View Poll Results: What dichotomy(s) are the same or different in both of your types?

Voters
51. You may not vote on this poll
  • difference in Introversion/Extraversion

    7 13.73%
  • difference in Intuitive/Sensing

    4 7.84%
  • difference in Thinking/Feeling

    7 13.73%
  • difference in Judging/Perceiving

    11 21.57%
  • same in Introversion/Extraversion

    39 76.47%
  • same in Intuitive/Sensing

    40 78.43%
  • same in Thinking/Feeling

    37 72.55%
  • same in Judging/Perceiving

    35 68.63%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 58

Thread: Post your MBTI type and Socionics type

  1. #1
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Post your MBTI type and Socionics type

    Follow my lead by typing your MBTI type and socionics type like the following, and try not to have extra conversation here unless it's directly about your MBTI relating to your socionics type.

  2. #2
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    INTJ : LII

  3. #3
    Slippery when wet Simon Ssmall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    ✈ ↺
    Posts
    2,225
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENFP/ENFp

  4. #4
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Changes depending on mood.

    So, XXFP : SEI

  5. #5
    07490's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    there
    Posts
    3,032
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENFj: EIE
    (D)IEE~FI-(C)SLE~Ni E-5w4(Sp/Sx)/7w8(So/Sp)/9w1(sp/sx)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarno View Post
    1)
    A girl who I want to date, asks me: well first tell me how tall you are?
    My reply: well I will answer that, if you first tell me how much you weigh!

    2)
    A girl I was dating said she was oh so great at sex etc, but she didn't do blowjobs.
    My reply: Oh I'm really romantic etc, I just will never take you out to dinner.

  6. #6
    ILE - ENTp 1981slater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spain
    TIM
    ILE (ENTp)
    Posts
    4,870
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default x

    ENFP & ILE
    ILE "Searcher"
    Socionics: ENTp
    DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
    Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
    MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
    Astrological sign: Aquarius

    To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by polikujm View Post
    INTJ : LII
    This typing fits you better, than your previous self-typing as NiTe.

    INTP : NiTe

    INTP is based on tests. Although I usually score only just slightly in favor P dichotomy. On the dichotomic/behavioural descriptions I'm INTP. On the functional descriptions I'm half-INTJ half-INTP.
    ...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.

    INTp

  8. #8
    i'll tear down the sky Mattie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    TIM
    NeFi
    Posts
    1,105
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENFP : NeFi

  9. #9
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    TIM
    Yet to be determined
    Posts
    4,411
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I get INTX, but if I had to settle with one it would be INTP for the irrationality and cognitive functional order (TiNe...).
    The end is nigh

  10. #10
    tereg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    TIM
    EII/INFj
    Posts
    4,680
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I get INFP in MBTI, and ... something in Socionics (IEE, EII, SEI, IEI all plausible)
    INFj

    9w1 sp/sx

  11. #11
    Creepy-Diana

    Default

    .

  12. #12
    Creepy-Cyclops

    Default

    I score ISTP on MBTI and Kiersey tests, and SLI on socionics tests.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    17,948
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    MBTI: INTP most of the time. Rarely INTJ.

    Socionics: INTp, INTj, ISTp, ISTj.

  14. #14
    xyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,707
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ISTP:SLI
    "Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities..."

    - Voltaire

  15. #15
    pluie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    TIM
    IEI 4 sx
    Posts
    300
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENFP on mbti

    undecided on socionics.
    "If you can find out little melodies for yourself on the piano it is all very well. But if they come of themselves when you are not at the piano, then you have still greater reason to rejoice; for then the inner sense of music is astir in you. The fingers must make what the head wills, not vice versa."- Robert Schumann

  16. #16
    RSV3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    191
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    INTJ/LII

  17. #17
    JuJu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    2,703
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENFP and ENFj

  18. #18
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In MBTI I test as INTJ most of the time.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  19. #19
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    MBTT - INTP
    Socionics - ILE > ILI > IEE > IEI

  20. #20
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,685
    Mentioned
    95 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENTP:EIE

  21. #21
    expired Lotus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    TIM
    Se/Ni sx/sp
    Posts
    4,492
    Mentioned
    100 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    MBTI: I've scored ENFP, ENTP, ESTP, ESFP, ISFP, ISTP, & ISTJ
    Socionics: ESI
    maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
    maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
    go ask the frog what the scorpion knows

  22. #22
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,937
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    INTP - INTj

    I don't identify with "definite and self-confident, ruthless implementor of plans" and don't see how any Si/Ne valuing type ever could.

  23. #23
    Snomunegot munenori2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    TIM
    Introvert sp/sx
    Posts
    7,742
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    MBTI: mostly INFP
    socionics: ISFp
    Moonlight will fall
    Winter will end
    Harvest will come
    Your heart will mend

  24. #24
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,428
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The results of the poll show that the correlation is evident.

  25. #25
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarno View Post
    The results of the poll show that the correlation is evident.
    Not really..11 of the 20 people (out of the total of 28) who said that they were the same on the Thinking/Feeling axis could have said they were different on one of the other three dichotomies...also, the difference/same subtotals don't add up to 28...which means in addition there are some people who are unsure if they score the same on a particular dichotomy.

  26. #26
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The poll asks about correspondences in 4 dichotomies.

    ~75% of posters reported correspondence in at least one of those 4.

    As far as the results go, statistically, there is no correlation whatsoever.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  27. #27
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Plus, what about the people who are basing their typing off previous experiences with MBTI, who actually aren't typing themselves accurately?

    Look at this:

    Two of my friends:

    INTJ : ESTp
    INxP : ESTj

    Yep.
    That's what I'd like to call socionics at the end of the day.

