What do you think of this socionics test?

[The Exception]

Mizami: Registreer jezelf nu!
Test results
LII Your result
EII These types might also be considered
ILI
LIE
IEI These types are not very likely
EIE
ILE
IEE
LSI These types are quite unlikely
ESI
SLI
LSE
SEI these types are extremely unlikely
ESE
SLE
SEE

I thought the results were quite accurate. Interesting how my top 8 types are all intuitive.

[Kritik]

in for later testing

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[Azeroffs]

Interesting

LII Your result
LIE These types might also be considered
ILI
EII
LSI These types are not very likely
ILE
EIE
LSE
IEI These types are quite unlikely
SLI
ESI
IEE
SLE these types are extremely unlikely
ESE
SEI
SEE

[Mattie]

I felt it was kinda lopsided in some things, and I agree with what jason said. I came out FeNi, which isn't correct. I think the test should focus more on quadra values as this test seems to look for more responses to find your club.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[Gilly]

I got IEI>ILI>IEE>SEE, with EIE being way down under "quite unlikely." o_O

[athenian200]

IEI Your result

These types might also be considered

EII
ILI
LII

These types are not very likely

SEI
ESI
SLI
LSI

These types are quite unlikely

IEE
EIE
ILE
LIE

these types are extremely unlikely
SEE
ESE
SLE
LSE

Weird. It brought back IEI. Sigh, just what I needed. They never make it easier to figure out your type...

[ragnar]

Mizami: Registreer jezelf nu!
Test results

Your result

ILI

These types might also be considered

SLI
ILE
SLE

These types are not very likely

LII
IEI
LSI
SEI

These types are quite unlikely

LIE
IEE
LSE
SEE

these types are extremely unlikely

EII
ESI
EIE
ESE

Some of the questions were quite ambiguous, difficult to give a good answer to.

[Cone]

Holy fuck! You guys change Socionics or something? I'm embarrassed to even post this! You people might think I lied on the test or something... *embarrassed emoticon since apparently it's gone now*

SEE Your result
SLE These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI
IEI These types are not very likely
SEI
SLI
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EIE
ESE
LII these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
EII
LIE

Well, I still get ILI as a highly-considerable type. One thing's for sure, though: I've changed a lot. I used to be severely repressed back in high school, and even throughout most of college, I wouldn't say I was exactly socially anxious, just socially maligned, if that makes any sense. I'm not really shy anymore, at least not in the traditional way, and most of my shyness comes from complex factors that are unrelated to "general" social anxiety or AvPD. Nowadays, I stab people in the face who try to tell me I'm "shy" or "unemotional", and I feel like I'm in a stage now where I feel threatened at every turn as I attempt to assert who I really feel I am. I don't think I really should have taken that test, as I'm not exactly in a healthy state right now, although I did give those questions answers I would give if I was in a healthy state (and right now I don't feel too bad!)

As is indicated by my test results, I'm about as P as they come. That I can agree with 100%. E is indicated over I, and F/T and S/N are ambiguous. I think I still understand J/P and E/I differences, possibly even S/N differences, but F/T differences is something I never really got ahold of. I know that you guys think about Socionics differently nowadays than how we did in the distant past, and I'd be glad to go back into type analysis by anyone that's willing. But I know you guys will probably want to keep me INTp.

As for the test, some questions I just couldn't answer, because Rick uses concepts that I've never thought of before. Of course, that's why I really don't like any tests, and it always takes me fifty years to get through any of them. For example, he asked a question that said something like, "you feel that you control the emotional atmosphere around people or in relationships OR the emotional atmosphere is something you don't control" and for one, I've never thought about this before, and two, I don't feel either of these ways. I feel that I match the emotional atmosphere, whatever it may be, and the cause or effect of the situation is something I don't know. Another one: "You try to plan a strategy and get a feel for the general outline of things OR you are very adept at solving problems when they come." I haven't a clue. You know what I mean?

Anyway, enough verbosity for now. Have fun, everyone!

