Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: iAnnAu's enneagram type

  1. #1
    Twist-Tie Spider iAnnAu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Knoxhell TN
    Posts
    987
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default iAnnAu's enneagram type

    Just visited 9types.com & took their tests (they have 2). The first one returned 5, 7 and 9 with equal high scores. The second one returned 5 as highest, then 4, with 7 and 9 as the only other positive scores.

    I've taken tests on other sites, and almost always come up with 7, 8 or 9 on them, with some 5s mixed in. But what's intriguing about the 9types site is that they have positive/negative cycle diagrams with short descriptions, and reading through the 9 diagrams, it really sounds like there's no way I could be 4, 6 or 8. Or a 1, 2, or 3, for that matter. That leaves 5, 7 and 9, and neither 5 nor 9 really sound like what motivates me, either through desire (9) or fear (5).

    And yet, the briefness of the descriptions is limiting, because other, more substantial, descriptions reveal 7s to be far more gregarious and fantasizing than I really am. So, the tests aren't reliable, and the descriptions don't match. And neither the 6 nor 8 make sense as wings.

    What is it again about the enneagram that so many people find useful?
    Quote Originally Posted by Charles Bukowski
    We're all going to die, all of us, what a circus! That alone should make us love each other but it doesn't. We are terrorized and flattened by trivialities, we are eaten up by nothing.
    SLI

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iAnnAu View Post
    I've taken tests on other sites, and almost always come up with 7, 8 or 9 on them, with some 5s mixed in. But what's intriguing about the 9types site is that they have positive/negative cycle diagrams with short descriptions, and reading through the 9 diagrams, it really sounds like there's no way I could be 4, 6 or 8. Or a 1, 2, or 3, for that matter. That leaves 5, 7 and 9, and neither 5 nor 9 really sound like what motivates me, either through desire (9) or fear (5).
    I'm most likely 5. But the worldview and fear attributed to 5 didn't fit me at all, and when I read the worldviews, desires and fears of all types, none of them fit me.
    ...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.

    INTp

  3. #3
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iAnnAu View Post
    What is it again about the enneagram that so many people find useful?
    My own opinion is that the enneagram is not useful for everyone; I also think that not all socionics types find it easy to relate to enneatypes (SLI included). Actually being torn between 5 and 9 sounds very SLI-like.

    On that note, I think it is hugely misguided to treat enneagram types as something totally independent from socionics types, that is accomplished only at the cost of reducing socionics types to irrelevancy regarding motivations, which I see as totally wrong-headed and ignorant. Things like, for instance, Te ego types that are also 3; or Se ego types that are also 9, make no sense.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  4. #4
    JuJu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    2,704
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    On that note, I think it is hugely misguided to treat enneagram types as something totally independent from socionics types, that is accomplished only at the cost of reducing socionics types to irrelevancy regarding motivations, which I see as totally wrong-headed and ignorant. Things like, for instance, Te ego types that are also 3; or Se ego types that are also 9, make no sense.

    Very well-put.

    I've noticed what you describe (i.e. the idea that 'enneagram describes my motivations; socionics describes something totally different') has led to Socionics mistypings by proponents of that idea... And they sometimes try to explain away the mistypings by pointing to the etype.

    (I'm not sure about vice versa, i.e. whether it leads to mistypings in etypes, bc frankly they're not my thing, and thus I couldn't tell anyone here with any reasonably correct idea what's wrong or right in that system.)

  5. #5
    Twist-Tie Spider iAnnAu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Knoxhell TN
    Posts
    987
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    Actually being torn between 5 and 9 sounds very SLI-like.
    Ha! Thanks; that actually does make me feel a bit better. I used to be somewhat obsessed with personality-typing sorta things, but because I never did seem to fit any of their boxes, I finally realized that part of the appeal was the ego boost of thinking "I'm so fucking unique!" So at this point in my life, I'd rather focus on insights such things can offer me about how I can better interface with others. I was wondering if I was falling back into my earlier pattern of "A-ha! I didn't fit any of those categories; I mus' be special!"
    Quote Originally Posted by Charles Bukowski
    We're all going to die, all of us, what a circus! That alone should make us love each other but it doesn't. We are terrorized and flattened by trivialities, we are eaten up by nothing.
    SLI

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •