Like as an perceivingfunction taking things in, but internal, it builds up kind of a ‚inner world‘sth that resides inside but ‚consists‘ of all these things, that have been takenin. When she is now faced with someone telling her to let out more of thisinner build up ‚impression‘ she can branch it out effortless. Like I don’treally believe, that she has written down the whole tree line thing beforehandand all (mb wrong here, who knows) or like even the books are just the small fractionof the whole world - how it ‚lives‘ inside her head and when someone wants moreshe’ll be like 'sure' and can create even more or let out more of what residesinside. She has taken in so much, that she can sit down, start somewhere andthen one thing in her creation leads to another thing, that is part of this‚impressionistic world‘ and the whole thing just branches out, the whole ideasstart flowing, but it’s like tangible in the sense, that is derived from sth. -'you know what it is' and it’s just an inner subjective sense, build up of whathas been taken in.
Like this idea of the ‚Minds Eye‘ but more as anEye/Sense for various things in your immediate surrounding you dragged intoyourself. But you kinda also have a filter, like you cannot drag everything the‚whole‘ outside reality in (that's too overwhelming?, like you can experiencereality what’s ging on right now, but when you try to transport it intoyourself/a.k.a as impression you can only take in so much, like a fraction of what’s going on. You are immersed in the environment but more in the sense ofwhich impression it has on you, and therefore you are not really chimed in on what's going around in themoment in sensing terms. Also you cannot take in other environments that existsimultaneosly/parallel outside, bc you look inside. But with exposure, withchanging data/new environments taken in you get new ‚impressions‘, that need tobe build up and get more and more of this feel for your inner 'storage ofimpressions' and with that comes this inner sensing eye for this whole'holistic inner perception'/your world.
So when you want to build up this holistic innerworld it will be bound to by what you have taken in and might shift and changeor branch out with new things coming in. This takes time, becauseexperiences, like how someone has them in their live, are bound to time. Youdon’t really experience something, which hasn’t happened yet, like reallyexperiencing it in the sense of being immersed in the experience here and now,but you might ‚imagine‘ and ‚extrapolate‘ from the set of impressions youalready gathered? So there is this impressionistic, inner, build up, world ofthings taken in by ‚sensation‘ and I think it has it’s own imagination, it’sown detail, it’s own ‚eye‘ that ‚sees‘ ‚perceives‘ it. Like when people talkabout bodily sensation, that’s like going internal with this 'sense' andperceiving what’s going on in the internal realm of you, also how you havetaken outside things in and how they affect this internal sense.
Like comfort/discomfort, something feels off,what have I taken in?, like homeostasis and inner well being as this holisticsense, that’s subjective and just senses things are in balance and outside thingsinfluences alter this, hence also this sense of being dynamic and trackingoutside things, that affect you inside/your inner sense. So in her caselike having this whole inner world consisiting of the various things she hastaken in (and whatever is taken in is bound to the individual) and from thereon she can branch out and then it starts to resemble a world of their own? Likehow taxes work in the magical world, pubs, magical foods, household charms, allkinds of various personalities in the magical world (that resemble characteristicsof people here, but you know as wizards) like the zany, crazy magicalexperimentor and the crazy zany, scientist here, or the adventurer and explorerof magical animals and explorers here.
NOTE: also when taking things in, it's like stil sensory experience, so there is an awareness of outside things and how they impact you, but your 'subjective' individual take on it is favoured over the other sensory extraverted experience?