People on the forum and socionics opinions

[Ezra]

EZRAAAAA: DOES THE JOBS YOU HATE, SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO DO THEM!

Please note: this is entirely impartial of me. How I rate your socionics opinions bears no relation to how much I like you as a person.

People who are (or at least seem to be), generally, on the right track
-Baby
-BurntOrange
-cracka
-Diana
-Elro
-Expat
-Gilly
-glamourama
-idolatrie
-implied
-Kristiina
-liveandletlive
-Logos
-Loki
-Mimosa Pudica
-Minde
-misutii
-mn0good
-munenori2
-niffweed17
-normal
-PotatoSpirit
-reyn_til_runa
-ScarlettLux*
-Slacker Mom
-Subterranean
-Suomea
-tereg
-unefille

People who appear to need their views readjusting slightly
-Allie*
-Carla**
-Cyclops*
-discojoe**
-esper**
-FDG*
-Huitzilopochtli
-Jem
-Joy**
-jxrtes**
-Ms. Kensington**
-thehotelambush*
-snegledmaca
-Steve*
-UDP*

People who you just need to sit down face-to-face with to drill into their thick fucking head the correct way to approach socionics
-Blaze**
-dbmmama
-dee*
-eunice*
-heath
-jessica129
-JuJu
-LokiVanguard
-machintruc*
-Most new members
-strrrng*
-tbone018937520346124
-Winterpark

Absolute lost causes
-crazedrat
-hitta
-Phaedrus
-tcaudilllg

People who either couldn't care less about socionics or don't seem to have any clear socionics opinions
-1981slater
-aka-kitsune
-bee
-Bionicgoat
-BLauritson
-Darkstar
-Mariano Rajoy
-mercutio
-Ryene Astraelis
-Starfall

*Implies that this individual may actually be a level down from what they are
**Implies that this individual may actually be a level up from what they are

[Park]

Ok, good, now go fuck yourself. Because I'd hate to do it.

[xyz]

ahem, the "correct" way being the "Ezra" way.

[Cuddly McFluffles]

Wow. I was mentioned. *feels honored*

*feels even more honored that she's not on the bad list*

[machintruc]

People who you just need to sit down face-to-face with to drill into their thick fucking head the correct way to approach socionics
-machintruc*

You're such a fuckin' fucked idiot. ******s are cooler than you. Fuck you.

[Gilly]

You're such a fuckin' fucked idiot. ******s are cooler than you. Fuck you.

I bet that feels good even though you're trying to be offhand and nonserious about it.

[Gilly]

Well-done, by the way. I agree with everything with the exception of strrrng; I believe he belongs in the category above, perhaps with one star.

[aestrivex]

people who consistently get many things right, from my perspective (as you'll see, this is a very biased list)
diana (possibly well developed)
electric
expat (possibly well developed)
implied
isha
mea
rick

people with very well developed views who don't belong in the first category for one reason or another (ie some amount of error is accepted given that generally these people have a good grasp of the subject)
baby (possibly moderately developed)
ezra
gilly
glamourama (possibly moderately developed)
herzy (possibly moderately developed)
kim
logos
loki
minde
mn0good (possibly consistently right; she's actually right most all of the time, but she spouts a lot of unintelligible gibberish too)
mysticsonic
slacker mom (possibly moderately developed)
starfall (possibly moderately developed)
tereg (possibly moderately developed)
vague

moderately well developed views, possibly with some problems
anndelise (possibly well developed)
baby (possibly well developed)
blauritson
carla (possibly well developed)
elro
esper (possibly well developed; hasn't devoted enough time to the subject matter, as far as i can tell. i think esper is very intelligent and probably respect her judgment more than many, but her socionics views seem quite shallow; if she's making a number of good judgments she's also making poor ones -- maybe similar to my enneagram views in comparison to hers.)
heath
hostage child (possibly well developed)
ifmd95
jonathan
joy
kamangir
khamelion
kristiina (possibly tenuous)
misutii
ms kensington (possibly tenuous)
munenori (possibly doesn't care)
reyn til runa
scarlettlux
snegledmaca
suomea (possibly well developed)
thehotelambush (possibly well developed; he has a lot of "well developed" ideas but some of them make perfect sense and a few of them are absurd)
unefille
XoX

tenuous views, possibly eccentric, poorly thought out, or not well developed
bee
blaze
christyb
coolguy89
dbmmama
discojoe
dolphin
hellothere (possibly moderately developed)
jessica129 (possibly hopeless/jxrtes)
jimbean
juju (possibly hopeless/jxrtes)
kioshi
lokivanguard
mpiazza000
olga
oyburger
ritella
rocky
smilingeyes
UDP (possibly moderately developed)
winterpark

hopeless cases who listen (ie jxrtes archetype)
allie
ashton
dee (possibly hopeless/phaedrus)
drd252
eunice
hkkmr
hoodrat
jriddy
jxrtes
rmcnew
smccosker
steve

hopeless cases who do not listen (ie phaedrus archetype)
bulletsanddoves
consentingadult
crazedrat
cyclops
dioklecian
FDG
hitta
hugo
jadae
jarno
machintruc
mikemex
phaedrus
tcaudilllg

don't seem to care
bionicgoat
cpig
cracka
garmonbozia
pitbull
subterranean
themime

special case
strrrng


i have omitted myself. one other name has been inconspicuously omitted that should be included on the basis of socionics views alone.

[Logos]

(as you'll see, this is a very biased list)

At least you can admit it while providing a well-supported argument.

[discojoe]

What I'm impressed by is that you guys are able to mentally keep track of all those people.

[Hitta]

EZRAAAAA: DOES THE JOBS YOU HATE, SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO DO THEM!

Please note: this is entirely impartial of me. How I rate your socionics opinions bears no relation to how much I like you as a person.

People who are (or at least seem to be), generally, on the right track
-Baby
-BurntOrange
-cracka
-Diana
-Elro
-Expat
-Gilly
-glamourama
-idolatrie
-implied
-Kristiina
-liveandletlive
-Logos
-Loki
-Mimosa Pudica
-Minde
-misutii
-mn0good
-munenori2
-niffweed17
-normal
-PotatoSpirit
-reyn_til_runa
-ScarlettLux*
-Slacker Mom
-Subterranean
-Suomea
-tereg
-unefille

People who appear to need their views readjusting slightly
-Allie*
-Carla**
-Cyclops*
-discojoe**
-esper**
-FDG*
-Huitzilopochtli
-Jem
-Joy**
-jxrtes**
-Ms. Kensington**
-thehotelambush*
-snegledmaca
-Steve*
-UDP*

People who you just need to sit down face-to-face with to drill into their thick fucking head the correct way to approach socionics
-Blaze**
-dbmmama
-dee*
-eunice*
-heath
-jessica129
-JuJu
-LokiVanguard
-machintruc*
-Most new members
-strrrng*
-tbone018937520346124
-Winterpark

Absolute lost causes
-crazedrat
-hitta
-Phaedrus
-tcaudilllg

People who either couldn't care less about socionics or don't seem to have any clear socionics opinions
-1981slater
-aka-kitsune
-bee
-Bionicgoat
-BLauritson
-Darkstar
-Mariano Rajoy
-mercutio
-Ryene Astraelis
-Starfall

*Implies that this individual may actually be a level down from what they are
**Implies that this individual may actually be a level up from what they are

Stereotyping people based on your own expectations of a system that may or may not exist is retarded. People change the "rules" of socionics to fit their own expectations of how a person is compared to themselves and what traits they think they are. Everyone has their own system, everyone is a lost cause, because people aren't smart enough to see outside of the box and see outside of their mistakes. Socionics is a theoretical system. Almighty God hasn't came down with the book "The Bible Part 2: Ezra's Truth" and bestowed some more of his amazing objectivity to a completely subjective world. You are no better than Phaedrus(though a bit more communicative). This is your crack, your drug. You like to believe that your knowledge is superior to others. There seriously needs to be a Socionics Rehab program. There are infinite possibilities to the truth. There are things about the human mind that we do not understand(and may never understand). There are things about people in general that we may not ever understand, like whether or not a soul or some hidden force exists behind our rationale. People have a lot more to them than usually meets the eye. There is usually whole networks of logical systems within people that socionics will never ever ever ever ever explain. To fit people into a system and to call it your truth, and criticizing people for changing the rules to a system that you've become attached to is really fucked up. We'll never get anywhere if we don't explore.

[strrrng]

Suck a dick, Ezra.

[strrrng]

Stereotyping people based on your own expectations of a system that may or may not exist is retarded. People change the "rules" of socionics to fit their own expectations of how a person is compared to themselves and what traits they think they are. Everyone has their own system, everyone is a lost cause, because people aren't smart enough to see outside of the box and see outside of their mistakes. Socionics is a theoretical system. Almighty God hasn't came down with the book "The Bible Part 2: Ezra's Truth" and bestowed some more of his amazing objectivity to a completely subjective world. You are no better than Phaedrus(though a bit more communicative). This is your crack, your drug. You like to believe that your knowledge is superior to others. There seriously needs to be a Socionics Rehab program. There are infinite possibilities to the truth. There are things about the human mind that we do not understand(and may never understand). There are things about people in general that we may not ever understand, like whether or not a soul or some hidden force exists behind our rationale. People have a lot more to them than usually meets the eye. There is usually whole networks of logical systems within people that socionics will never ever ever ever ever explain. To fit people into a system and to call it your truth, and criticizing people for changing the rules to a system that you've become attached to is really fucked up. We'll never get anywhere if we don't explore.

+100

[strrrng]

special case
strrrng

Did someone just call nicki special???


(runs away with self-loathing 4 glee)

[Khola aka Bee]

I lolled. Yeah, I have views. Don't really express them nor care how that reflects on my view of socionics as seen by others, although I do use it more than you'd imagine once in a while.

Pretty close really.

Let's get back to the fun stuff!

[Hitta]

I lolled. Yeah, I have views. Don't really express them nor care how that reflects on my view of socionics as seen by others, although I do use it more than you'd imagine once in a while.

Pretty close really.

Let's get back to the fun stuff!

I'd like to invite you and your friends to a vacation in Louisiana.

[Khamelion]

WHY AM I NEVER INCLUDED IN THESE SORTS OF LISTS?!??!?!


IVE BEEN HERE FOR 3 YEARS DAMNIT!

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[Khamelion]

you're on ifmd95's list.

pssshh, ill accept that but STILL


why can't i make ezra's list??!?! fuck that shit man.....ive been here longer than him too.

[Khamelion]

again, NOT ON THE FUCKING LIST

[Hitta]

again, NOT ON THE FUCKING LIST

Socionics Losers:

Phaedrus
Khamelion

[Hitta]

YAY Khame made my list.

[Hitta]

Note that prior statement was a joke. I love Khamey.

[cracka]

"poor socionics" closer to 1:

(sorry if i hurt some feelings, also i may be wrong in many cases)

1 -cracka

I'm #1... SLE ftw!!!

[aestrivex]

you're on ifmd95's list.

she's on my list as well.

[Khamelion]

she's on my list as well.

i didnt see that lols



rofl, im on a list with phaedrus. sick

[FDG]

That's absurd. I'm clearly one of the best typers of the forum. Putting me in the second cathegory shows how much you are far from Truth, my dear son Ezra.

Uhm, how come ScarlettLux is one level down but still in the top set?

[aestrivex]

i didnt see that lols



rofl, im on a list with phaedrus. sick

well... with phaedrus in an entirely different category, yes.

[mikemex]

Poor mortals.

[Creepy-Cyclops]

Bedroom Socionics Practitioner:

Niffweed

[Satan]

Ezra,

It's sad to see that you have so much time on your hands, that you go around making lists of who's opinion you think is relevant.

When states reach a sad affair, I feel that one is getting too involved.

And I've observed over the years, that when people care too much, they stop seeing reality for what it is. They get so hell-bent on their biases, that they lose track of where they're going.

And thus I'd urge you to take a step back, and put things into perspective and ask yourself this. Is this the way I can most benefit mankind.

[JuJu]

Ezra, I agree with Mercutio.

One expects this kind of obsessive crap from Niffweed... (Hopefully, he meets a nice guy or girl, w/e he's into, at Brown, and cuts down on the solipsistic diatribes.)

[1981slater]

This is my list

Captured

1- Saddam
2- Adolf

At large

3- Osama
4 - Magneto

Located

5- Hugo
6 - Mahmud
7 - Kim

[strrrng]

I think niffweed's list is more in line with the current context and less bound by previous opinions.

And lol @ Ezra putting burntorange in the top category -- cause he pwned him in that thread.

[Ezra]

people who consistently get many things right, from my perspective (as you'll see, this is a very biased list)
diana (possibly well developed)
electric
expat (possibly well developed)
implied
isha
mea
rick

people with very well developed views who don't belong in the first category for one reason or another (ie some amount of error is accepted given that generally these people have a good grasp of the subject)
baby (possibly moderately developed)
ezra
gilly
glamourama (possibly moderately developed)
herzy (possibly moderately developed)
kim
logos
loki
minde
mn0good (possibly consistently right; she's actually right most all of the time, but she spouts a lot of unintelligible gibberish too)
mysticsonic
slacker mom (possibly moderately developed)
starfall (possibly moderately developed)
tereg (possibly moderately developed)
vague

moderately well developed views, possibly with some problems
anndelise (possibly well developed)
baby (possibly well developed)
blauritson
carla (possibly well developed)
elro
esper (possibly well developed; hasn't devoted enough time to the subject matter, as far as i can tell. i think esper is very intelligent and probably respect her judgment more than many, but her socionics views seem quite shallow; if she's making a number of good judgments she's also making poor ones -- maybe similar to my enneagram views in comparison to hers.)
heath
hostage child (possibly well developed)
ifmd95
jonathan
joy
kamangir
khamelion
kristiina (possibly tenuous)
misutii
ms kensington (possibly tenuous)
munenori (possibly doesn't care)
reyn til runa
rocky
scarlettlux
snegledmaca
suomea (possibly well developed)
thehotelambush (possibly well developed; he has a lot of "well developed" ideas but some of them make perfect sense and a few of them are absurd)
unefille
XoX

tenuous views, possibly eccentric, poorly thought out, or not well developed
bee
blaze
christyb
coolguy89
dbmmama
discojoe
dolphin
hellothere (possibly moderately developed)
jessica129 (possibly hopeless/jxrtes)
jimbean
juju (possibly hopeless/jxrtes)
kioshi
lokivanguard
mpiazza000
olga
oyburger
ritella
smilingeyes
UDP (possibly moderately developed)
winterpark

hopeless cases who listen (ie jxrtes archetype)
allie
ashton
dee (possibly hopeless/phaedrus)
drd252
eunice
hkkmr
hoodrat
jriddy
jxrtes
rmcnew
smccosker
steve

hopeless cases who do not listen (ie phaedrus archetype)
bulletsanddoves
consentingadult
crazedrat
cyclops
dioklecian
FDG
hitta
hugo
jadae
jarno
machintruc
mikemex
phaedrus
tcaudilllg

don't seem to care
bionicgoat
cpig
cracka
garmonbozia
pitbull
subterranean
themime

special case
strrrng


i have omitted myself. one other name has been inconspicuously omitted that should be included on the basis of socionics views alone.

I think I may have missed Mea out, because I didn't want to put her in "no socionics views" because I think she does care about socionics, but I haven't really ever seen her express any. Indeed, reyn_til_runa is someone I've only had a glimpse of, but I felt the ideas she expressed were most likely representative of her ideas overall, which were, to my mind, consistent.

What I'm impressed by is that you guys are able to mentally keep track of all those people.

I just used the Member List and went down in post order.

WHY AM I NEVER INCLUDED IN THESE SORTS OF LISTS?!??!?!


IVE BEEN HERE FOR 3 YEARS DAMNIT!

Sorry, I don't know why I missed you. Maybe it's your post count. I'd put you on the "don't care" list.

ive been here longer than him too.

I have more posts.

Uhm, how come ScarlettLux is one level down but still in the top set?

Basically, it means I believe her views are okay, but they may - note: may - need readjusting. I'm not so sure. I think it's more of a case that her views are correct, which is why I stuck her in the top list instead of sticking her in the next list down with two stars next to her name.

Ezra,

It's sad to see that you have so much time on your hands, that you go around making lists of who's opinion you think is relevant.

When states reach a sad affair, I feel that one is getting too involved.

And I've observed over the years, that when people care too much, they stop seeing reality for what it is. They get so hell-bent on their biases, that they lose track of where they're going.

And thus I'd urge you to take a step back, and put things into perspective and ask yourself this. Is this the way I can most benefit mankind.

I can see where you're coming from, but I disagree with you. I spend comparatively little time on this forum in conjunction with the rest of my life (and even less when I go back to uni), and when I have a few hours to spare one evening, I'd rather compose this than destroy thousands of braincells getting wasted, or mooching about doing fuck all, or watching TV aimlessly. It's part social exercise, part fun.

And lol @ Ezra putting burntorange in the top category -- cause he pwned him in that thread.

BurntOrange's socionics views are fine as far as I'm concerned. His views about life are what are in conflict with mine.

[Gilly]

I think niffweed's list is more in line with the current context and less bound by previous opinions.

ahahah you just like it because you get to be special. Fucking 4.

[Blaze]

hey niff fuck you man and fuck you too ezra. hahahahaha

[Lotus]

I hate people who make lists.

[Ezra]

ahahah you just like it because you get to be special. Fucking 4.

I hate people who make lists.

You must be Fi base ("hate"). And Ti role ("lists" = negative)!

[jessica129]

I wish I was cool enough to sit and go thru the entire member list and analyze everyone. WHY CAN'T I BE THAT COOL?

oh yeah, i have a life.