Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Cross-types

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Cross-types ...

    Anyone know anything about them?

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Guides

    17) ExFJ: The Teacher

    18) ExFP: The Star

    19) ExTJ: The Enforcer

    20) ExTP: The Engineer

    21) IxFJ: The Scribe

    22) IxFP: The Romantic

    23) IxTJ: The Administrator

    24) IxTP: The Operator


    Luminaries

    25) ESFx: The Populist

    26) ESTx: The Showman

    27) ENFx: The Actor

    28) ENTx: The Organizer

    29) ISFx: The Priest

    30) ISTx: The Historian

    31) INFx: The Counselor

    32) INTx: The Relativist


    Figures

    33) xSFJ: The Facilitator

    34) xSFP: The Herald

    35) xSTP: The Promoter

    36) xSTJ: The Sergent

    37) xNFJ: The Sage

    38) xNFP: The Crusader

    39) xNTJ: The Chieftan

    40) xNTP: The Networker


    Adventurers

    41) ESxJ: The Cultist

    42) ESxP: The Explorer

    43) ENxJ: The Ringleader

    44) ENxP: The Revealer

    45) ISxJ: The Inhibitor

    46) ISxP: The Rebel

    47) INxJ: The Maverick

    48) INxP: The Escapist


    Proletarians

    49) xSFx: The Bishop

    50) xSTx: The Revolutionary

    51) xNFx: The Healer

    52) xNTx: The Commander


    Tribunes

    53) xxFJ: The Conductor

    54) xxFP: The Harmonizer

    55) xxTJ: The Director

    56) xxTP: The Planner


    Narcissists

    57) xSxJ: The Conservator

    58) xSxP: The Dictator

    59) xNxJ: The Insurgent

    60) xNxP: The Interloper


    Destinies

    61) ExFx: The Celebrity

    62) ExTx: The Aristocrat

    63) IxFx: The Strategist

    64) IxTx: The Philosopher


    Motions

    65) ExxJ: The Prosecutor

    66) ExxP: The Exhibitionist

    67) IxxP: The Illusionist

    68) IxxJ: The Instigator


    Motivators

    69) ESxx: The Craftsman

    70) ENxx: The General

    71) ISxx: The Manipulator

    72) INxx: The Seer


    Archetypes

    73) Exxx: The Diplomat

    74) Ixxx: The Mystic

    75) xSxx: The Overlord

    76) xNxx: The Nationalist

    77) xxFx: The Empath

    78) xxTx: The Logician

    79) xxxJ: The Master

    80) xxxP: The Creator

    81) xxxx: The Providentiary

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    By the way, a little disclaimer that this theory totally conflicts with established socionics theory. I am meerly asking for the simple fact that I am nuts, TCaudill is nuts, and I want to hear more about it.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    703
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ask tcaudilllg, as he's the ONLY person that speaks of them. My personal opinion of them isn't that high, but that's because it seems more like something cobbled together than the logical extension of current socionics. It also seems based on a bad premise using dichotomies instead of a functional model of the psyche. I wonder if they could have developed if socionics had never started using MB style acronyms.
    That faith makes blessed under certain circumstances, that blessedness does not make of a fixed idea a true idea, that faith moves no mountains but puts mountains where there are none: a quick walk through a madhouse enlightens one sufficiently about this. (A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.) - Friedrich Nietzsche

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niveK
    Ask tcaudilllg, as he's the ONLY person that speaks of them. My personal opinion of them isn't that high, but that's because it seems more like something cobbled together than the logical extension of current socionics. It also seems based on a bad premise using dichotomies instead of a functional model of the psyche. I wonder if they could have developed if socionics had never started using MB style acronyms.
    Hah, apparently he is the only one on google that knows anything about them. He has a webblog somewhere where he talks about them. That was basically the only link I found when I looked for it.

    And if you want my opinion, dichotomonies can not work with socionics without tooling over the theory. So, if that is basically what it is, I think it is a bad theory that is backtracking back to shitty MBTI and should be thrown away with the rest of the inferior trash.

    Now to wait for tcaudilllg to actually explain why this is a valid theory... boy I am nuts!

  6. #6
    snegledmaca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,900
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If Jungian functions are dictated by different regions of the brain then *theoretically* cross-types are possible.

  7. #7
    Cone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,717
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am seriously critical towards the idea of anatomical localization of any brain function, Socionics or not. But I digress.

    The only way I can see cross-types working is if these people were LACKING in any functional ability. Like for example, an IxFp is incapacitated in some area of functioning that both the ISFp and the INFp possess. Also, I can see using dichotomies, however the J/P axis cross implies some really strange functional crosses.
    Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)

  8. #8
    Creepy-

    Default

    Maybe tcaudilllg should come and translate these into Socionics names? (if possible)

    It appears that cross-types will lack certain weaknesses in their psyche (also certain strengths) and as a result will lack sensitivity to other peoples' weaknesses.

    i.e. An INxp (who has no PoLR) might theoretically step on other peoples' PoLR more than your regular INFp or INTp would.

    Theoretically.

    Not that INFps or INTps are regular...

  9. #9
    Creepy-pokeball

    Default

    I like #37.

  10. #10
    In Transition Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    3,695
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    If I was a crosstype I think I would be XNFP, which is the crusader.
    "Nothing happens until the pain of staying the same outweighs the pain of change."

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-4w5-9w1

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •