Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 48

Thread: What do you think of this socionics test?

  1. #1
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,108
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default What do you think of this socionics test?

    Mizami: Registreer jezelf nu!
    Test results
    LII Your result
    EII These types might also be considered
    ILI
    LIE
    IEI These types are not very likely
    EIE
    ILE
    IEE
    LSI These types are quite unlikely
    ESI
    SLI
    LSE
    SEI these types are extremely unlikely
    ESE
    SLE
    SEE

    I thought the results were quite accurate. Interesting how my top 8 types are all intuitive.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  2. #2
    INTP Kritik's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    74
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    in for later testing

  3. #3
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  4. #4
    Azeroffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    California
    TIM
    ENTj 3w4 sp/sx
    Posts
    2,216
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Interesting

    LII Your result
    LIE These types might also be considered
    ILI
    EII
    LSI These types are not very likely
    ILE
    EIE
    LSE
    IEI These types are quite unlikely
    SLI
    ESI
    IEE
    SLE these types are extremely unlikely
    ESE
    SEI
    SEE
    3w4-5w6-9w8

  5. #5
    i'll tear down the sky Mattie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    TIM
    NeFi
    Posts
    1,108
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I felt it was kinda lopsided in some things, and I agree with what jason said. I came out FeNi, which isn't correct. I think the test should focus more on quadra values as this test seems to look for more responses to find your club.

  6. #6
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  7. #7
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got IEI>ILI>IEE>SEE, with EIE being way down under "quite unlikely." o_O
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IEI Your result

    These types might also be considered

    EII
    ILI
    LII

    These types are not very likely

    SEI
    ESI
    SLI
    LSI

    These types are quite unlikely

    IEE
    EIE
    ILE
    LIE

    these types are extremely unlikely
    SEE
    ESE
    SLE
    LSE
    Weird. It brought back IEI. Sigh, just what I needed. They never make it easier to figure out your type...

  9. #9
    ragnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    635
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by warrior-librarian View Post
    Your result
    ILI
    These types might also be considered
    SLI
    ILE
    SLE
    These types are not very likely
    LII
    IEI
    LSI
    SEI

    These types are quite unlikely
    LIE
    IEE
    LSE
    SEE
    these types are extremely unlikely
    EII
    ESI
    EIE
    ESE

    Some of the questions were quite ambiguous, difficult to give a good answer to.
    Greetings, ragnar
    ILI knowledge-seeker

  10. #10
    Cone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,717
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Holy fuck! You guys change Socionics or something? I'm embarrassed to even post this! You people might think I lied on the test or something... *embarrassed emoticon since apparently it's gone now*

    SEE Your result
    SLE These types might also be considered
    IEE
    ILI
    IEI These types are not very likely
    SEI
    SLI
    ILE
    ESI These types are quite unlikely
    LSE
    EIE
    ESE
    LII these types are extremely unlikely
    LSI
    EII
    LIE

    Well, I still get ILI as a highly-considerable type. One thing's for sure, though: I've changed a lot. I used to be severely repressed back in high school, and even throughout most of college, I wouldn't say I was exactly socially anxious, just socially maligned, if that makes any sense. I'm not really shy anymore, at least not in the traditional way, and most of my shyness comes from complex factors that are unrelated to "general" social anxiety or AvPD. Nowadays, I stab people in the face who try to tell me I'm "shy" or "unemotional", and I feel like I'm in a stage now where I feel threatened at every turn as I attempt to assert who I really feel I am. I don't think I really should have taken that test, as I'm not exactly in a healthy state right now, although I did give those questions answers I would give if I was in a healthy state (and right now I don't feel too bad!)

    As is indicated by my test results, I'm about as P as they come. That I can agree with 100%. E is indicated over I, and F/T and S/N are ambiguous. I think I still understand J/P and E/I differences, possibly even S/N differences, but F/T differences is something I never really got ahold of. I know that you guys think about Socionics differently nowadays than how we did in the distant past, and I'd be glad to go back into type analysis by anyone that's willing. But I know you guys will probably want to keep me INTp.

    As for the test, some questions I just couldn't answer, because Rick uses concepts that I've never thought of before. Of course, that's why I really don't like any tests, and it always takes me fifty years to get through any of them. For example, he asked a question that said something like, "you feel that you control the emotional atmosphere around people or in relationships OR the emotional atmosphere is something you don't control" and for one, I've never thought about this before, and two, I don't feel either of these ways. I feel that I match the emotional atmosphere, whatever it may be, and the cause or effect of the situation is something I don't know. Another one: "You try to plan a strategy and get a feel for the general outline of things OR you are very adept at solving problems when they come." I haven't a clue. You know what I mean?

    Anyway, enough verbosity for now. Have fun, everyone!

    Coney
    Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)

  11. #11
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  12. #12
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,375
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cone View Post
    I know that you guys think about Socionics differently nowadays than how we did in the distant past
    What has been changed from your point of view? I'm curious.

    Personally I find things to be getting to abstract and unnecessary complex, instead of simplicity and being practical.

  13. #13
    Cone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,717
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Jarno: People were commenting on my old INTp/INTj post about how it's changed, so I just figured it did. Personally I've forgotten half the stuff about Socionics.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mimosa Pudica View Post
    Lol... You are just too irrational for the test... (if you don't do all of the test at once, no breaks, you'll automatically end up with the SEE-SLE-IEE-etc. result.) :tongue:
    Ok, so I just went through it again and answered all the questions as randomly and as fast as possible. I get the same exact result. Although the first time I think I screwed up the last part of the test (with the "better"/"much better" stuff), as I didn't understand what was going on. I figured it out now, but still...THIS TEST IS BROKEN! Or at least I fail at it, badly.

    EDIT: Ok, so I went through the test again for real. Same damn thing. I give up. One thing's apparently for sure: I think about myself practically all the time, yet I don't know myself at all.
    Last edited by Cone; 06-13-2009 at 11:57 AM.
    Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)

  14. #14
    <something> Wynch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On a Hill
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    3,910
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Same old song and dance:

    ILE Your result
    SLE These types might also be considered
    IEE
    ILI
    SEE These types are not very likely
    SLI
    LIE
    IEI
    LSE These types are quite unlikely
    SEI
    EIE
    LII
    ESE these types are extremely unlikely
    LSI
    EII
    ESI
    ILE
    7w8 so/sp

    Very busy with work. Only kind of around.

  15. #15
    Azeroffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    California
    TIM
    ENTj 3w4 sp/sx
    Posts
    2,216
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ephemeros View Post
    Very interesting.
    lol yeah.. it's not impossible
    3w4-5w6-9w8

  16. #16
    constant change electric sheep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,296
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your result
    LII

    These types might also be considered
    ILI
    EII
    LIE

    These types are not very likely
    IEI
    LSI
    ILE
    SLI

    These types are quite unlikely
    EIE
    ESI
    IEE
    LSE

    these types are extremely unlikely
    SEI
    SLE
    ESE
    SEE

    I like these results
    The saddest ESFj

    ...

  17. #17
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It would be funny if all of these were right:

    Sky's an EIE
    Gilly's an IEI
    Cone's an SEE
    I'm an IEE!

  18. #18
    them's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    TIM
    ISTp
    Posts
    76
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    i don't know much about socionics. i think it's a good test, though. it had questions and multiple answer choices and even gave me a result at the end.

  19. #19
    Cone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,717
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by virekz View Post
    i don't know much about socionics. i think it's a good test, though. it had questions and multiple answer choices and even gave me a result at the end.
    Lol! Well, tests tend to have stuff and tell you stuff...Anyway, nice to see you and welcome.

    Quote Originally Posted by polikujm View Post
    It would be funny if all of these were right:

    Sky's an EIE
    Gilly's an IEI
    Cone's an SEE
    I'm an IEE!
    ILIs, YOU HAVE FOUND YOUR DUAL AND IT IS I.
    Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cone View Post
    Holy fuck! You guys change Socionics or something? I'm embarrassed to even post this! You people might think I lied on the test or something... *embarrassed emoticon since apparently it's gone now*

    SEE Your result
    SLE These types might also be considered
    IEE
    ILI
    IEI These types are not very likely
    SEI
    SLI
    ILE
    ESI These types are quite unlikely
    LSE
    EIE
    ESE
    LII these types are extremely unlikely
    LSI
    EII
    LIE
    There's a bug in the test, it gives that result if you do the test too slowly.
    ...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.

    INTp

  21. #21
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warlord View Post
    There's a bug in the test, it gives that result if you do the test too slowly.
    Lol. Slow...

    Quote Originally Posted by Cone View Post
    ILIs, YOU HAVE FOUND YOUR DUAL AND IT IS I.
    Never. I think you're an ILI.

  22. #22
    Cone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,717
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    Actually, I did the test in the suggested time of between 20 and 30 minutes, twice, and for one run, I just answered the questions as fast and as randomly as possible, and I still got the same exact result each time. Apparently the bug is in how contradictory your answers are, at least in regards to Socionics, and well, I'm both slow and apparently contradictory when I take these tests. It's not really that I think I "over-interpret" the questions (or maybe it is), it's that when I go to answer half of these questions, I'm always stuck thinking either "I don't understand" or "I've never thought of myself in that way before". I couldn't get an overarching view of myself even if my life depended on it. I define myself by the way I act at any given moment, I guess, and when I go to give answers to these tests, I always go back into my memory and try to find examples of behaviors I've exhibited that may match. I guess it's not about how I feel but rather how I act. (I have to ask, is there a type that does that?)
    Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)

  23. #23
    Snomunegot munenori2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    TIM
    Introvert sp/sx
    Posts
    7,739
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    Basically the same as last time, just shuffled around a bit.
    Moonlight will fall
    Winter will end
    Harvest will come
    Your heart will mend

  24. #24
    The Iniquitous inumbra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    954
    Posts
    5,989
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ILI Your result
    These types might also be considered
    IEI
    LII
    ILE
    These types are not very likely
    EII
    IEE
    SLI
    SEI
    These types are quite unlikely
    LIE
    EIE
    LSI
    SLE
    These types are extremely unlikely
    ESI
    SEE
    LSE
    ESE

  25. #25
    I've been waiting for you Satan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Behind you
    TIM
    sle sp/sx 845
    Posts
    4,956
    Mentioned
    137 Post(s)
    Tagged
    15 Thread(s)

    Default

    SLE Your result
    ILE These types might also be considered
    SEE
    SLI
    LSE These types are not very likely
    IEE
    ILI
    LIE
    SEI These types are quite unlikely
    LSI
    ESE
    IEI
    EIE these types are extremely unlikely
    LII
    ESI
    EII

  26. #26
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ILI Your result
    LII ILE LIE IEI These types might also be considered
    EII SLI LSI IEE These types are not very likely
    EIE SLE LSE SEI These types are quite unlikely
    ESI SEE ESE These types are extremely unlikely

    It's too based on four dichotomies and base functions.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  27. #27
    ***el X Mercenary Nebuchadnezzar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Socionix sleeper cell
    TIM
    Te-ISTp
    Posts
    1,413
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ILI Your result
    SLI These types might also be considered
    LII
    LSI
    IEI These types are not very likely
    SEI
    ILE
    SLE
    EII These types are quite unlikely
    ESI
    LIE
    LSE
    IEE these types are extremely unlikely
    SEE
    EIE
    ESE

    "His feeling that this world is not his Fatherland, and that it does not represent his proper condition, so to speak—his feeling that, basically, he 'comes from afar'—will remain a fundamental element which will not give rise to mystical escapism and spiritual weakness, but rather will enable him to minimise, to relativise, to refer to higher concepts of measure and limit, all that can seem important and definitive to others, starting with death itself, and will confer on him calm force and breadth of vision." — Julius Evola

    SLI-Te | 5w6 sp/so
    Oldham Solitary

    Johari
    Nohari

  28. #28
    the Omniscient Nexus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    TIM
    INTp
    Posts
    1,408
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think it's a great test...


  29. #29
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't. I don't think there exists a great test. Obviously there has been problems with both of these tests, if you hadn't noticed.

  30. #30
    the Omniscient Nexus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    TIM
    INTp
    Posts
    1,408
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Knight View Post
    I don't. I don't think there exists a great test. Obviously there has been problems with both of these tests, if you hadn't noticed.
    yeah, but this one has higher convergence

  31. #31
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,321
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's okay. I've seen worse.

    I got IEI
    types might be considered: IEE, EII (HA), ILI
    not likely: SEI, EIE, ILE, SEE
    unlikely: LII, ESI, SLI, LIE
    extremely unlikely: ESE, SLE, LSI, LSE
    IEI-Fe 4w3

  32. #32
    Creepy-Diana

    Default

    .

  33. #33
    Kim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    TIM
    IEE e7 783 sx so
    Posts
    6,857
    Mentioned
    380 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your result: IEE
    These types might also be considered: ILE, SEE, IEI
    These types are not very likely EIE, SLE, ILI, SEI
    These types are quite unlikely: LIE, ESE, EII, SLI
    these types are extremely unlikely LSE, LII, ESI, LSI
    “Let us forget with generosity those who cannot love us”
    ― Pablo Neruda

  34. #34
    oh man, greed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    alabamer
    Posts
    111
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    SEE Your result
    SLE These types might also be considered
    IEE
    ILI
    IEI These types are not very likely
    SEI
    SLI
    ILE
    ESI These types are quite unlikely
    LSE
    EIE
    ESE
    LII these types are extremely unlikely
    LSI
    EII
    LIE
    ahahahaha
    IEE-Ne | ENFP | 4w3-6w7-9w1 so/sp/sx | sCoA|I| | Sanguine/Choleric | Benevolent Inventor

    birthday frog wishes you a happy birthday
    birthday frog will give you presents and a card on your birthday
    birthday frog is Fe incarnate

  35. #35
    not a bumblebee octo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    TIM
    IEI 4-6-9 apparently
    Posts
    2,744
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I took the test again and now it's telling me this:

    SLE Your result
    SEE These types might also be considered
    ILE
    IEE
    SLI These types are not very likely
    SEI
    LSE
    ILI
    ESE These types are quite unlikely
    IEI
    LIE
    EIE
    LSI these types are extremely unlikely
    ESI
    LII
    EII


    If we combine the results from last time, I'm IEE or SEE, both of which are Ti-PoLR, which I'm certainly not. Too irrational for this test.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agee The Great View Post
    Nobody here...besides me, seems to know what SLE is except for maybe Maritsa.

  36. #36
    Creepy-male

    Default

    I tested as IEI. Rick's test 1 tends to put me as IEI too.

    Second choice was IEE, followed by EII, followed by SEI.

    /shrug

  37. #37
    ILE - ENTp 1981slater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spain
    TIM
    ILE (ENTp)
    Posts
    4,866
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Indeed!

    Testing sucks. I took one test once and I got my least probable type among the 16 types was ILE. Good call

    Who knows? Perhaps it was just a joke
    ILE "Searcher"
    Socionics: ENTp
    DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
    Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
    MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
    Astrological sign: Aquarius

    To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.

  38. #38
    not a bumblebee octo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    TIM
    IEI 4-6-9 apparently
    Posts
    2,744
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mimosa Pudica View Post
    To be positive - maybe the test is improved since the last time we took it?
    Haha, this test really wants us to be identicals

    I don't know, it might have something to do with my life circumstances. I'm beginning to feel acutely aware of my Fi-related deficiencies and it may be pushing my results towards SLE. Or I'm maturing and growing into my type? I don't know anymore.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agee The Great View Post
    Nobody here...besides me, seems to know what SLE is except for maybe Maritsa.

  39. #39
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Figured I might take this test again (even though I hate tests!) but that's mainly because I focus so hard on answering fairly and accurately.
    ______________________________________

    ILI ........Your result

    SLI ........These types might also be considered
    IEI
    LII

    SEI ........These types are not very likely
    LSI
    EII
    ESI

    ILE .........These types are quite unlikely
    SLE
    IEE
    LIE

    SEE ........These types are extremely unlikely
    LSE
    EIE
    ESE
    ______________________________________

    My thoughts
    1st and 2nd result ILI, SLI: maybe so, though why?
    3rd result IEI: doubt it (obviously I test strong on Ni though)
    4th result LII: could be?
    Last results EIE, ESE: I hope not

    My real type according to this test: ISI ()

  40. #40
    CILi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    635
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^ That's some strong I.
    __________________________________________________

    IEE ........Your Result

    IEI ........Might Also Be Considered
    SEE
    ILE

    SEI ........Not Very Likely
    ILI
    EIE
    SLE

    EII ........Quite Unlikely
    SLI
    ESE
    LIE

    ESI ........Extremely Unlikely
    LII
    LSE
    LSI
    __________________________________________________

    Seems my sig's gonna need some work.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •