Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 53

Thread: Struggling to find your type?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    852
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Struggling to find your type?

    sorry folks this decision tree for type finding is your only hope for ever finding your type.


    http://intuitivecentral.com/forum/showthread.php?t=961





    At least as good as RMCNew's test

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    However amusing the chart may be, it still does not equate to socionics theory.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    852
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rmcnew
    However amusing the chart may be, it still does not equate to socionics theory.
    lighten up, it's only for fun and your test is great.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Actually, I thought that it was pretty funny (and on a serious note, promising) ... However, what I ment is that you can not really get a socionics type from it, just MBTI. It may just need to be reworded a little to work with socionics.

  5. #5

    Default

    My type isn't even on there you fiend!

  6. #6
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sycophant
    My type isn't even on there you fiend!
    look again dearest
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  7. #7

    Default

    I happen to be a female.

  8. #8
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    loser
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  9. #9

    Default

    Umm.... Insults..... Ah...

    Imp.

  10. #10
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,330
    Mentioned
    209 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sycophant
    I happen to be a female.
    Ya might wanna check again, according to this test..which of course is "your only hope for ever finding your type"... it clearly implies that either you are not a female, or you are not a T.

    Gotta pick one...

    *goes into most dramatic game show impersonation*

    and which one will... YOU choose??????
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  11. #11

    Default

    None of them aply.

  12. #12
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,330
    Mentioned
    209 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sycophant
    None of them apply.
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  13. #13
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    wonder why...
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    852
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It is because she is is probably a cross type and a hermaphrodite

  15. #15
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    that's not what I had in mind
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  16. #16
    Creepy-aurora_faerie

    Default

    how come there are only T types in the model?

  17. #17
    Creepy-Wagner

    Default

    Because all males are T's.

    (scroll down)

  18. #18
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah, and all women are F's.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  19. #19
    Creepy-

    Default

    Ahahaha that's hilarious. w00t. People, we have a page of negative stereotypes. I'll bookmark it for future reference.

  20. #20
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Damn I always suspected I'm dumb. Now I know it. It must be true. It is made by an ENTj

  21. #21

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,074
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    *counts down days until guest access is gone*

    *one more left*

    *yay*
    MAYBE I'LL BREAK DOWN!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by vague
    Rocky's posts are as enjoyable as having wisdom teeth removed.

  22. #22
    Kristiina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Estonia, Tartu
    Posts
    4,021
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What's really funny, is the weird assumption that all guys are T, all girls are F.

    Random quotes from that place:
    There is currently NO evidence to support the idea that any men are F's and any women are T's.
    Just accept your fate, all men are T's.
    Heh - so accurate.

    But where are the INTJ women who love alcohol, I want to know?!
    there are no NT women. silly NF.
    EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
    E3 (probably 3w4)

    Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!

    Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
    New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/

  23. #23
    schrödinger's cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    1,186
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocky
    *counts down days until guest access is gone*

    *one more left*

    *yay*

  24. #24
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    no one actually thinks that all men are thinkers and all women are feelers, ESPECIALLY not me
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  25. #25
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    no one actually thinks that all men are thinkers and all women are feelers, ESPECIALLY not me
    I know. I often get the feeling women are really cold and men are warm and caring For some reason the opposite thinking is mainstream.

  26. #26

    Default

    Oh no I have a penis! Where was that thing all these years?

    No NT women.

  27. #27
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Syc, in my opinion you are warm and caring and thus very special

  28. #28

    Default

    Wow, what is up with all your Fe of late?

    Ahem, at least now I know that people don't only like me because I am a girl.

  29. #29
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hahaha. My (in)famous "gut feeling" told me I crossed the line there.

    My F has been really active lately yes...for many reasons. I try to control it...I spread it so much it starts to look artificial and feel intrusive. I'm just quite emotional atm.

    But I'm also sort of trying to make a point that I don't see INTps really cold as maybe some other types do. And they are often pictured cold in their descriptions too. I admit they can get on my nerves sometimes though, haha.

    But anyways I guess I have to concentrate on promoting ISTps for a while But I have to admit I like INTps very much. Yes Cone you too

    Ok I shut up for now

  30. #30
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East Coast West Coast Dirty South
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,826
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    .
    Pre-2013 post are written with incomplete understanding.

  31. #31
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East Coast West Coast Dirty South
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,826
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    arrogant, stubborn, ordered.
    Pretty close, I'll give them that.
    Pre-2013 post are written with incomplete understanding.

  32. #32
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East Coast West Coast Dirty South
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,826
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XoX
    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    no one actually thinks that all men are thinkers and all women are feelers, ESPECIALLY not me
    I know. I often get the feeling women are really cold and men are warm and caring For some reason the opposite thinking is mainstream.

    How dare you imply I'm mainstream.


    Yeah, I've seen women be cold, though. I'mnot going to argue against that.
    There all sorts of topics that can sprout from this... and they've been in and around the forums, too - feminization of males, masculinty prototypes, etc etc etc
    Pre-2013 post are written with incomplete understanding.

  33. #33
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UDP
    How dare you imply I'm mainstream.
    Heh. I'm sorry if you feel that way. And I think you should really drop that knife and use a flower instead. And I'm not only talking about your avatar

  34. #34
    Creepy-

    Default

    Maybe the assumption that men are T and women are F is a hetereosexist construct meant to tell us that our "dual" (read "complimenting partner" to not restrict it to Socionics) can only be someone of the opposite sex.

  35. #35
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East Coast West Coast Dirty South
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,826
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XoX
    Quote Originally Posted by UDP
    How dare you imply I'm mainstream.
    Heh. I'm sorry if you feel that way. And I think you should really drop that knife and use a flower instead. And I'm not only talking about your avatar
    What is that supposed to mean?
    Pre-2013 post are written with incomplete understanding.

  36. #36
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XoX
    Quote Originally Posted by UDP
    How dare you imply I'm mainstream.
    Heh. I'm sorry if you feel that way. And I think you should really drop that knife and use a flower instead. And I'm not only talking about your avatar
    um. are you SURE you're ISTp???
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  37. #37
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ishysquishy
    Maybe the assumption that men are T and women are F is a hetereosexist construct meant to tell us that our "dual" (read "complimenting partner" to not restrict it to Socionics) can only be someone of the opposite sex.
    There is nothing complementary about two female genitalia. And discojoe already explained in a poetic way the complementary nature of strong male arms and delicate women bodies. This leads me to believe that also psychologically the only way to find truly complementary relationship is between people of opposite genders. Idea of same sex complementary relationships also conflict with the ISTp yin-yang philosophy of the universe. But then again I don't want to be the official fun spoiler so please have it your way

  38. #38
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UDP
    Quote Originally Posted by XoX
    Quote Originally Posted by UDP
    How dare you imply I'm mainstream.
    Heh. I'm sorry if you feel that way. And I think you should really drop that knife and use a flower instead. And I'm not only talking about your avatar
    What is that supposed to mean?
    It means I'm reading minor hostility in your comments But I might wrong Anyways flower power beats knife power in my books :wink: So, what type are you? People say INTj but people are often wrong.

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    um. are you SURE you're ISTp???
    You have made a hobby of questioning people's types... Well, I found out I'm supposed to be a "caring" type so I'm trying to fulfill my destiny. Or maybe I'm just converting to ISFp :wink: Too much reading and emotional stress has probably just messed my head. F is flowing without my conscious effort. I might be back at throwing insults and shooting people again next week so don't worry.

  39. #39
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I was teasing you.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  40. #40
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East Coast West Coast Dirty South
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,826
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XoX
    And discojoe already explained in a poetic way the complementary nature of strong male arms and delicate women bodies. This leads me to believe that also psychologically the only way to find truly complementary relationship is between people of opposite genders. Idea of same sex complementary relationships also conflict with the ISTp yin-yang philosophy of the universe.
    I can agree with you on that; those are similar to my own views.
    Pre-2013 post are written with incomplete understanding.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •