VI My Ex-Girlfriend

[duality is cringe]

*Gone*

[jessica129]

Is that you in the second one?

[Ritella]

you had a girlfriend in Middle School?

ummmm SEE?

[redbaron]

EIE?

[duality is cringe]

you had a girlfriend in Middle School?

Didn't most people?

[Ritella]

no idea. i have never had a bf every.

[munenori2]

no idea. i have never had a bf ever.

Me either!

[duality is cringe]

no idea. i have never had a bf every.

You are an interesting specimen.

I'd like to add that these pics were taken in present day, not the years in which we were in school.

[tereg]

Didn't most people?

[jessica129]

I didn't start dating til i was like 21, lol

But i could see ISTP for this girl.

[tereg]

Anyway, my first thought was ESTj

[xyz]

Didn't most people?

I thought that too.

[duality is cringe]

Is that you in the second one?

I am not featured in any of these pics. I am interested in everyone's VI skills/opinions.

[Creepy-Cyclops]

I don't know this one for certain but I think ISTp. Second choice is ESFj (maybe bizarely) but I think ISTp

[strrrng]

Fi-ENFp reference:

[Sirena]

Basically, the first pic had a very self-contained aspect to it—one which I have have witnessed with Fi time and time again. But Ne-ENFps are quite different looking than Fi-ENFps, so I knew the fact that it was so salient suggested Fi sub. She also seemed to be more static than dynamic; with EJ's you can sense the psychological control directed outward, and with IP's you can sense the adaptability dispersed throughout their 'field.' While she definitely seemed a bit reserved, it wasn't of the fluid IP nature, but rather, the general attitudes of deltas. After going through a few mandatory comparisons to ISFps and whatnot, the differences became clear.

In what ways do you think the two subtypes differ, looks-wise? I'm not sure what you mean by self-contained in this respect.

@DeAnte: I can't really see ENFp from those pics at all. I'm inclined to say Se ego. She seems to have that more (forceful?) look I associate with Se egos.

[strrrng]

In what ways do you think the two subtypes differ, looks-wise? I'm not sure what you mean by self-contained in this respect.

Ne-ENFp's look much more expansive than the Fi subs. With the former, the focus seems to be on discrete aspects of things—variables, processes, etc. So, while they're still static, they seem much more attuned to the aggregation of 'objects out there.' Fi subs seem more self-contained mainly because Fi is self-contained by its nature. An internal field focusing on implicit connection between two things. Most Ne subs are typically 7s, while Fi subs tend to be 6s and 9s mainly.

Sorry if that's vague. It's hard to articulate a lot of this stuff because once you get a handle on it, things become very fluid and intuitive. So, when typing people, or focusing on a specific aspect of something, I have a hard time simply isolating it as some independent entity, because one thing sort of necessitates a chain of other things. Having Ni as my main method of doing it doesn't make it easier, lol.

[Sirena]

Ne-ENFp's look much more expansive than the Fi subs. With the former, the focus seems to be on discrete aspects of things—variables, processes, etc. So, while they're still static, they seem much more attuned to the aggregation of 'objects out there.' Fi subs seem more self-contained mainly because Fi is self-contained by its nature. An internal field focusing on implicit connection between two things. Most Ne subs are typically 7s, while Fi subs tend to be 6s and 9s mainly.

Sorry if that's vague. It's hard to articulate a lot of this stuff because once you get a handle on it, things become very fluid and intuitive. So, when typing people, or focusing on a specific aspect of something, I have a hard time simply isolating it as some independent entity, because one thing sort of necessitates a chain of other things. Having Ni as my main method of doing it doesn't make it easier, lol.

Yeah, I know what you mean. Thanks for explaining! I have more questions of course. I don't want to take over the thread with my questions though so I might PM you, if that's cool with you.

[Steve]

Ne-ENFp's look much more expansive than the Fi subs. With the former, the focus seems to be on discrete aspects of things—variables, processes, etc. So, while they're still static, they seem much more attuned to the aggregation of 'objects out there.' Fi subs seem more self-contained mainly because Fi is self-contained by its nature. An internal field focusing on implicit connection between two things. Most Ne subs are typically 7s, while Fi subs tend to be 6s and 9s mainly.

Sorry if that's vague. It's hard to articulate a lot of this stuff because once you get a handle on it, things become very fluid and intuitive. So, when typing people, or focusing on a specific aspect of something, I have a hard time simply isolating it as some independent entity, because one thing sort of necessitates a chain of other things. Having Ni as my main method of doing it doesn't make it easier, lol.

Hey I get more shit than you from people about this kind of thing

[strrrng]

Hey I get more shit than you from people about this kind of thing

That's because you do it gratuitously, lol.