  28. #28
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ifmd95 View Post
    well you're probably not going to infer a 1:1 correlation. but if there was "no correlation", wouldn't one see convergences around (or slightly below because of nonresponses) 50%? the poll accounts for both "correspondence" and "noncorrespondence".
    If there was no correlation whatsoever, then you'd expect 100% of people to vote "difference" for each dichotomy, and 0% to vote "same".

    If everybody identified in both systems with three out of four dichotomies, you'd get on average 75% of people voting "same" for each dichotomy, while having no apparent 1:1 correlation between the two systems (i.e. people having the 'same' type in both).

    The average for people voting "same" is about 77%...and this does not take into account people who voted for neither "difference" or "same" for a particular dichotomy.

  29. #29
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,840
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subterranean View Post
    If there was no correlation whatsoever, then you'd expect 100% of people to vote "difference" for each dichotomy, and 0% to vote "same".
    That would be negative correlation. That is different from "no correlation".

  30. #30
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,428
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    ~75% of posters reported correspondence in at least one of those 4.

    As far as the results go, statistically, there is no correlation whatsoever.
    Your assumption in incorrect. ~50% means no correlation.

    There are multiple options possible.

    So in this actual case it's even possible that ~75% of the posters reported correspondence to all of the 4 dichotomies.

    I wonder what numbers you would like to see to call it a correlation.
    Last edited by Jarno; 05-15-2009 at 08:40 PM.

  31. #31
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tuturututu View Post
    That would be negative correlation. That is different from "no correlation".
    I don't believe you can have negative correlation in this case. You could if you were comparing two linear variables such as weight and height, but not if you were asking if there was a correlation between two systems (a 'yes' or 'no' answer)...in which case, it would go from a correlation of 0 to 100%.

  32. #32
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,840
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subterranean View Post
    I don't believe you can have negative correlation in this case. You could if you were comparing two linear variables such as weight and height, but not if you were asking if there was a correlation between two systems...in which case, it would go from a correlation of 0 to 100%.
    What you call CORRELATION inhere is actually CORRESPONDENCE.
    So, 1:1 positive correlation => 100% correspondence.
    1:1 negative correlation => 0% correspondence.
    No correlation => 50% correspondence.

  33. #33
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oh I see. But if 50% of people said there was a 1:1 correlation between their socionics type and their MBTI type, and 50% said there wasn't, it wouldn't mean that there was no correlation whatsoever between the two systems, would it? INTJs and INTps share at least some similarities for example.

  34. #34
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,840
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subterranean View Post
    Oh I see. But if 50% of people said there was a 1:1 correlation between their socionics type and their MBTI type, and 50% said there wasn't, it wouldn't mean that there was no correlation whatsoever between the two systems, would it? INTJs and INTps share at least some similarities for example.
    If 50% of people said there was a 1:1 correlation between their socionics type and their MBTI type, and 50% said there wasn't, given that types are equally distributed(are they?), it would mean that there is a pretty strong correlation between the two systems. Why is that so? Well, we have 16 types, if equally distributed - than every type - 6.25% of socion. If there is no correlation between the two than one would expect for example that all MBTI ESTPs and other types would be approximatelly equally distributed along the socionics types(that meaninig 6.25% of MBTI ESTPs would be socionics ESTps, ILIs, IEIs etc.). But if 50% of ESTPs are SLEs, than, that's a good one correlation.

  35. #35
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    So...if 21 people voted that they have the same Thinking/Feeling dichotomy...there are 11 votes for a difference in the I/E, I/S, and J/P dichotomies. In addition, because it is known that 28 people voted, it can be calculated how many votes were not used because people weren't sure if one of the dichotomies was the same or different. For the I/E, I/S, and J/P dichotomies, this is 6 votes.

    This could mean that of the 21 people who voted that they have the same Thinking/Feeling dichotomy in both systems, 17 of them could be different in one other dichotomy, or be uncertain. 4/21 = 19%, or 14% of the people who took part.

  36. #36
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,428
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I keep wondering what numbers people would like to see, before they call this a correlation.

    Remarks like 'there's no correlation at all' seem a bit to unjustifitied.

  37. #37
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm certain that atleast a few voted the same type for MBTI and socionics because they don't know the difference. This number could definitely be bigger.

  38. #38
    Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    9,168
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This kind of thing makes me think that maybe I am an ESTP in MBTI. It's plausible. I'm more of an ESTP than I am an ESTJ. It's just that I think ENTJ > ESTP.

  39. #39
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    It's just that I think ENTJ > ESTP.
    Well yeah. MBTI Te is in some ways described similarly to .

    I hate when people say MBTI Ne is socionics Ne. "No, because MBTI is a different theory than socionics. Two interpretations of Jung that look at two different elements of personality and have two different sets of dichotomies, that, get this, used one set of 16 types and one set of 8 letters." Bad call. They're the same people who think socionics P is MBTI P, J for J, which completely contradicts their previous statement. Just die already.

  40. #40
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,428
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by polikujm View Post
    Well yeah. MBTI Te is in some ways described similarly to .

    I hate when people say MBTI Ne is socionics Ne. "No, because MBTI is a different theory than socionics. Two interpretations of Jung that look at two different elements of personality and have two different sets of dichotomies, that, get this, used one set of 16 types and one set of 8 letters." Bad call. They're the same people who think socionics P is MBTI P, J for J, which completely contradicts their previous statement. Just die already.
    I don't think there is anyone who defends MBTI functions, since they are buggy as hell and should be ignored.

    Their descriptions however are obvious similar. ISTP who's a master of tools in both theories for example. That's not a difference, but a striking similarity.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •