Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Two Socionics Resources

  1. #1
    Board philosopher or bored philosopher? jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    884
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Two Socionics Resources

    I don't how well-known these are, so I better mention them:

    1) http://www.socionics.in.ua/eng/sociotyp.htm

    This is a Socionics website with some articles. It is clear it's translated from Russian, but it's understandable. Also, here are the descriptions of the types:

    http://www.socionics.in.ua/eng/harakter/01-ile.htm

    Maybe someone can evaluate how good the information is at this site.

    2) www.archive.org

    I don't know if you've heard of this, but this is an indirect resource (and a good resource for things other than Socionics); you can type in the address of Socionics websites that no longer exist (or look for older pages of existing resources) and access their information.

    Jason
    LII

  2. #2
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    I don't how well-known these are, so I better mention them:

    1) http://www.socionics.in.ua/eng/sociotyp.htm

    This is a Socionics website with some articles. It is clear it's translated from Russian, but it's understandable. Also, here are the descriptions of the types:

    http://www.socionics.in.ua/eng/harakter/01-ile.htm

    Maybe someone can evaluate how good the information is at this site.
    It's quite weak.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  3. #3
    Board philosopher or bored philosopher? jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    884
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    It's quite weak.
    Yeah, I noticed the definitions seemed weak for introversion/extraversion and rationality/irrationality, but I wasn't sure about the type descriptions, etc. It would be nice if there were more good Socionics resources in English.

    Jason
    LII

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,833
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    Yeah, I noticed the definitions seemed weak for introversion/extraversion and rationality/irrationality
    No, they are not weak. There is nothing particularly wrong with them. What is said there is generally true.

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m
    but I wasn't sure about the type descriptions, etc.
    The type descriptions are not too bad either. You should never ever stick to just one type descriptions. You should always form your overall picture of a certain type based on many different type descriptions -- including those on that site.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •