Are the socioscope descriptions any good?
...been here longer than the fucking monarchy
I think there are at least some elements of most of the descriptions (or links to descriptions) found on Wikisocion that are pretty decent. I used practically all of them in compiling the SLE description. Obviously, there is some shit there, either because of poor translation, or just because generally the author is a poor writer/fails to grasp the essence of the type but, overall, I think socioscopes are amongst the "decent" type descriptions of socionics literature.