David Sedaris
I listened to one of his books on tape almost 4 years ago. At that time I thought of him as EII.Originally Posted by Loki
He's really weird. He does seemish.
Bump
(I love him so much)
I'd love to say Ti-INTj for him.
SLI
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
EIE
Someone said I reminded her of him, but I couldn't exactly find the resemblance. Perhaps it was his sort of nasal way of talking and his rambling on about certain things and what he found strange about them (unless I'm making up that he does this as I don't recall).
XII, I think, leaning EII. Anyway, I adore him. I want to take a trip with him, someplace foreign to us both, so we can have (mis-) adventures while exploring and making amusing observations about the people and experiences we encounter. If my husband came (and I would like for him to, if he would) he would probably join in and find us amusing sometimes, and other times just shake his head at our silliness.
THE IHOP YEARS
"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is." - Yogi Berra
IEE
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
