses to perceptions - what you think is true about a given situation. If your perception is false or based on falsehood, then your emotional response to it will be false and misleading too. So check your perceptions, and beyond that keep checking the truthfulness of your paradigms - what you believe about yourself, other people, and the world. The more you live in the truth, the more your emotions will help you see clearly, vs. distract or impede you. But even then, you don't ever want to trust them more than you trust me.'

-- William P. Young, in The Shack

[Brilliand]

I see mainly . Maybe too, but I think I'm just relating to it. Can't say between Alpha and Delta, really.

I'm not sure what to make of "You don't ever want to trust them more than you trust me." It seems like the dark side of something, maybe or .

[Gilly]

Fi/Te, maybe some Ni.

[tcaudilllg]

Alpha Ti IM discussing Fe data.

[717495]

I know that William Shatner is looking back at me with a tough front.

[leckysupport]

Fi/Te, maybe some Ni.

This.

[tereg]

So here's why I posted this. I was emailed this, and reading it gave me an instant brain-ache (Edit: mainly because it felt incredibly "dense" to me in how it chose to explain the concept it is explaining). I read it and I felt like I had just read gibberish. I couldn't tell you what I just read despite having just read it. I'd have to trudge through that multiple times just to get the gist and the spirit of what it's talking about.

The terminology and language style or prose on the periphery seemed to me, but I wanted to hear what other people said about it because perhaps I'm wrong.