What are the problems with this website? From what I understand, one of the main complaints is an overemphasis on V.I., in both the descriptions and as a general philosophy. Not only is there talk about an overemphasis on V.I., but I've heard that their views on it are inaccurate. I would agree with this complaint. When reading the site, I usually ignore the talk of V.I. altogether. However, the question is, do you consider the other information on the website to be flawed, such as the non-V.I. aspects of the type descriptions?