-

[Dee]

-

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[tereg]

Answers:
3 3 8 6
5 2 5 6
7 5 7 6
6 3 4 6
5 8 2 4



pfff

[Expat]

I tried to answer without second-guessing the test.

Results:

highest: IEE (40), ILI (23), LIE (20)
lowest: IEI (-40), ILE (-22), LII (-20)

[Gilly]

All 4 Merry Extroverts were tied for me.

[implied]

ILE, EII, LIE.

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[tereg]

[jessica129]

ESI 22
SEI 16
SLI 14
EIE 10

My top four. ummm.....

[munenori2]

SEI 24
ILE 22
EII 8
LSE 6
EIE 2
LII 0
LSI 0
ESE -2
SLE -2
LIE -2
IEI -4
SEE -6
SLI -8
IEE -10
ESI -20
ILI -24

[Not A Communist Shill]

ILE 20
SEI 5
EII 3
LSE 1
SLE -1
IEI -3
ILI -3
LSI -5
LIE -7
SEE -9
ESI -9
LII -9
ESE -11
EIE -11
IEE -13
SLI -19

[aestrivex]

ILE 12
SEI 6
ESE -4
LII 6
SLE 8
IEI -2
LSI -6
EIE -4
SEE -12
ILI 2
ESI 6
LIE 0
IEE 12
SLI -10
LSE 4
EII -10

use a font such that (font used != comic sans) or else i won't take the next test.

[Mea]

SLE 12
EIE 8
ILI 8
EII 8
ILE 4
SEI 4
ESE 0
LSE 0
ESI -4
LII -8
LSI -8
SEE -8
LIE -12
IEE -12
SLI -12
IEI -12

main problem i had with the test was that i could relate and not relate to some parts of the same question.

[Wynch]

I was:

ILE 21
ESE 21
LSE 19
LII 11

My only comment is that there's a sentence in the Process dichotomy that drastically changing my score from heavily leaning ILE(27)/LSE(23) to balanced ILE(21)/ESE(21). That sentence is the one about finishing something until the end before moving on to something else. I believe that can be a little misleading, especially for ILEs. Correct me if I'm over-stepping myself, fellow ILEs, but I don't like finishing things to the end. I like finishing them until the end is in sight, until I can see where the project will progress in order for it to reach completion. At that point I shed the project entirely and move on to the next one, or I have to painfully force myself to reach it's conclusion. This, I would argue, is because I'm more concerned with the process of doing the thing, than actually obtaining an end result. I prefer to explore the development rather than invest in an outcome. In the sense of mental outcomes, I like to reach a certain sense of finality, a loose conclusion from which I feel I have gained sufficient knowledge, but nothing terribly concrete. To me, this seems to make perfect sense for the rest of the Process dichotomy (which I relate with), it's this single sentence that often throws me, because I think it loses the essence of the dichotomy.

[Expat]

lol. i wonder how accurate is that. obviously not you'd say, right?

Why are you asking? If I say I type myself as LIE, obviously I would say that a test that gives me the highest scores - by far - as IEE is not accurate. There is no mystery to this.

[jason_m]

ILE 5
SEI -17
ESE 1
LII -9
SLE -5
IEI -7
LSI -11
EIE 3
SEE 15
ILI -19
ESI -3
LIE 19
IEE 5
SLI 15
LSE -3
EII -5

Jason

[Nexus]

LSI 42
ILI 18
ILE 6
EIE 6
ESE 6
SEI -6
IEI -6
EII -6
ESI -6
SLI -6
SLE -18
SEE -18
IEE -18
LIE -18
LII -30
LSE -42

That seems right, b/c my next guess after LSI would be ILI. I am pretty confident that I am not / valuing.

[Nexus]

Take 2:

ISTj 100%
Other 0%

same answers as before: nnnyyyynynynnynyyynn

[Wynch]

Ah, now I am 100% ILE as well

My answers:

7483
8222
2838
8477
8822

[Simon Ssmall]

LIE - 1569
IEE - 1457

2562
3547
3683
6324
4286

I consider myself as IEE, I can't see myself as LIE. The fact those two types are side by side makes me confused

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[tereg]

I'm assuming the questions weren't reordered, because I just plugged in the same answers as before.

I still consider myself to be ENFp

[Simon Ssmall]

Expat is LIE
I'm IEE

we come out vice versa, something overlaps or whatnot.


One way or another me being a j is something hardly possible and id say impossible.

Me being a T is something also...erm not very likely.

Not to mention Gamma is something alien to me (but that's probably a bit less important).

Smile on my pic, dunno, there are more photos of me here:
picasaweb.google.com/simonas.garliauskas

If I'm not IEE I'm most likely IEI or SEI, but neither of those two I consider much. LIE was never on my list and I don't see why it should be.

P.S. I come out as ENFP in MB also.

[Simon Ssmall]

my dad is identical to the guy on your photo. actually, since not so long ago i have been quite seriously entertaining gamma NT for him alongside mostly SLI and SLE.

Do I have some universal Dad look or something, first Mimosa, now you. I was cloned!

[Simon Ssmall]

dee, ssmall is IEE, not LIE.

Just curious if your basing it on something or you just go by what I consider to be my correct type? If you base it on something would be nice if you could send those reasons via PM, thanks , if you can be bothered that is.

[athenian200]

Answers:

1. 4

2. 8

3. 6

4. 7

5. 5

6. 3

7. 2

8. 5

9. 4

10. 6

11. 4

12. 8

13. 7

14. 3

15. 7

16. 2

17. 6

18. 7

19. 2

20. 4

Test results:

1195: LII

507: ILE

-18: SLE, EII

-753: ESE

-824: EIE, SLI

-938: SEI

-1055: SEE

-1068: IEI, LSE

-1179: LIE

-1190: ESI

-1193: LSI, ILI, IEE

Assumed type:

Unknown. Introversion and/or Intuition preference is likely.

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[Expat]

i just wondered what your thoughts are on this outcome. maybe you'd suddenly realise you are IEE and share your feelings w/ us (j/k, though it was (is?) a possibility).

What do you expect me to say? My thoughts are that your test sucks. A good test based on Reinin dichotomies would be useful to check their applicability, but I don't think your test is good even for that.

[Ezra]

What do you expect me to say? My thoughts are that your test sucks. A good test based on Reinin dichotomies would be useful to check their applicability, but I don't think your test is good even for that.

lol @ expat saying something i would say except that i didn't

lol @ se base expat