Is this a reasonably good socionics test?
Mizami: Registreer jezelf nu!
It's longer than most and it's relatively thorough..
i got
IEE Your result
ILE These types might also be considered
IEI
EIE
SEE These types are not very likely
ILI
LIE
EII
SLE These types are quite unlikely
SEI
ESE
LII
SLI these types are extremely unlikely
LSE
ESI
LSI
That's really one of the only accurate tests I think I've come across.SLI Your result
SEI These types might also be considered
SLE
ILI
SEE These types are not very likely
IEI
ILE
LSI
IEE These types are quite unlikely
ESI
LSE
LII
ESE these types are extremely unlikely
EII
LIE
EIE
That's Rick's test isn't it? I think it is accurate.
Test results
IEE Your result
EIE These types might also be considered
IEI
SEE
EII These types are not very likely
ESE
ILE
SEI
LIE These types are quite unlikely
ESI
ILI
SLE
LII these types are extremely unlikely
LSE
SLI
LSI
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
damnit
EIE Your result
EII These types might also be considered
IEE
IEI
LIE These types are not very likely
ESE
LII
ESI
ILE These types are quite unlikely
SEE
ILI
SEI
LSE these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
SLE
SLI
Apparently I'm incredibly NF and not in the least ST.
Last edited by Ritella; 03-27-2009 at 10:51 AM.
EII; E6(w5)
i am flakey
This is Rick's test, I believe.
@Ritella: true colours revealed. Come join Beta now. You know what you are.
SLE Your result
LSE These types might also be considered
ILE
LIE
SLI These types are not very likely
LSI
ILI
SEE
LII These types are quite unlikely
ESE
IEE
EIE
SEI these types are extremely unlikely
ESI
IEI
EII
ha! Drag me kicking and screaming.Originally Posted by Ezra
@Ritella: true colours revealed
Though, I am happy to come voluntarily for parties and other festivities.
EII; E6(w5)
i am flakey
A HA HA HA. Told you soESE Your result
SEE These types might also be considered
ESI
SEI
EIE These types are not very likely
LSE
IEE
SLE
EII These types are quite unlikely
LSI
IEI
SLI
LIE these types are extremely unlikely
ILE
LII
ILI
I like this test, actually. It uses plain English. I find it hard to see problems with it... but, as always, it might only be testing someone's mask. But, short of an interview/biography study, imo, this is the next best thing.
After spending all that time doing the test, figured I might as well share the results.
Test results
LSI Your result
LSE These types might also be considered
LII
LIE
SLI These types are not very likely
SLE
ILI
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
ESE
EII
EIE
SEI these types are extremely unlikely
SEE
IEI
IEE
allez cuisine!
LSI Your result
SLI These types might also be considered
ESI
LII
LSE These types are not very likely
SEI
ILI
SLE
EII These types are quite unlikely
ESE
LIE
IEI
SEE these types are extremely unlikely
ILE
EIE
IEE
Apparently we're still duals, Ritella!
IEE Your result
IEI These types might also be considered
EIE
SEE
EII These types are not very likely
SEI
ESE
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
ILI
LIE
SLE
LII These types are extremely unlikely
SLI
LSE
LSI
Hmmm, do all IEI's end up IEE's in this test? And what is up with all the SEE? I made it once before and got SEE followed by SLE (my dual) - isn't that what Brilliand and Warlord got too? Maybe there is a bug somewhere....
INFp
If your sea chart does not match reality, go with reality (Old mariner saying)
SEE Your result
SLE These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI
IEI These types are not very likely
SEI
SLI
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EIE
ESE
LII these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
EII
LIEI must have done something very wrong.
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
Hmm... those are the exactly same results as what I got. I doubt we answered exactly same to the questions. The test must be broken, so it sometimes gives that set of results, regardless what the person answered. When I answered the test, I answered during a long course of time. Maybe it forgot what I had answered, and gave that default result. Or sometimes it just for some other reason gives that set of results. Probably BP got the exact same set of results.
Now there are probably people around who have taken that test, and thinking they are SEE's
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
Ok, I redid the test, and now I got:
ILI Your result
LIE These types might also be considered
ILE
LII
SLI These types are not very likely
IEI
LSI
SLE
EII These types are quite unlikely
IEE
LSE
EIE
SEI these types are extremely unlikely
ESI
SEE
ESE
And I didn't change any of the answers, and yes I do remember the answers that I answered last time
It's quite good test, when it works.
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
I tried to click the "Finish" button.
That's probably it - I did walk away from the test for a few hours in the middle.Hmm... those are the exactly same results as what I got. I doubt we answered exactly same to the questions. The test must be broken, so it sometimes gives that set of results, regardless what the person answered. When I answered the test, I answered during a long course of time. Maybe it forgot what I had answered, and gave that default result. Or sometimes it just for some other reason gives that set of results. Probably BP got the exact same set of results.
Now there are probably people around who have taken that test, and thinking they are SEE's
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
same. problem solved.
ILE-Ti
6w7 sx/sp (low level of confidence)
The test seems to confuse social extroversion with temperamental introversion. Relates to the above ENFp-INFp controversy.
First eliminate every possible source of error. Thence success is inevitable.
I took it again. I'm pretty sure that I answered some of the questions slightly differently, but not radically so.
IEE Your result
SEE These types might also be considered
IEI
ILE
EIE These types are not very likely
SEI
SLE
ILI
ESE These types are quite unlikely
EII
LIE
SLI
ESI these types are extremely unlikely
LSE
LII
LSI
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
tereg's sig is getting shaky...
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
ILE Your result
ILI These types might also be considered
LIE
IEE
LII These types are not very likely
SLE
IEI
SLI
EIE These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EII
SEE
LSI These types are extremely unlikely
SEI
ESE
ESI
I happen to be informed by someone who participated in the making of that site (he bought my socionics.nl domain)
It seems that the test was made with the help of Rick.
It's the first socionics dating site in hollland, yet it is somewhat spiritual based. I hope that Rick had a big influence in the test.
BTW a test can be considered reliable when > 75% of the results are the correct type.
At least this is how MBTI works... I would expect Socionics to get a bit more higher score, since they have somewhat more and accurate methods of typing.
OK, I redid the test more quickly.
ILE Your result
LIE These types might also be considered
ILI
LII
IEE These types are not very likely
EIE
IEI
EII
SLE These types are quite unlikely
LSE
SLI
LSI
SEE these types are extremely unlikely
ESE
SEI
ESI
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
omg/wtf/rofl/*squeek*, I got ESE! (and I've been tested SEI mostly but that may be MBTI... is socionics so drastically different? I want more information.)
lol you sound ESE. Make a post in "what's my type"
ILE-Ti
6w7 sx/sp (low level of confidence)
Everyone and their mother seems to be IEE, jeez
EIE Your result
EII These types might also be considered
IEE
LIE
IEI These types are not very likely
ESE
LII
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
SEE
ILI
LSE
SEI these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
SLE
SLI
This is a good test, I think, I actually did not expect to get EIE.
(D)IEE~FI-(C)SLE~Ni E-5w4(Sp/Sx)/7w8(So/Sp)/9w1(sp/sx)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
