[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRRDzFROMx0[/ame]
The ingenuity of SLI
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRRDzFROMx0[/ame]
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
That's awesome.Originally Posted by tereg
That's hot.
"Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities..."
- Voltaire
Wow, that's impressive.
I've seen that long time ago... great example of Delta&
. (and super Id
)
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
I saw that a while ago too and found it quite amazing.
Wow what a crazy hobby. It really is ingenious though.
It's all done with mirrors.
Isn't that on Rick's site? I think Rick mentioned in his analysis that he could be ESTj also
Really? Hmm.
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
http://socionist.blogspot.com/2007/0...-anything.html
ἀταραξία
Wow, I feel rather .... what's the word...
Being the guy that is one-step off of keeping up to date with things and proclaiming "HEY LOOK AT THIS".
It's kind of embarrassing actually.
Edit: fwiw, I completely did not see this article on Rick's blog before making this thread.
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
At least you didn't type him as a ILE.
Wow, I feel rather .... what's the word...
Being the guy that is one-step off of keeping up to date with things and proclaiming "HEY LOOK AT THIS".
It's kind of embarrassing actually.
Edit: fwiw, I completely did not see this article on Rick's blog before making this thread.
ἀταραξία
The use of that technique 3500 years ago remains unestablished. They could have done it that way, but no evidence exists they did it that way.
It is unfortunate that Wally has not published anything, or sought out historical/in situ evidence to support his claim.
LII
that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.
I don't know if it is the same video, but I think it will be the same chap, unless he's got a mate into it now as well.
It is the same guy.
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
I emailed it to my husband and he critiqued it. He said that the guy's little stone method of moving would only work if he were on a hard surface, like concrete, and the big stones seem to have been moved across ground at stonehenge, so the little stones would have just sunk into the dirt.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
I think this is actually what the video is asserting, that it is a possible way that Stonehenge could have been built. I don't really think that this guy is saying "I have found the way that Stonehenge was built!" but rather a possible way that it might have been built.
I think this "round road" idea is pretty nifty though to get heavy objects going regardless of the surface type. If you look through the website that he built some years ago about the project, he demos more of these "round roads", like this: http://www.theforgottentechnology.com/roundroad.mpg
http://www.theforgottentechnology.com is a pretty interesting site, though a bit outdated.
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
That's interesting, never would have thought of that...
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Guess were back at 'the aliens-did-it' theory then
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
I thought that the Galactic Federation of Light built stonehenge as a gift to all humans demonstrating their inmense love for us
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
