Is this a reasonably good socionics test?

[Cheesy]

Mizami: Registreer jezelf nu!

It's longer than most and it's relatively thorough..

i got

IEE Your result
ILE These types might also be considered
IEI
EIE
SEE These types are not very likely
ILI
LIE
EII
SLE These types are quite unlikely
SEI
ESE
LII
SLI these types are extremely unlikely
LSE
ESI
LSI

[jessica129]

SLI Your result

SEI These types might also be considered
SLE
ILI

SEE These types are not very likely
IEI
ILE
LSI

IEE These types are quite unlikely
ESI
LSE
LII

ESE these types are extremely unlikely
EII
LIE
EIE

That's really one of the only accurate tests I think I've come across.

[Simon Ssmall]

That's Rick's test isn't it? I think it is accurate.

Test results
IEE Your result
EIE These types might also be considered
IEI
SEE
EII These types are not very likely
ESE
ILE
SEI
LIE These types are quite unlikely
ESI
ILI
SLE
LII these types are extremely unlikely
LSE
SLI
LSI

[Ritella]

damnit

EIE Your result
EII These types might also be considered
IEE
IEI
LIE These types are not very likely
ESE
LII
ESI
ILE These types are quite unlikely
SEE
ILI
SEI
LSE these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
SLE
SLI

Apparently I'm incredibly NF and not in the least ST.

[Ezra]

This is Rick's test, I believe.

@Ritella: true colours revealed . Come join Beta now. You know what you are.

SLE Your result

LSE These types might also be considered
ILE
LIE
SLI These types are not very likely
LSI
ILI
SEE
LII These types are quite unlikely
ESE
IEE
EIE
SEI these types are extremely unlikely
ESI
IEI
EII

[Creepy-male]

ESE Your result

SEE These types might also be considered
ESI
SEI
EIE These types are not very likely
LSE
IEE
SLE
EII These types are quite unlikely
LSI
IEI
SLI
LIE these types are extremely unlikely
ILE
LII
ILI

A HA HA HA. Told you so

I like this test, actually. It uses plain English. I find it hard to see problems with it... but, as always, it might only be testing someone's mask. But, short of an interview/biography study, imo, this is the next best thing.

[idolatrie]

After spending all that time doing the test, figured I might as well share the results.

Test results
LSI Your result
LSE These types might also be considered
LII
LIE
SLI These types are not very likely
SLE
ILI
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
ESE
EII
EIE
SEI these types are extremely unlikely
SEE
IEI
IEE

[Ritella]

@Ritella: true colours revealed . Come join Beta now. You know what you are.

ha! Drag me kicking and screaming.
Though, I am happy to come voluntarily for parties and other festivities.

[duality is cringe]

I 2nd Ritella's "damnit."

LSI Your result
SLI These types might also be considered
LII
ILI
LSE These types are not very likely
SLE
LIE
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
SEI
EII
IEI
ESE these types are extremely unlikely
SEE
EIE
IEE

Between this and Hugo's type indicator v.6, my results are often treading a thin line between SLI-Te and LSI-Ti.

Pretty good!

Even though you scored as IEE and type yourself as IEI? What did you like about it?

[jessica129]

I 2nd Ritella's "damnit."

Do you agree with it? I wish this test gave some sort of percentage for each type.

Maybe after seeing my results people will stop suggesting LSI for me

[Sirena]

Test results
IEI Your result
IEE These types might also be considered
EII
EIE
SEI These types are not very likely
ILI
SEE
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
LII
ESE
LIE
SLI these types are extremely unlikely
SLE
LSI
LSE

Great test!

[Sirena]

damnit

EIE Your result

Come come come to Beta!!! I want you to be my mirror again.

I 2nd Ritella's "damnit."



Between this and Hugo's type indicator v.6, my results are often treading a thin line between SLI-Te and LSI-Ti.

Yes! yes! yessssssssss!!!!!!!!! I knew it, I knew it. I told you so. :tongue:
Give it up already.

Seriously...I have a feeling about you. Have you ever seriously looked into this possibility?

You do remind me of those LSI comic characters you posted about one time. (and yes, I know you complained about using that to suggest your type)

[Creepy-male]

Even though you scored as IEE and type yourself as IEI? What did you like about it?

Just guessing, but from dichotomies...

There's actually a pretty strong match between IEE and IEI. It's not really a very big miss at all.

[duality is cringe]

Do you agree with it?

No.

I wish this test gave some sort of percentage for each type.

Ditto.

Maybe after seeing my results people will stop suggesting LSI for me

From what I've observed, most here with a fairly accurate, non-distorted perception of you (not niffweed17) and have a good understanding of how valued information elements manifest IRL, seem to agree with SLI for you.

[tereg]

IEE Your result

IEI These types might also be considered
SEE
ILE

SEI These types are not very likely
EIE
ILI
SLE

EII These types are quite unlikely
ESE
SLI
LIE

ESI these types are extremely unlikely
LII
LSE
LSI

hmm

[duality is cringe]

Just guessing, but from dichotomies...

There's actually a pretty strong match between IEE and IEI. It's not really a very big miss at all.

Perhaps, but IEI (his/her self typing) was third down from IEE. Assuming these test results are ranked in order from most likely to least likely, I wouldn't have thought someone would be inclined to regard this test as anything particularly special if it had given them a "wrong" type and placed their "correct" typing three options down.

Just seemed weird to me.

@ tereg, any opinions about your test result? Aside from the always genius "." comment?

[tereg]

@ tereg, any opinions about your test result? Aside from the always genius "." comment?

A feeling of "back to the drawing board" or general feelings of self-doubt again.

Edit: Probably strong enough for me to consider stripping my signature again.

[DirectorAbbie]

damnit

EIE Your result
EII These types might also be considered
IEE
IEI
LIE These types are not very likely
ESE
LII
ESI
ILE These types are quite unlikely
SEE
ILI
SEI
LSE these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
SLE
SLI

Apparently I'm incredibly NF and not in the least ST.

LSI Your result
SLI These types might also be considered
ESI
LII
LSE These types are not very likely
SEI
ILI
SLE
EII These types are quite unlikely
ESE
LIE
IEI
SEE these types are extremely unlikely
ILE
EIE
IEE

Apparently we're still duals, Ritella!

[duality is cringe]

Have you ever seriously looked into this possibility?

I have looked into the possibility of few types and dismissed them for a number of valid reasons, the strongest being intertype relations, pointing overwhelmingly toward SLI.

I am not in any doubt.

[tereg]

A feeling of "back to the drawing board" or general feelings of self-doubt again.

Edit: Probably strong enough for me to consider stripping my signature again.

Either that or I'm not being true to myself when I do these tests, which I'm always acutely aware of avoiding when taking tests like these.

[tiny_dancer]

Probably strong enough for me to consider stripping my signature again.

doh!

I met an IEE last weekend who reminded me of you (by the way). He was very chill.

[Wynch]

ILE Your result
SLE These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI

SEE These types are not very likely
SLI
IEI
LIE

SEI These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EIE
LII

ESE these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
EII
ESI

As if there was any doubt, however lol@ILI

[Warlord]

SEE Your result

SLE These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI

IEI These types are not very likely
SEI
SLI
ILE

ESI These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EIE
ESE

LII these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
EII
LIE

lol

[1981slater]

IEE

nf
nt
sf
st

ep
ip
ej
ij

[Banana Pancakes]

SEE

[Creepy-male]

SEE

I honestly didn't SEE that coming.

[Banana Pancakes]

I honestly didn't SEE that coming.

well played, sir.

I took it a second time and it came out right:

ILE Your result
ILI These types might also be considered
LIE
SLE
LII These types are not very likely
IEE
SLI
IEI
LSE These types are quite unlikely
EIE
LSI
SEE
EII these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
ESE
ESI

[Ezra]

well played, sir.

I took it a second time and it came out right:

That's because you wanted it to.

[1981slater]

Most socionics tests type me as some sort of logical type (usually ILI), simply because I like and am good at science and analytical thinking. In Myer-Briggs, I tend to get INTP as well. At some point idolatrie and unefille tried to convince me I was ILI, but I never felt comfortable with that typing.

Forget about MBTI

[Brilliand]

SEE Your result
SLE These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI
IEI These types are not very likely
SEI
SLI
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EIE
ESE
LII these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
EII
LIE

I must have done something very wrong.

[xerx]

ILE Your result

ILI These types might also be considered
LIE
IEE

LII These types are not very likely
SLE
IEI
SLI

EIE These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EII
SEE

LSI These types are extremely unlikely
SEI
ESE
ESI

[Warlord]

I must have done something very wrong.

Hmm... those are the exactly same results as what I got. I doubt we answered exactly same to the questions. The test must be broken, so it sometimes gives that set of results, regardless what the person answered. When I answered the test, I answered during a long course of time. Maybe it forgot what I had answered, and gave that default result. Or sometimes it just for some other reason gives that set of results. Probably BP got the exact same set of results.

Now there are probably people around who have taken that test, and thinking they are SEE's

[Warlord]

Ok, I redid the test, and now I got:

ILI Your result

LIE These types might also be considered
ILE
LII

SLI These types are not very likely
IEI
LSI
SLE

EII These types are quite unlikely
IEE
LSE
EIE

SEI these types are extremely unlikely
ESI
SEE
ESE

And I didn't change any of the answers, and yes I do remember the answers that I answered last time

It's quite good test, when it works.

[munenori2]

[Creepy-male]

I tried to click the "Finish" button.

[Park]

This is a very old test... perhaps it's been revised?

It's funny though how my results came out divided into clubs.

[Jarno]

Mizami: Registreer jezelf nu!

I happen to be informed by someone who participated in the making of that site (he bought my socionics.nl domain)

It seems that the test was made with the help of Rick.

It's the first socionics dating site in hollland, yet it is somewhat spiritual based. I hope that Rick had a big influence in the test.

BTW a test can be considered reliable when > 75% of the results are the correct type.
At least this is how MBTI works... I would expect Socionics to get a bit more higher score, since they have somewhat more and accurate methods of typing.

[sigma]

It is a test that got me so excited while doing it... and so disappointed when I saw the result.

Test results
IEE Your result
IEI These types might also be considered
EIE
EII
SEE These types are not very likely
SEI
ILE
ILI
ESE These types are quite unlikely
ESI
LIE
LII
SLE these types are extremely unlikely
SLI
LSE
LSI

I am no extrovert...

Is the test zooming in on the type?

Oh... am my type is IEI, so I'm covered by "These types might also be considered",

[Banana Pancakes]

That's because you wanted it to.

Yeah, you got me, I'm actually SEE, along with brilliand and warlord. We're just trying to infiltrate the other quadras and spy on them.

[Brilliand]

Hmm... those are the exactly same results as what I got. I doubt we answered exactly same to the questions. The test must be broken, so it sometimes gives that set of results, regardless what the person answered. When I answered the test, I answered during a long course of time. Maybe it forgot what I had answered, and gave that default result. Or sometimes it just for some other reason gives that set of results. Probably BP got the exact same set of results.

Now there are probably people around who have taken that test, and thinking they are SEE's

That's probably it - I did walk away from the test for a few hours in the middle.