Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Read it and weep: why I'm SEI

  1. #1
    Creepy-male

    Default Read it and weep: why I'm SEI.

    "Although Dee is preoccupied with the logical categories of socionics and with suggesting new ideas and hypotheses, I feel he does so not as an or dominant would. He seems to generate discussion by suggesting possibilities than actually carefully expounding ideas in depth as is generally typical of LIIs and ILEs with interests in abstract theories such as socionics. In contrast, Dee's hypotheses sound more like quickly asked questions or a stream of consciousness. The clincher in my mind is really that there is so much expressiveness in his writing."

    Relevant points bolded. The Rick has spoken. (Especially the part about stream-of-consciousness... seriously, when the hell did that become the exclusive domain of Ne? Sorry, guys. But no.)

    User:Admin/userlist - Wikisocion

  2. #2
    Snomunegot munenori2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    TIM
    Introvert sp/sx
    Posts
    7,739
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You've never met dee, have you?
    Moonlight will fall
    Winter will end
    Harvest will come
    Your heart will mend

  3. #3
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Was I supposed to have?

    I remember labcoat saying I was indecisive-wing-confused dee subtype though.

  4. #4
    Creepy-male

    Default

    I'm sorry for being boring, Glam.

    Sheesh.

    Why don't I just graft a giant meathook onto my back?!

  5. #5
    kensi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Edmonton, Ab, Canada
    Posts
    567
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gulanzon View Post
    "Although Dee is preoccupied with the logical categories of socionics and with suggesting new ideas and hypotheses, I feel he does so not as an or dominant would. He seems to generate discussion by suggesting possibilities than actually carefully expounding ideas in depth as is generally typical of LIIs and ILEs with interests in abstract theories such as socionics. In contrast, Dee's hypotheses sound more like quickly asked questions or a stream of consciousness. The clincher in my mind is really that there is so much expressiveness in his writing."

    Relevant points bolded. The Rick has spoken. (Especially the part about stream-of-consciousness... seriously, when the hell did that become the exclusive domain of Ne? Sorry, guys. But no.)

    User:Admin/userlist - Wikisocion
    i dont know Dee, but i like the way you worded this. I like how you seperated the dualistic tendancies with your statements. It is very much possible to act like your dual to a limited extent of context. What complicates things overall is that there may be more than 32 types of people and an additional dichotomy in the mix of things but not consciously identifiable produces a compromised position between any 2 already existing dichotomies talked about including the 2 herein. Thus it is possible to go around in circles with analysis'.
    ENTP:wink:ALPHA

  6. #6
    xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,464
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think Gulanzon's sense of alluringly weird humour has similarities to Andy Kauffman's and Robin Williams'. He's still young though, and I kind've, sortive acted as crazy as him a couple years ago. :wink:

    And yes, Ne is not the MBTI-esque stream of brilliance everyone thinks it is. Gulenko basically agrees that dynamics have an easier time making random associations, and statics suffer from "lethargy" when making new associations. (See the forms of thinking article). But none of this is readily quantifiable, so it's probably a bad criteria to type on.

  7. #7
    Snomunegot munenori2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    TIM
    Introvert sp/sx
    Posts
    7,739
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dee was dee. People gave him a hard time because he was incoherent in socionics, but he was a really friendly, nice guy. Oh the days when he thought I was ILI...

    I wish his posts were still here!
    Moonlight will fall
    Winter will end
    Harvest will come
    Your heart will mend

  8. #8
    Landlord of the Dog and Duck Subteigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    EII-Ne Sp/So
    Posts
    14,936
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    The End Times are coming. Be wary of False Prophets.

  9. #9
    xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,464
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    dee was one of my favourite posters here. I'll forever miss him and his complete logical incoherence in socionics. Duality hath spoken!

  10. #10
    Currently God Brilliand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nevada
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    4,246
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subterranean View Post
    The End Times are coming. Be wary of False Prophets.



    LII-Ne

    "Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
    - Blair Houghton

    Johari

  11. #11
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    I think Gulanzon's sense of alluringly weird humour has similarities to Andy Kauffman's and Robin Williams'. He's still young though, and I kind've, sortive acted as crazy as him a couple years ago. :wink:

    And yes, Ne is not the MBTI-esque stream of brilliance everyone thinks it is. Gulenko basically agrees that dynamics have an easier time making random associations, and statics suffer from "lethargy" when making new associations. (See the forms of thinking article). But none of this is readily quantifiable, so it's probably a bad criteria to type on.
    Related: I'm still a MBTI ENFP. I'm going to steal that from my argument for ESE... so is Robin Williams. And guess what? Some people type him as Ne-base.

    Quote Originally Posted by glamourama View Post
    no no, I wasn't comparing - I was just remembering dee!
    K, well, I'm still gonna graft that meathook onto my back.

    I got my glam from a meathook meathook meathook meathook meathook meathook meathook!



    EDIT

    Quote Originally Posted by Subterranean View Post
    The End Times are coming. Be wary of False Prophets.
    No point hiding it anymore. *changes usertitle*

  12. #12
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Oh Carla, you have much to learn.

    I'm a Six Nine, I need to define myself through external means. Sort of like a wrist brace to fight back the carpal tunnel pain of being a goopy, indefinite mass of human experience.

    EDIT

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    dee was one of my favourite posters here. I'll forever miss him and his complete logical incoherence in socionics. Duality hath spoken!
    Can we be duals?


  13. #13
    xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,464
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gulanzon View Post

    Can we be duals?

    Deeanzon? Gulandee?

  14. #14
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Deelanzog.

    Sounds suitable evil too. Nye he he he...

    EDIT.

    Wait, no. I've got it.

    I can be Gulanzon, and you can be jxrtes. However, instead of duals, we'll be DEEALS.

    Hoho!
    Last edited by male; 04-24-2009 at 10:52 PM.

  15. #15
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gulanzon View Post
    "Although Dee is preoccupied with the logical categories of socionics and with suggesting new ideas and hypotheses, I feel he does so not as an or dominant would. He seems to generate discussion by suggesting possibilities than actually carefully expounding ideas in depth as is generally typical of LIIs and ILEs with interests in abstract theories such as socionics. In contrast, Dee's hypotheses sound more like quickly asked questions or a stream of consciousness. The clincher in my mind is really that there is so much expressiveness in his writing."

    Relevant points bolded. The Rick has spoken. (Especially the part about stream-of-consciousness... seriously, when the hell did that become the exclusive domain of Ne? Sorry, guys. But no.)

    User:Admin/userlist - Wikisocion
    I normally wouldn't agree with little justifications like this (nor would I be totally disposed to accept lengthier discourses, like UDP's for example), but in this case, I actually agree with you. Okay, you may not have met dee, but this is definitely representative of you. You simply don't expound on ideas in the same way as ILEs JRiddy and Steve do. In fact, I think it's pretty evident that you're not a logical type. At the same time, Alpha is basically a given. And since I see more of Kamajama and bee (SEIs) in you than I do cracka (ESE), I think SEI fits nicely.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •