new project

[Hugo]

Please see the one that applies to you:
INTj + ESFj: http://www.socioniko.net/en/1.3.rels/dual-1j.html
ENTp + ISFp: http://www.socioniko.net/en/1.3.rels/dual-1p.html
ISTj + ENFj: http://www.socioniko.net/en/1.3.rels/dual-2j.html
ESTp + INFp: http://www.socioniko.net/en/1.3.rels/dual-2p.html
ENTj + ISFj: http://www.socioniko.net/en/1.3.rels/dual-3j.html
INTp + ESFj: http://www.socioniko.net/en/1.3.rels/dual-3p.html
ESTj + INFj: http://www.socioniko.net/en/1.3.rels/dual-4j.html
ISTp + ENFp: http://www.socioniko.net/en/1.3.rels/dual-4p.html

Now pick out the sentence that makes your dual relationship worthwhile for you only.

Please also state your type.

Hopefully I will get all 16 types and a total of 16 sentences - one for eac type.

Thanks

[Slacker]

Hard choice but I'll go with this:

The Craftsman creates convenience and comfort for The Psychologist, who is not much adapted to the real life, thus giving him the opportunity to focus on spiritual and intellectual values, generate new ideas, which will bring the taste of novelty into their common affairs.

Secondary is this but it makes me sound bad. *sigh*

The Psychologist needs a partner indulgent enough to his weak points: negligence at work, lack of consideration to rules, norms and hierarchy, outbursts of non-motivated aggression.

[/quote]

[vague]

[Hugo]

Nicky, is this OK

ENFp:
"The ISTp creates convenience and comfort for me."

[Slacker]

Yeah well that's kind of the what without the why, but it's accurate. It seems like anyone would like someone who creates convenience for them though. If every type would answer "yes" is it of much help to you?

[Hugo]

It seems like anyone would like someone who creates convenience for them though.

I don't think beta and gamma go for convenience

[Cone]

Convenience isn't the prime factor in non-Si duals.

My choice: "[The critic] needs a cheerful partner who could easily correct his tactical mistakes and not stay resentful over trifles."

[science as magic]

I couldn't pick a full sentence so I chose this:

softens his severe soul.

I think I am applying it in ways that are outside the context of that particular sentence though but yeah, the concept intrigues me.

[snegledmaca]

These:

he admires strong people possessing leadership skills. He tries to be useful to them by giving cautionary advice.
[...]
He needs, too, a support of an authoritative partner, who understands instructions and rules, possesses penetrative skills, realism and practical intelligence.

I'm going by INFp now.

[Hugo]

ENFp:
The ISTp creates convenience and comfort for me.

INTp:
The ESFp is a cheerful partner who can easily correct my tactical mistakes and not stay resentful over trifles.

[Hugo]

Pedro-the-Lion and snegledmaca, please choose one sentence. Thanks.

This is what I've got so far, which is interesting.

ENFp:
The ISTp creates convenience and comfort for me.

INTp:
The ESFp is a cheerful partner who can easily correct my tactical mistakes and not stay resentful over trifles.

[Expat]

First, I do not think that is a very good description of the ENTj-ISFj duality at all. For an accurate one IMO, please look here.

The one from socioniko.net seems to have been written by someone who may have observed ENTjs but did not get them. At most, that is a description of how that duality might work in very mundane and minor matters - as if the couple observed were retired and in their 60s.

If I had to choose one sentence from that description that is relevant, I'd have to pick this one:

"The Guardian diligently performs routine tasks; he is well aware of what people need not in the future, but in the here and now".

But to me that is really a very minor point and I appreciate ISFjs for far more than their practicality in small matters.

[Hugo]

thanks expat and everyone else.

ok project over

i'll come up with another project shortly

sorry