Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 44

Thread: what are the dual types that are the least likely to want children?

  1. #1
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,321
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default what are the dual types that are the least likely to want children?

    in your opinion? Or are there any?
    IEI-Fe 4w3

  2. #2
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  3. #3
    strrrng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    Ni-IEI 4w3 sx/so
    Posts
    8,781
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    lol @ this thread
    4w3-5w6-8w7

  4. #4
    Khamelion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    U.S.
    TIM
    SEE-Fi 6w7 sx/so
    Posts
    3,828
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    don't think it has much to do with type or let alone pairing types.

    i would think personal goals and physical limitations are more relevant. as well as how one or the other was raised....and their own ideas about children that are unrelated to socionics on too many levels to make this kind of conclusion.

    maybe their reasoning behind not wanting to or wanting to might point towards certain functions, but other than that...
    SEE Unknown Subtype
    6w7 sx/so



    [21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
    [21:29] hitta: and not dying
    .

  5. #5
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,321
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ephemeros View Post
    IEI + SLE imo. i already know one such old couple (him=IEI, her=SLE) without children but not this made my mind.
    fwiw, my IEI/SLE brother/SIL don't have any kids and I'm not sure they intend to.
    IEI-Fe 4w3

  6. #6
    Éminence grise mikemex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Third Planet
    TIM
    IEE-Ne
    Posts
    1,631
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Se quadras < Si quadras
    [] | NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)

    You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life.
    - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.

  7. #7
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think it depends on the couple.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  8. #8
    unefille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    841
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    I think it depends on the couple.
    Stop being NOW!
    ()
    3w4-1w2-5w4 sx/sp

  9. #9
    Haikus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    MI
    TIM
    IEI-Ni
    Posts
    10,060
    Mentioned
    223 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Se quadras < Si quadras
    You're usually smart Mikemex, but you just pulled that one out of your ass.

    This is not socionics related. Maybe you could argue that accidental pregnancy is for valuers more though. It's usually the Betas that run the sexual education courses.
    Last edited by bnd; 10-10-2008 at 12:45 AM.

  10. #10
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  11. #11
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ephemeros View Post
    IEI + SLE imo.
    That was the first thought that came to my mind, but I think it's all about the individuals involved, really.

    I know an SEE who does not want kids. Or more specifically, she does not want babies. I've wondered if it has something to do with having Si as an ignoring function.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  12. #12
    JRiddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Indian Territory
    TIM
    Ne-ENTp 7w8 sx/so
    Posts
    838
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy View Post
    That was the first thought that came to my mind, but I think it's all about the individuals involved, really.

    I know an SEE who does not want kids. Or more specifically, she does not want babies. I've wondered if it has something to do with having Si as an ignoring function.
    Yeah, there's probably an easy way to make sense of something like this.

    JRiddy
    —————King of Socionics—————

    Ne-ENTp 7w8 sx/so

  13. #13
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  14. #14
    Éminence grise mikemex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Third Planet
    TIM
    IEE-Ne
    Posts
    1,631
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BulletsAndDoves View Post
    You're usually smart Mikemex, but you just pulled that one out of your ass.
    Maybe. I never claim that my opinion is the ultimate truth. But I've got that impression because, on average, Se quadra couples tend to have less children. At least the ones I know and I know many.
    [] | NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)

    You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life.
    - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.

  15. #15
    Kristiina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Estonia, Tartu
    Posts
    4,021
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Perhaps most duals are equal, but kids are a less likely event when the woman is a thinker, especially when she's making a career.

    Si/Ne valuing types have a kid because it's nice to raise someone.
    Se/Ni valuing types have kids to have progeny.
    EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
    E3 (probably 3w4)

    Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!

    Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
    New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/

  16. #16
    JRiddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Indian Territory
    TIM
    Ne-ENTp 7w8 sx/so
    Posts
    838
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kristiina View Post
    Perhaps most duals are equal, but kids are a less likely event when the woman is a thinker, especially when she's making a career.

    Si/Ne valuing types have a kid because it's nice to raise someone.
    Se/Ni valuing types have kids to have progeny.
    I think it has far more to do with culture and socialization than type. Oh yeah, and logical type women are of course the ones who want to have a career ... :/

    Seattle and San Fransisco both have very low populations of children. This is because the dumbasses who live in those places think kids will "cramp their style." I hate them.

    JRiddy
    —————King of Socionics—————

    Ne-ENTp 7w8 sx/so

  17. #17
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,860
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    by: Viktor Talanov

    3. The desire to have three or more children

    Managed to get an answer to this question of 172 people with diagnosed type (Fig. 3). Among sotsionicheskih signs, judging by the results of the most beneficial effect on chadolyubie have intuition and positivism. Another noticeable effect sotsionicheskih functions: clearly stimulated, and so much inhibits the desire to have many children. Clearly expressed, and the dependence of the clubs: Scientist wants to have many descendants, and the practice is not - it can be assumed that they see in them dokuku and extra mouths. Humanists and social occupy middle position and vary little (at the desire of humanists in a significant number of children did a little bit more). From Blocks depending not.

    Frankly speaking, the result is encouraging. Egoist does not want to have many children. In the old days, the negative side is compensated for the reproduction of a higher propensity to take up sex in the absence of reliable contraception in public funds. Now, contraceptives, the glory of God, good. If you believe that human desires and the reality at least somewhat correlated to life, the «Scientist» in our civilized times, is all, more opportunities to keep the peace offspring than the «experts». Why the author does not hide this fact of joy? It is not because he himself Scientist. The matter is otherwise. Just this world of Scientist is not seen evil, but because of selfish practitioners (to which belong, for example, almost all government bureaucrats and officers of secret services) - as long as you want. In the past one hundred years of this evil in all countries - with the obvious bust. Sensory manifestations around too obvious surplus. Sensor, as the social, as well as practitioners, we must not only violence but also the widespread reign of inefficient consumption patterns of society, which is thoughtlessly devour and blow the earth's resources entirely without benefit to the future of its day.

    Therefore, the increased propensity Scientist to spread their genes are pleased (well, except for the ILI - a god with him). For full of joy not only lacking confidence that the club membership at least as a heritage ... It is not investigated this matter plainly, is not investigated, alas.

    But still encouraging. So, not yet extinct, it means that more will live.




    Fig. 3. The desire to have three or more children. The largest chadolyubie as seen showing LII (sub-sample of 15 persons), LIE (5) and EII (11). The least desire to have many children (and hence the tendency to a gradual run-off of its genes from the population) show SEI (8) and LSE (true for LSE results unreliable - its sub-sample was composed of only 3 people).


    Source: http://www.newsocionicsmodel.narod.ru/Five_items.html

  18. #18
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,321
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    that's funny. I know an SEI and EII couple, they both come from large families. She wanted lots of kids and he wanted only two. They ended up with two.
    IEI-Fe 4w3

  19. #19
    Ritella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    at your feet
    Posts
    2,092
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    weird thread. i want children, but then i think about all the work and it just seems...exhausting.
    i think 2 is a good number, and only if I were married to an LSE.
    EII; E6(w5)

    i am flakey

  20. #20
    Ritella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    at your feet
    Posts
    2,092
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kristiina View Post
    Si/Ne valuing types have a kid because it's nice to raise someone.
    Se/Ni valuing types have kids to have progeny.
    yes, i agree with this. i might slightly change Si/Ne to "it's interesting helping someone flesh out their potential."
    EII; E6(w5)

    i am flakey

  21. #21
    jessica129's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,122
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Who knows the psychology behind this. All I know is I want kids so bad. Sadly this will probobly get put off til i'm in my thirties. I couldn't see myself having more than two. I'd like to space them a few years apart to give them the attention they need and what not. More than two and i'd feel like there would be too much competition/me not giving them enough attention. I go thru my baby phases...this is definetly one of those times.

  22. #22
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Woot!

    Deltas are dying off!

    EDIT

    Living proof.

    The only reason I'm alive is because my dad's a Gamma.

  23. #23
    forgetmenot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    175
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I would love to have children and I could have them let's say in two years time but I don't think it would be possible due to the lack of the partner
    I know ESTp who would like to have many children (25)

  24. #24
    ILE - ENTp 1981slater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spain
    TIM
    ILE (ENTp)
    Posts
    4,866
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default x

    Perhaps we are asking the wrong question, since most people end up having kids. IMO, the right question would be "which types are willing to have children before age 25,30,35,etc?" My opinion about this: socionics rationals want to set up in life as quickly as possible (read: "I want a mortgage, being married and 2 kids before 25") whereas irrationals prefer freedom ("I am not getting married until I'm 40").

    Sensors develop their bodies very quickly and they are "adults" at age 18-20, and start to age in their 40s. On the other hand, intuitives look younger than they really are and don't reach their peak until they are 30 or so, thus, they start to age in their 60s.

    Nevertheless, so many traits are related to this issue that it's difficult to find a correlation between Socionics and it.
    ILE "Searcher"
    Socionics: ENTp
    DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
    Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
    MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
    Astrological sign: Aquarius

    To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.

  25. #25
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 1981slater View Post
    Sensors develop their bodies very quickly and they are "adults" at age 18-20, and start to age in their 40s. On the other hand, intuitives look younger than they really are and don't reach their peak until they are 30 or so, thus, they start to age in their 60s.
    Absolutely. This is an excellent analysis.

