Repost of "Bartle type and information elements" by Gulanzon

[tereg]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartle_Test The Bartle test divides game players into four camps: "Achievers" (Diamonds), "Explorers" (Spades), "Killers" (Clubs) and "Socials" (Hearts). Explorers love the experience of uncovering new areas, or new game mechanics. Killers are self-explanatory. They also enjoy competition in general, even if said competition doesn't include "slaughter". Socials... are self-explanatory. Achievers like to have things to show that they've earned them. Levels, obscure loot, notoriety... More detailed profiles in the wiki link.

.

[tereg]

SFs as Ks, STs as As, NTs as Es, NFs as Ss? What's the problem with Delta STs? All the ones I know are grindaholics.

.

[tereg]

Let's talk about the achievements we would gain from killing those who stand in the way of exploration. Omnipotence & Socionics: "Because everything correlates."

.

[tereg]

Let's talk about the achievements we would gain from killing those who stand in the way of exploration. Omnipotence & Socionics: "Because everything correlates."

wtf allie? :tongue:

.

[tereg]

Allie is on a power trip (: Allie is cute like that :redface:

.

[tereg]

My brother would probably be an explorer. I'm more of social with some killer aspects, minus the drama and ganking. Achiever was the only one that's nothing like me.

.

[tereg]

im explorer most deff I got EwS

.

[tereg]

E 93 A 47 S 40 K 20 Not that I spend a whole lot of time on MMORPGs ... they're too repetitive. I got more interesting things to do. (But then again, that would probably also be why I'm an "explorer" gamer type)

.

[tereg]

I'm an Explorer myself... Strategic probably shows in my gameplay as well. I'll put a lot of thought into building up an optimal force, but if I run into something that's a meaningful threat to my optimal force, I don't like it. I normally won't explore something that I'm certain won't give me any strategic advantage.

.

[tereg]

I.......what?!? o_o

.