An Ne/Ti speaks like this:
An Ni/Fe speaks like this:
Originally Posted by StrrrngOriginally Posted by Strrrng
Neither you nor I have the metaphoric attraction that Strrrng has. The Ni is obvious; His abstractions are subjective, and continuous. They are not module, you cannot break them up into smaller concepts, they are not replicable, they do not fit into a framework. His writing style is completely different. To me, the difference between static and dynamic is obvious. Your words are broken up into clearly separate, discrete parts, He has a single continuing train of thought.
My abstractions are not personal, they can be replaced, stored, modified, sythesized, and fractured. They are "module"
So if you will agree that Strrrng is at least conveying Ni, I am pretty damn sure I don't write like that and tbh as interesting as what he said is, I find myself often skipping through his big blocks of text because there is no associative concepts I can latch onto.
Do you see the difference?