Which type description(s)

[Minde]

...of your own type do you like the best?

[aestrivex]

i'll go with the one i wrote.

[Minde]

i'll go with the one i wrote.

Which is...?

[jessica129]

I think Niffweed made this one

SLI - WSWiki

That's the best one I've ever come across.

[Warlord]

The one on this site:
Psychological Types

[cracka]

My favorite one for ESE:
ESE - WSWiki

[Ritella]

My favorite one for ESE:
ESE - WSWiki

lol

[07490]

I dont trust Wikisocion, some of the intertype relationship is described like someone's own personal experiences with the relationship and then writing it in their word by word. It is lacking the fundamental depth of how the relationship works.

[Ezra]

The description of the SLE that I wrote (with a few touches from niffweed). I won't claim credit for any of the actual material - it's merely a conglomeration of all the descriptions of the SLE that I have read and recorded as being decent.

[aestrivex]

The description of the SLE that I wrote (with a few touches from niffweed). I won't claim credit for any of the actual material - it's merely a conglomeration of all the descriptions of the SLE that I have read and recorded as being decent.

the one i edited is the one on wswiki as opposed to that one.

[duality is cringe]

The one on "Rick's blog" and the WSwiki (already posted) are the better ones out there IMO.

[Minde]

Socionics Workshop wiki ILI description

Ah, thanks.

My favorite one for ESE:
ESE - WSWiki

Haha.



I'm not sure if it signifies anything, but so far it's been irrationals, mainly IPs, who have responded. (Sorry, Cracka, you don't count.) Do you rationals have some sort of grudge against type descriptions or something?

[Logos]

I'm not sure if it signifies anything, but so far it's been irrationals, mainly IPs, who have responded. (Sorry, Cracka, you don't count.) Do you rationals have some sort of grudge against type descriptions or something?

There is little reason to think that.

[Minde]

There is little reason to think that.

True, but it's an interesting possibility.

So, Logos, which type description(s) do you like best and find most applicable to yourself?

[Creepy-male]

The wikisocion makes as much headway as it produces errors. The Socionist makes me sound so empty and frivolous (I think this is more related to the fact that I'm one of those freakishly rare ENFP 7w6 ESEs).

So, I'm going to go with socionics.com. It's nicely general, and captures a good deal about who I think I am. Additionally,

ESFjs usually have a straight, upright posture and the body itself is often firm and slim. In fact it is rare to find an ESFjwith a full figure, especially a male.

That is all.

[Logos]

True, but it's an interesting possibility.

So, Logos, which type description(s) do you like best and find most applicable to yourself?

LII WikiSocion Page: Thehotelambush (and other contributors) really did a fantastic job of providing a thorough (but not too personal specific), basic description of the LII.

LII on Psychological Types: If you can get through the muddled English translation in spots, then this description also provides a nice description of LIIs that coves a wide range of dimensions to the LII personality, lifestyle, and behavior. Again it is not perfect.

While I do not have a grudge against type descriptions, I have noticed that a number of descriptions seem to almost overemphasize certain qualities to unrealistic proportions. This can alienate individuals from identifying their correct type. For example, there are a number of LII type descriptions that exaggerate the extent to which an LII spends their time systematizing, subordinating the world to logical systems, or their love for order, etc. Or sometimes descriptions produce too strong of a wording, as in the Stratievskaya LII description: "A LII is always politically active (a quality inherent in all representatives of the first and second quadras). LIIs are always troubled by the problems of the society in which they live, as well as the social and humanitarian problems around it."

[Ezra]

the one i edited is the one on wswiki as opposed to that one.

Okay, well, both are good anyway.

[Logos]

And then you get those type descriptions that like to believe that all LIIs live extraordinarily regimented lifestyles with OCD.

[krieger]

Or sometimes descriptions produce too strong of a wording, as in the Stratievskaya LII description: "A LII is always politically active (a quality inherent in all representatives of the first and second quadras). LIIs are always troubled by the problems of the society in which they live, as well as the social and humanitarian problems around it."

Lol. Not only is wording terrible, the message itself is just weird. I've never been able to stand politics much and as far as I'm aware the political activity of any INTj is restricted to protecting their personal environment so they don't have to put up with bull-shit from outside. I always cringed when mr. P took those lines seriously.

[jason_m]

The one on socioscope.com. It's very hard to read, because it can only be read through a Russian to English machine translation, but, for me, it's spot on.

Jason