## View Poll Results: How accurate is that combination model ?

Voters
2. You may not vote on this poll
• very accurate (exact or almost)

0 0%
• fairly accurate (approximate but globally fair)

1 50.00%
• unaccurate (roughly approximate)

0 0%
• very unaccurate (neither an exact model nor an approximate one)

1 50.00%

# Thread: The 152-combination IM Type / Phitype correlation model (with Excel spreadsheet)

1. ## The 152-combination IM Type / Phitype correlation model (with Excel spreadsheet)

Socionics and Enneagram computated in a single table for the first time !

Finally, I managed to calculate how much a phitype is compatible with an IM type. It's pretty rough, but it gives an idea.

(if you want to see the actual combination table straightaway, go down)

http://www.2shared.com/file/3806651/.../calc_phi.html

According to that table, gross results are like :

--- SLI SEI ILI IEI
--0 ESI / LSI SEI EII
--+ LSI SLI / LSE SLE ESI SEI
-0- ILI IEI / SLI SEI LII EII
-00 ESI EII / ESE EIE LII IEI
-0+ LSE SLE LSI SLI / ESE SEE LIE ILE ESI SEI LII ILI
-+- ILI IEI / ILE IEE LII EII
-+0 EIE EII / ESE LIE IEE ESI LII IEI
-++ LSE SLE LIE ILE / ESE SEE EIE IEE LSI SLI LII ILI
0-- LSI SLI LII ILI / ESI SEI EII IEI
0-0 LSI ESI / LSE ESE LII EII
0-+ LSE LSI / SLE SLI / ESE LIE ESI LII
00- LII ILI / LIE ILE LSI SLI EII IEI
000 LSE ESE LIE EIE LSI ESI LII EII
00+ LSE / SLE LIE LSI / ESE ILE SLI LII
0+- LIE ILE LII ILI / EIE IEE EII IEI
0+0 LIE EIE / LSE ESE LII EII
0++ LSE LIE / SLE ILE
+-- SEI IEI / SEE IEE SLI ILI
+-0 ESE SEE ESI SEI / EIE IEE EII IEI
+-+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE SLI SEI
+0- IEE IEI / SEE ILE SEI ILI / SLE EIE SLI EII
+00 ESE SEE EIE IEE
+0+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE ILE IEE
++- IEE / ILE IEI / SEE EIE ILI
++0 EIE IEE / ESE SEE
+++ SLE SEE ILE IEE

There are 182 combinations for now. These results are still approximate. For example, -00's can't be ESE's.

If we take negative-phisum Extrotims and positive-phisum Introtims, results would be like this :

--- SLI SEI ILI IEI
--0 ESI / LSI SEI EII
--+ LSI SLI / ESI SEI
-0- ILI IEI / SLI SEI LII EII
-00 ESI EII / LII IEI
-0+ LSE SLE LSI SLI / ESE SEE LIE ILE ESI SEI LII ILI
-+- ILI IEI / LII EII
-+0 EIE EII / ESE LIE IEE ESI LII IEI
-++ LSE SLE LIE ILE / ESE SEE EIE IEE
0-- LSI SLI LII ILI / ESI SEI EII IEI
0-0 LSI ESI / LII EII
0-+ LSE LSI / SLE SLI / ESE LIE ESI LII
00- LII ILI / LSI SLI EII IEI
000 LSE ESE LIE EIE LSI ESI LII EII
00+ LSE / SLE LIE / ESE ILE
0+- LIE ILE LII ILI / EIE IEE EII IEI
0+0 LIE EIE / LSE ESE
0++ LSE LIE / SLE ILE
+-- SEI IEI / SLI ILI
+-0 ESE SEE ESI SEI / EIE IEE EII IEI
+-+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE
+0- IEE IEI / SEE ILE SEI ILI / SLE EIE SLI EII
+00 ESE SEE EIE IEE
+0+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE ILE IEE
++- IEE / ILE / SEE EIE
++0 EIE IEE / ESE SEE
+++ SLE SEE ILE IEE

This temporary result has 157 combinations. It looks more realistic.

All IM types have 4 or 8 combinations, except :

-0+ has 12 combinations
+0- has 10 combinations
-0-, 00-, and +0+ have 6 combinations
00+ has 5 combinations

Besides, we can see that -++ and 0-- have 8 combinations, while not being null-phisum phitypes.

We'll make these corrections :

-0+ and +0- are both null-phisum.

We take away ESE, ILE, LII, and ILI from -0+
-0+ LSE SLE LSI SLI / SEE LIE ESI SEI

We take away SLE and SLI from +0-
+0- IEE IEI / SEE ILE SEI ILI / EIE EII

We take away

Maybe 00+ should have 6 combinations instead of 4 (sic), because the modification would be lighter.

00+ LSE / SLE LIE / ESE ILE / SEE

Now, we have an hypothetic 152-combination model :

--- SLI SEI ILI IEI
--0 ESI / LSI SEI EII
--+ LSI SLI / ESI SEI
-0- ILI IEI / SLI SEI LII EII
-00 ESI EII / LII IEI
-0+ LSE SLE LSI SLI / SEE LIE ESI SEI
-+- ILI IEI / LII EII
-+0 EIE EII / ESE LIE IEE ESI LII IEI
-++ LSE SLE LIE ILE / ESE SEE EIE IEE
0-- LSI SLI LII ILI / ESI SEI EII IEI
0-0 LSI ESI / LII EII
0-+ LSE LSI / SLE SLI / ESE LIE ESI LII
00- LII ILI / LSI SLI EII IEI
000 LSE ESE LIE EIE LSI ESI LII EII
00+ LSE / SLE LIE / ESE ILE / SEE
0+- LIE ILE LII ILI / EIE IEE EII IEI
0+0 LIE EIE / LSE ESE
0++ LSE LIE / SLE ILE
+-- SEI IEI / SLI ILI
+-0 ESE SEE ESI SEI / EIE IEE EII IEI
+-+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE
+0- IEE IEI / SEE ILE SEI ILI / EIE EII
+00 ESE SEE EIE IEE
+0+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE ILE IEE
++- IEE / ILE / SEE EIE
++0 EIE IEE / ESE SEE
+++ SLE SEE ILE IEE

EDIT: I forgot to take away 4 types from -++ and 4 types from 0--, because they had 8 IM types each, while not null-phisum :

-++ LSE SLE LIE ILE / ESE SEE EIE IEE
0-- LSI SLI LII ILI / ESI SEI EII IEI

The actual model has 144 combinations :

--- SLI SEI ILI IEI
--0 ESI / LSI SEI EII
--+ LSI SLI / ESI SEI
-0- ILI IEI / SLI SEI LII EII
-00 ESI EII / LII IEI
-0+ LSE SLE LSI SLI / SEE LIE ESI SEI
-+- ILI IEI / LII EII
-+0 EIE EII / ESE LIE IEE ESI LII IEI
-++ LSE SLE LIE / SEE
0-- SLI LII ILI / EII
0-0 LSI ESI / LII EII
0-+ LSE LSI / SLE SLI / ESE LIE ESI LII
00- LII ILI / LSI SLI EII IEI
000 LSE ESE LIE EIE LSI ESI LII EII
00+ LSE / SLE LIE / ESE ILE / SEE
0+- LIE ILE LII ILI / EIE IEE EII IEI
0+0 LIE EIE / LSE ESE
0++ LSE LIE / SLE ILE
+-- SEI IEI / SLI ILI
+-0 ESE SEE ESI SEI / EIE IEE EII IEI
+-+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE
+0- IEE IEI / SEE ILE SEI ILI / EIE EII
+00 ESE SEE EIE IEE
+0+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE ILE IEE
++- IEE / ILE / SEE EIE
++0 EIE IEE / ESE SEE
+++ SLE SEE ILE IEE

Slashes ("/") separate the most probable IM types (to the left) and IM types that exist, but are less probable.

For example, +-- has an equal probability for SEI and IEI, and an equal probability for SLI and ILI. The former two are more probable and the latter two are less probable.

Whenever I have some minor modifications, I'll post them here.

2. I'm just glad that I've typed myself appropriately if these typings hold true.

3. http://www.2shared.com/file/3807702/...alc_phi_2.html

Here is the whole score table (absolute and relative scores). Again, Excel format.

4. still experimenting...

I'm already proud of myself, even though this all is just transitory result

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•