Coney

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[Jarno]

I know that you guys think about Socionics differently nowadays than how we did in the distant past

What has been changed from your point of view? I'm curious.

Personally I find things to be getting to abstract and unnecessary complex, instead of simplicity and being practical.

[Cone]

Jarno: People were commenting on my old INTp/INTj post about how it's changed, so I just figured it did. Personally I've forgotten half the stuff about Socionics.

Lol... You are just too irrational for the test... (if you don't do all of the test at once, no breaks, you'll automatically end up with the SEE-SLE-IEE-etc. result.) :tongue:

Ok, so I just went through it again and answered all the questions as randomly and as fast as possible. I get the same exact result. Although the first time I think I screwed up the last part of the test (with the "better"/"much better" stuff), as I didn't understand what was going on. I figured it out now, but still...THIS TEST IS BROKEN! Or at least I fail at it, badly.

EDIT: Ok, so I went through the test again for real. Same damn thing. I give up. One thing's apparently for sure: I think about myself practically all the time, yet I don't know myself at all.

[Wynch]

Same old song and dance:

ILE Your result
SLE These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI
SEE These types are not very likely
SLI
LIE
IEI
LSE These types are quite unlikely
SEI
EIE
LII
ESE these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
EII
ESI

[Azeroffs]

Very interesting.

lol yeah.. it's not impossible

[electric sheep]

Your result
LII

These types might also be considered
ILI
EII
LIE

These types are not very likely
IEI
LSI
ILE
SLI

These types are quite unlikely
EIE
ESI
IEE
LSE

these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
SLE
ESE
SEE

I like these results

[717495]

It would be funny if all of these were right:

Sky's an EIE
Gilly's an IEI
Cone's an SEE
I'm an IEE!

[them]

i don't know much about socionics. i think it's a good test, though. it had questions and multiple answer choices and even gave me a result at the end.

[Cone]

i don't know much about socionics. i think it's a good test, though. it had questions and multiple answer choices and even gave me a result at the end.

Lol! Well, tests tend to have stuff and tell you stuff...Anyway, nice to see you and welcome.

It would be funny if all of these were right:

Sky's an EIE
Gilly's an IEI
Cone's an SEE
I'm an IEE!

ILIs, YOU HAVE FOUND YOUR DUAL AND IT IS I.

[Warlord]

Holy fuck! You guys change Socionics or something? I'm embarrassed to even post this! You people might think I lied on the test or something... *embarrassed emoticon since apparently it's gone now*

SEE Your result
SLE These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI
IEI These types are not very likely
SEI
SLI
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EIE
ESE
LII these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
EII
LIE

There's a bug in the test, it gives that result if you do the test too slowly.

[717495]

There's a bug in the test, it gives that result if you do the test too slowly.

Lol. Slow...

ILIs, YOU HAVE FOUND YOUR DUAL AND IT IS I.

Never. I think you're an ILI.

[Cone]

Actually, I did the test in the suggested time of between 20 and 30 minutes, twice, and for one run, I just answered the questions as fast and as randomly as possible, and I still got the same exact result each time. Apparently the bug is in how contradictory your answers are, at least in regards to Socionics, and well, I'm both slow and apparently contradictory when I take these tests. It's not really that I think I "over-interpret" the questions (or maybe it is), it's that when I go to answer half of these questions, I'm always stuck thinking either "I don't understand" or "I've never thought of myself in that way before". I couldn't get an overarching view of myself even if my life depended on it. I define myself by the way I act at any given moment, I guess, and when I go to give answers to these tests, I always go back into my memory and try to find examples of behaviors I've exhibited that may match. I guess it's not about how I feel but rather how I act. (I have to ask, is there a type that does that?)

[munenori2]

Basically the same as last time, just shuffled around a bit.

[marooned]

ILI Your result
These types might also be considered
IEI
LII
ILE
These types are not very likely
EII
IEE
SLI
SEI
These types are quite unlikely
LIE
EIE
LSI
SLE
These types are extremely unlikely
ESI
SEE
LSE
ESE

[Satan]

SLE Your result
ILE These types might also be considered
SEE
SLI
LSE These types are not very likely
IEE
ILI
LIE
SEI These types are quite unlikely
LSI
ESE
IEI
EIE these types are extremely unlikely
LII
ESI
EII

[Expat]

ILI Your result
LII ILE LIE IEI These types might also be considered
EII SLI LSI IEE These types are not very likely
EIE SLE LSE SEI These types are quite unlikely
ESI SEE ESE These types are extremely unlikely

It's too based on four dichotomies and base functions.

[duality is cringe]

ILI Your result
SLI These types might also be considered
LII
LSI
IEI These types are not very likely
SEI
ILE
SLE
EII These types are quite unlikely
ESI
LIE
LSE
IEE these types are extremely unlikely
SEE
EIE
ESE

[Nexus]

I think it's a great test...

[717495]

I don't. I don't think there exists a great test. Obviously there has been problems with both of these tests, if you hadn't noticed.

[Nexus]

I don't. I don't think there exists a great test. Obviously there has been problems with both of these tests, if you hadn't noticed.

yeah, but this one has higher convergence

[redbaron]

It's okay. I've seen worse.

I got IEI
types might be considered: IEE, EII (HA), ILI
not likely: SEI, EIE, ILE, SEE
unlikely: LII, ESI, SLI, LIE
extremely unlikely: ESE, SLE, LSI, LSE

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[Kim]

Your result: IEE
These types might also be considered: ILE, SEE, IEI
These types are not very likely EIE, SLE, ILI, SEI
These types are quite unlikely: LIE, ESE, EII, SLI
these types are extremely unlikely LSE, LII, ESI, LSI

[greed]

SEE Your result
SLE These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI
IEI These types are not very likely
SEI
SLI
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EIE
ESE
LII these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
EII
LIE

ahahahaha

[Creepy-male]

I tested as IEI. Rick's test 1 tends to put me as IEI too.

Second choice was IEE, followed by EII, followed by SEI.

/shrug

[1981slater]

Indeed!

Testing sucks. I took one test once and I got my least probable type among the 16 types was ILE. Good call

Who knows? Perhaps it was just a joke

[717495]

Figured I might take this test again (even though I hate tests!) but that's mainly because I focus so hard on answering fairly and accurately.
______________________________________

ILI ........Your result

SLI ........These types might also be considered
IEI
LII

SEI ........These types are not very likely
LSI
EII
ESI

ILE .........These types are quite unlikely
SLE
IEE
LIE

SEE ........These types are extremely unlikely
LSE
EIE
ESE
______________________________________

My thoughts
1st and 2nd result ILI, SLI: maybe so, though why?
3rd result IEI: doubt it (obviously I test strong on Ni though)
4th result LII: could be?
Last results EIE, ESE: I hope not

My real type according to this test: ISI ()

[CILi]

^ That's some strong I.
__________________________________________________

IEE ........Your Result

IEI ........Might Also Be Considered
SEE
ILE

SEI ........Not Very Likely
ILI
EIE
SLE

EII ........Quite Unlikely
SLI
ESE
LIE

ESI ........Extremely Unlikely
LII
LSE
LSI
__________________________________________________

Seems my sig's gonna need some work.

[717495]

Yeah I just wish they didn't put good at forecasting what events to come in the future. Everything else they talk about ILIs in descriptions fit me really well, even the association with time. You'd think that there wouldn't be that many people relating to Ni if its prime concern was focused on boring old forecasting. Since when is 1 out of every 8 peoples primary concern forecasting? and you'd think that's more of an S thing. I think they might need to change the description of Ni to something better, because I keep hearing this "can predict the future" myth and I can't type anyone based on that! Most people I know who sort of think about what might happen later and plan ahead, are also much more pragmatic and are Ss, where as Ns I know are much more in to theory, introspection, abstractions, ideas and imagination.

[Krig the Viking]

IEE ........Your Result

Interesting. That was my first impression based on your VI.