Type this philosophy:

[Gilly]

"When life isn't fair, cheat."

[1981slater]

"When life isn't fair, cheat."

bart simpson

[Gilly]

ssshhhh...

[Brilliand]

It has to be both and PoLR. Strong base subtype?

[Ezra]

It has to be both and PoLR. Strong base subtype?

Sorry, that just couldn't work. If it's evidence for Ti PoLR and Fi PoLR, but the type is Se base, then it must be both SEE and SLE and cannot be both SEE and SLE.

Why must it be these PoLRs? (I'm not so much as disagreeing with your fundamental idea, I'm more criticising your logic.)

[Gilly]

Because IJ functions judge "fairness." However I see it as at least considering what is "fair," but using means to go "around" this judgment when abiding by it isn't in tune with the user's particular perception of "fair," or is just a general excuse for getting one's own way.

It's a favorite quote of my SLE roommate. He's basically kind of like an sp/sx version of Ezra with a 4 fix.

[Jarno]

yeah I like that idea too.

[Ezra]

He's basically kind of like an sp/sx version of Ezra with a 4 fix.

I am sp/sx.

(Obviously I'm not Four fix, though.)

[Ezra]

Yes, I like Emo Phillips.

"A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing."

[Gilly]

heh sounds like SLE to me.