# Thread: GCPT : Generalised Cognitive-Physiological Table

1. ## GCPT : Generalised Cognitive-Physiological Table

This is the first official version of GCPT. This table is public domain, kinda like easyTIM.

Feel free to comment.

2. what are the colors and numbers? (sorry if that's a dumb question)

3. Originally Posted by redbaron
what are the colors and numbers? (sorry if that's a dumb question)
Numbers designate correlations.

Colours designate the same thing. Uncoloured combinations don't exist.

4. Originally Posted by ifmd95
so the commas would be decimal points in U.S. notation? but then how can you have multiple perfect correlations in a single row or column? and wouldn't only correlations of zero "not exist"?
Even a correlation of .500 designates a combination that doesn't exist, because .600 < .618

In France, we use commas.

5. Originally Posted by ifmd95
The significance of .618 being the reciprocal of Phi?
yeah

Originally Posted by ifmd95
I assumed correlation to mean empirical frequency. If not, then what more specifically does each cell signify? (How were the values derived?)
they aren't frequencies, but rather correlation indices.

6. For those who like Enneagram :

1 : J
2 : F
3 : ET + IST
4 : I
5 : I + EN
6 : (J - ESTJ) + (FP - ESFP)
7 : E
8 : IS + ET
9 : (P - ESTP) + ENFJ

7. Originally Posted by machintruc
For those who like Enneagram :

1 : J
2 : F
3 : ET + IST
4 : I
5 : I + EN
6 : (J - ESTJ) + (FP - ESFP)
7 : E
8 : IS + ET
9 : (P - ESTP) + ENFJ
yeah I agree with that.

8. Originally Posted by machintruc
For those who like Enneagram :

1 : J
2 : F
3 : ET + IST
4 : I
5 : I + EN
6 : (J - ESTJ) + (FP - ESFP)
7 : E
8 : IS + ET
9 : (P - ESTP) + ENFJ
Three I can only see LSI for if they are introverted, sensory, and logical (SLI seems stupid, but I'd love to hear a case). I find it extremely difficult to see anything but intuition for the Four. Nine is ridiculous. The rest I can see the case for.

9. Originally Posted by Ezra
Three I can only see LSI for if they are introverted, sensory, and logical (SLI seems stupid, but I'd love to hear a case). I find it extremely difficult to see anything but intuition for the Four. Nine is ridiculous. The rest I can see the case for.

0-+ SLI

--- SEI

Sorry, Ez

EDIT: You remind me Phaedrus

What's the problem with Nine ?

10. Originally Posted by machintruc

Sorry, Ez

EDIT: You remind me Phaedrus
lol, i've thought this quite often.

11. Originally Posted by ifmd95
The prediction curve regressed onto the response variable? ("r sub c")
The response variable regressed onto the explanatory variable? ("r", more common of the two)

And then what are your variables?

It would be more useful if you explained how the values were derived.
I just computed correlation scores and normalised them.

12. Originally Posted by ifmd95
well you can normalize data a number of ways. variances are normalized for sample size. you can calculate r correlation from variance. but because of cancelling out in the numerator and denominator of the r calculation, there's often no need to normalize the result. although if you're doing something like signal or image processing -- there are normalization procedures there including scale and contrast.