My thoughts were INTJ or ENTJ.
Could someone help me out of my dream and give some arguments that these types can be excluded? Since I still see them as slight possibilities.
My thoughts were INTJ or ENTJ.
Could someone help me out of my dream and give some arguments that these types can be excluded? Since I still see them as slight possibilities.
Well I think he's ENXj, so I'm not about to argue with you, Jarno.
ILE
7w8 so/sp
Very busy with work. Only kind of around.
Se- ISTj
Where do these LSE typings come from? He seems extremely LSI to me.
SLI
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
--> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
daniel craig's current gf looks so much like @ScarlettLux
ISTj...
Constrained, rigid, serious, solid, does not transfer confusion.
LSI-Ti.
I think SLI fits pretty well.
Lmao.. really?Originally Posted by Hotel Transylvania
Sensory type the wife seems ILI he may be either SEE or SLI I'm too tired to look up pictures
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
From my side:
That particular video could be misleading, because it is likely Ellen is his Dual...From my side:
I deliberately selected it because of that to see what happens. But he even entered like... wtf Daniel. SLI-IEE duality goes more like this:That particular video could be misleading, because it is likely Ellen is his Dual...
SLI: -_-
IEE: :-DDDD
SLI: :3
IEE: <333
He's kind of boring, very little emotional expression. Kind of dry, not much of a personality.
Found footage to contrast him with a)
What do you think?
Roast the Craig™
I'm getting sick of giving Socionics interpretations, because he could literally be any type... so I'm just going to give a non-socionics analysis/impressions, and maybe you can type that way...Found footage to contrast him with a
What do you think?
So the impression of him on that video is... he's still really boring, and he mildly irritates me for some reason. Just my own impression, not thinking about Socionics. He doesn't "give" a lot of emotion, even though technically, he's smiling and laughing etc.
The other guy (Christoph) also appears to be kind of stoic and unexpressive, but he doesn't irritate me for some reason. Actually, he appears to be considerate and good-natured, like he goes along with Graham and at least tries to be funny or make a joke or something. He's smiling a lot when things are funny and when he's enjoying himself. While Daniel Craig just kind of dryly says obvious things in a concrete way. He appears to have not much imagination. He does not appear to be very considerate or aware of others, he just cares about doing his own thing.
THAT'S MY IMPRESSION. Don't kill me.
That was actually useful! <3
According to that, Craig might have a
I'd only need your accurate type :/ Irritation points are usually indicators of Superego or having one's DS denied.
Given that both of them caused you practically reverse impressions, risky hypothesis: they are not identicals.
ISTj (not ISTp as I said earlier, let's switch the scenario upside down for this) for Waltz because well, he plays along emotionally, all with his accuracy-aiming Ti zingers. Se creative: "DON'T!"
ISTp for Craig because of his captain obvious matter-of-fact approach. Also highly physical cognition, presence, awareness.
Doing his own thing also points to self-preservation first and social blind spot. Christoph is SO/SP so there we go about instincts as well.
I was like "omg, his movements seem rigid, he must be a J type!!11" but then quickly realized that that was pretty pointless. Actually if you forget about Socionics for a bit and give an impression like that, then you won't get so caught up in trying to fit someone or some behavior into a type, and can type more accurately.
I think Daniel Craig is an SLI, and my superego.
He is so rigid because of all these damn muscles, he can't fucking move without looking like a brick ay. That's why Spongebob is supposedly his dual as well.
"Martini for 2 please"
Not a bad approach, do this more often
Hi bud, any thoughts on his wife, Rachel Weisz? I have her as SLE-Se.
SLI
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
Obvious ISTj (Maxim). People in this forum have no clue about typing. I wonder if you guys really read the theory.
ST type but I'd rule out SLE.
SLI? LSI? LSE?
I think no for LSE.
We are left with quasi-identity.
It can be tricky at times. LSI laughs easily at expression alone while SLIs smiles at something unexpected. (ILEs make good SLI torturers because they hurt their feelings while they enjoy some aspects of it. It is largely conflicted in a positive way.)
Which one? I don't know. I suspect SLI because they are quite inert to external.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
LSI
He looks like most ISTps I've seen.
enfj
Ya agree with LSI.Where do these LSE typings come from
EIE
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Daniel Craig (the new James Bond)
I started rewatching Craig’s Bond films now that I’m back from vacation. Currently watching Casino Royale and it’s mildly entertaining. Depending on the actor, Bond has been SEE, LSE, etc. For Craig as the actor, I think he’s a very serious type, Delta ST, probably SLI over LSE. He doesn’t steamroll and be overtly uncouth and pushy unlike LSE. He’s pretty well-contained, factual, straight to the point, and he doesn’t joke much. He’s polite and well-mannered, doesn’t change much facial expression nor seem to go along with the emotional atmosphere, he’s just there. If he wasn’t famous, he’d be unnoticed. Delta energy is very flat, boring, uninspiring, unchanging. He plays his Id, which is SLE so he does try to be closer to the original Bond.
Ian Fleming’s James Bond, as in the original Bond, is SLE. I think it’s because Fleming is IEI that it makes sense his idealized man be SLE. Fleming was in Naval Intelligence during WII, and didn’t see combat action and said that Bond is a culmination of all the secret agents and commando types he came across during his time in WII that he admired, including worshipping his older brother Peter who served behind the lines and fought in the war. The picture of Peter Fleming looks like how Ian Fleming imagined James Bond to look like.
D6CB6A90-91B2-47B5-994B-B177E30F59A4.jpeg
I think the actor who portrayed Bond the closest to Fleming’s vision is Sean Connery. Not surprising, as Connery is LSI and is the mirror to SLE, so he understood Bond more closely and could get Bond’s mannerisms right. Also, Fleming was involved in the Connery Bond films and made sure the portrayal of Bond was true. Even in interviews, Connery talked about his sense of humor is very much like Fleming’s sense of humor and that the world of spies has a humor to it which is a big point. Even though spying and killing etc. is serious, there needs to be an element of fun, excitement, humor. Bond isn’t supposed to be serious, there’s a sense of humor and flair to his method of combat. He’s very task-oriented and fixated on the goal (demo Te) but very flexible with how to achieve the goals (Se base). Bond isn’t supposed to be some serious, dry-humored statue like how the other actors (Deltas) portrayed him. Brosnon is the worst Bond and made him LSE.
Last edited by Lolita; 10-10-2020 at 05:06 AM.
Ian Flamming - ESFP Napoleon
This is the comment you are looking for
LSI?
IEE I think.
He's had a lifelong love of acting, right from when he was a small child.
I could believe someone like Christian Bale being LSI, although I suspect in the Big Five he scores above average in terms of Openness to Experience: someone who doesn't seem to have naturally chosen to become an actor.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
