Lol u guys

[Creepy-male]

I'm ILE again.

SEI had such a short run, lol.

[munenori2]

Hahahahahahaha.

Welcome back!

[Creepy-male]

Awesome, I get to be mune's dual.

And being so support explains why I don't avoid my PoLR. Woot.

[Wynch]

YAY!!!!!

*WILD APPLAUSE!*

[Creepy-male]

Oh, I get it now.

You just didn't want me to be your dual.

</3

[Creepy-male]

No, wait.

I'm back to SEI 9w1.

I forgot that ILE doesn't work with intertypes. \:

Why must this be so hard? Gah!

[Mattie]

I think you should just be typeless until you figure it out for sure. You're switching too frequently to seem serious about finding your actual type.

[Creepy-male]

Well, if I don't talk about my conclusions, how do I know if they're right?

You're a Delta, you wouldn't understand

[Wynch]

Saying you have weak Ne is kind of ludicrous to me. Weak Ne is the opposite of what you have.

[Creepy-male]

Saying you have weak Ne is kind of ludicrous to me. Weak Ne is the opposite of what you have.

(click me)

EDIT

And FWIW, I'm always afraid to click on "show new posts" when you and Yake start posting. You make me anxious about Logik Fites

(That's Si.)

[Gilly]

I disagree.

IEE, EIE, ESE, SEI...these I could see. But not ILE.

[Creepy-Cyclops]

I think your Fe is quite apparent, but you seem to me too detached from reality to be a sensing type. I think you were close when you had Fe as your leading function but not ESE. More like EIE.

DeAnte and WP would then be your duals and Brilliand and other INTj's your semi-duals.

[Creepy-male]

Really? I'd say I'm very based in reality. That I have trouble moving my head through time is one of the reasons I get so confused.

Also, I don't identify with Betas. I've been in Beta groups... I generally feel like I've been pushed to the side there.

Perhaps what you're seeing, Cyclops, is that Fe is more whimsical than SLI? I know I see SLIs as being far more stable as me, even though we're both technically IP.