    Would you say that Intuiters are more prone to dementia?

  26. #26
    ILE - ENTp 1981slater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spain
    TIM
    ILE (ENTp)
    Posts
    4,866
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gulanzon View Post
    Would you say that Intuiters are more prone to dementia?
    If dementia means ("thinking too much"), definitely.
    ILE "Searcher"
    Socionics: ENTp
    DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
    Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
    MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
    Astrological sign: Aquarius

    To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.

  27. #27
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Well, if one says that Sensers, being seated in the body, are prone to early degradation of the body, would it not follow logically that Intuiters, being seated in the mind, suffer early degradation of the mind?

  28. #28

    Default

    Like anyone would want to have babies with ILIs
    ...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.

    INTp

  29. #29
    forgetmenot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    175
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gulanzon View Post
    Well, if one says that Sensers, being seated in the body, are prone to early degradation of the body, would it not follow logically that Intuiters, being seated in the mind, suffer early degradation of the mind?

  30. #30
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    POOPLAIR
    TIM
    Alpha NT 5w4 so/sx
    Posts
    4,399
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think this has absolutely nothing to do with type.
    OPERATION POOPLAIR

    Now conscripting, for more information come here: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...48#post1003048

  31. #31
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,321
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warlord View Post
    Like anyone would want to have babies with ILIs
    lol! I have an ILI friend who's married to his dual. They have four, two biological and two adopted.
    IEI-Fe 4w3

  32. #32
    ILE - ENTp 1981slater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Spain
    TIM
    ILE (ENTp)
    Posts
    4,866
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gulanzon View Post
    Well, if one says that Sensers, being seated in the body, are prone to early degradation of the body, would it not follow logically that Intuiters, being seated in the mind, suffer early degradation of the mind?
    makes sense, but idk what to say

    On dementia: intuitives daydream too much, whereas sensors are more pragmatic and find easy ways of being happy.

    On degradation: if most sensors start to age at 40, I wouldn't call it degradation. If one sensor start to age at 35, I'd call it degradation. We don't have to compare sensors' aging speed with intuitives' aging speed.
    ILE "Searcher"
    Socionics: ENTp
    DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
    Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
    MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
    Astrological sign: Aquarius

    To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.

  33. #33
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    POOPLAIR
    TIM
    Alpha NT 5w4 so/sx
    Posts
    4,399
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gulanzon View Post
    Well, if one says that Sensers, being seated in the body, are prone to early degradation of the body, would it not follow logically that Intuiters, being seated in the mind, suffer early degradation of the mind?

    Dude that is just wrong.

    Sensors seated in the body????

    wtf


    That is MBTI BS plain and simple
    OPERATION POOPLAIR

    Now conscripting, for more information come here: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...48#post1003048

  34. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gulanzon View Post
    Well, if one says that Sensers, being seated in the body, are prone to early degradation of the body, would it not follow logically that Intuiters, being seated in the mind, suffer early degradation of the mind?
    Body decays from use because of oxidation. Mind improves from use because of growth of neurons.
    ...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.

    INTp

  35. #35
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,321
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    kids are great--they're funny and cute, interesting and intelligent.

    they're also LOUD (especially when you have three of them) and they'll eat you out of house and home before they're 10.

    I couldn't imagine life without them.
    IEI-Fe 4w3

  36. #36
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  37. #37
    Currently God Brilliand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nevada
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    4,246
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warlord View Post
    Body decays from use because of oxidation. Mind improves from use because of growth of neurons.
    Actually, they both do both. The body grows stronger with use, and wears out. The mind grows stronger with use, but it also has more difficulty learning later in life, because of the crowd of other knowledge it must be related to and verified against.

    Following the same assumptions you're following here (that ArchonAlarion rejected), Sensors would have strong, old bodies and weak, young minds, whereas Intuiters would have strong, old minds and weak, young bodies.



    LII-Ne

    "Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
    - Blair Houghton

    Johari

  38. #38
    Creepy-Pied Piper

    Default

    Removed at User Request

  39. #39
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ArchonAlarion View Post
    Dude that is just wrong.

    Sensors seated in the body????

    wtf


    That is MBTI BS plain and simple
    Looks like someone had a humor malfunction

    Definitely not Ne-leading.

  40. #40
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    POOPLAIR
    TIM
    Alpha NT 5w4 so/sx
    Posts
    4,399
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gulanzon View Post
    Looks like someone had a humor malfunction

    Definitely not Ne-leading.

    Lol technically I'm not. Ti ENTp means Ti is my mode function (leading)

    Also, people do post things like that with serious intentions. So sorry for not catching that, but its an easy mistake.
    OPERATION POOPLAIR

    Now conscripting, for more information come here: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...48#post1003048

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •