Normally I don't like posting one pic, but I think this one is pretty good.
Normally I don't like posting one pic, but I think this one is pretty good.
EII; E6(w5)
i am flakey
ESE-Si
he's got that sheepish, "this is somewhat awkward" SEI smile imo
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
He looks a lot like an SEI I know, and I agree about the little smile, so that's my guess.
.
The type Ritella wants to fuck? (I hope that's not her brother)
Last edited by Park; 12-14-2008 at 07:16 PM.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
if i ever hear brenden frasier has had a terrible stalking experience with some math professor ill know who it was
He radiates the gentleness I associate with SEIs.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
should i tell his type now or wait for more guesses?
EII; E6(w5)
i am flakey
should you ask that?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
(3 years ago)
Just saying...
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
okay.
Dun
Dun
Dun....
His type is...
IEE!!
a lot of people either got it or were close.
EII; E6(w5)
i am flakey
sociotype.com
LII
Hell no. He's some delta NF.Originally Posted by Winterpark
4w3-5w6-8w7
Same expression, headshot, different functions.
I'm pretty sure Tom Hanks is Fe INFp, and Tereg you look really Delta in that picture. You look more Fi in that picture than in most of your other pictures I've seen. Hanks in his picture looks Se seeking, like he's waiting in his self contained zone for something to happen, whereas you're seemingly reaching out looking to establish some consistent context.
Also he looks dynamic, you look static. The way your head and shoulders are situated look like they're just plopped there with each part standing still in this frozen position, whereas Tom Hanks looks like the pic captured him as a frame of a moving picture.
As far as the person in VId in this thread, I don't have a read yet, my first instinct was ethical.
intuitive, obviously. would guess delta nf.
asd
he's cute, Ritella.
um, Tom Hanks, IEI? blech.
IEI-Fe 4w3
hmm...I do think tereg looks more self-contained than hanks, like he's not looking to incite some reaction or anything...not sure about the Se thing. And by context, do you mean an Si context?
Maybe. Lots of factors could go into this though. All pictures are static.Also he looks dynamic, you look static. The way your head and shoulders are situated look like they're just plopped there with each part standing still in this frozen position, whereas Tom Hanks looks like the pic captured him as a frame of a moving picture.
4w3-5w6-8w7
Si and Fi. He's both looking for that continuous external context and also that kind of stable Fi-context, whereas Hanks by contrast is much more "directly reactive" to these areas and doesn't look for the same kind of continuity/stability.
What I meant was, try imagining Tereg moving vs how Tom Hanks moves - imagine the way the shoulders move relative to the head and stuff. Static types, particularly ENXps tend to move like their body consists of a pile of things and they all kind of pick up the pieces and move. Whereas IPs tend to move more as self-contained units, like atoms (movement within themselves with electrons moving about etc). It's a similarity I noticed you even have with Hanks. Whereas compare the way Tereg may move with the way I generally move.Originally Posted by strrrng