I did not read all of this, but just down through the second day, and stopped partway through the third day of exchanges:
What should science do? Sam Harris v. Philip Ball | The Reason Project
What seems strange is that I have a huge appetite for reading, and both of these guys seem erudite and reasonable. But eventually, I was like "well, that's enough of that." Why'd it burn me out, I wonder ... is it because they're presenting information in more of a Ti than Te way, and I reached my threshold? It also occurred to me that maybe it's more of a quadra thing; maybe each of them addresses their differences in a way that depresses my quadra values?
I dunno. But maybe some of you have your opinions about it, so I thought I'd ask.