View Poll Results: How accurate is that combination model ?

Voters
2. You may not vote on this poll
  • very accurate (exact or almost)

    0 0%
  • fairly accurate (approximate but globally fair)

    1 50.00%
  • unaccurate (roughly approximate)

    0 0%
  • very unaccurate (neither an exact model nor an approximate one)

    1 50.00%
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: The 152-combination IM Type / Phitype correlation model (with Excel spreadsheet)

  1. #1
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default The 152-combination IM Type / Phitype correlation model (with Excel spreadsheet)

    Socionics and Enneagram computated in a single table for the first time !

    Finally, I managed to calculate how much a phitype is compatible with an IM type. It's pretty rough, but it gives an idea.

    (if you want to see the actual combination table straightaway, go down)

    http://www.2shared.com/file/3806651/.../calc_phi.html

    According to that table, gross results are like :

    --- SLI SEI ILI IEI
    --0 ESI / LSI SEI EII
    --+ LSI SLI / LSE SLE ESI SEI
    -0- ILI IEI / SLI SEI LII EII
    -00 ESI EII / ESE EIE LII IEI
    -0+ LSE SLE LSI SLI / ESE SEE LIE ILE ESI SEI LII ILI
    -+- ILI IEI / ILE IEE LII EII
    -+0 EIE EII / ESE LIE IEE ESI LII IEI
    -++ LSE SLE LIE ILE / ESE SEE EIE IEE LSI SLI LII ILI
    0-- LSI SLI LII ILI / ESI SEI EII IEI
    0-0 LSI ESI / LSE ESE LII EII
    0-+ LSE LSI / SLE SLI / ESE LIE ESI LII
    00- LII ILI / LIE ILE LSI SLI EII IEI
    000 LSE ESE LIE EIE LSI ESI LII EII
    00+ LSE / SLE LIE LSI / ESE ILE SLI LII
    0+- LIE ILE LII ILI / EIE IEE EII IEI
    0+0 LIE EIE / LSE ESE LII EII
    0++ LSE LIE / SLE ILE
    +-- SEI IEI / SEE IEE SLI ILI
    +-0 ESE SEE ESI SEI / EIE IEE EII IEI
    +-+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE SLI SEI
    +0- IEE IEI / SEE ILE SEI ILI / SLE EIE SLI EII
    +00 ESE SEE EIE IEE
    +0+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE ILE IEE
    ++- IEE / ILE IEI / SEE EIE ILI
    ++0 EIE IEE / ESE SEE
    +++ SLE SEE ILE IEE


    There are 182 combinations for now. These results are still approximate. For example, -00's can't be ESE's.



    If we take negative-phisum Extrotims and positive-phisum Introtims, results would be like this :

    --- SLI SEI ILI IEI
    --0 ESI / LSI SEI EII
    --+ LSI SLI / ESI SEI
    -0- ILI IEI / SLI SEI LII EII
    -00 ESI EII / LII IEI
    -0+ LSE SLE LSI SLI / ESE SEE LIE ILE ESI SEI LII ILI
    -+- ILI IEI / LII EII
    -+0 EIE EII / ESE LIE IEE ESI LII IEI
    -++ LSE SLE LIE ILE / ESE SEE EIE IEE
    0-- LSI SLI LII ILI / ESI SEI EII IEI
    0-0 LSI ESI / LII EII
    0-+ LSE LSI / SLE SLI / ESE LIE ESI LII
    00- LII ILI / LSI SLI EII IEI
    000 LSE ESE LIE EIE LSI ESI LII EII
    00+ LSE / SLE LIE / ESE ILE
    0+- LIE ILE LII ILI / EIE IEE EII IEI
    0+0 LIE EIE / LSE ESE
    0++ LSE LIE / SLE ILE
    +-- SEI IEI / SLI ILI
    +-0 ESE SEE ESI SEI / EIE IEE EII IEI
    +-+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE
    +0- IEE IEI / SEE ILE SEI ILI / SLE EIE SLI EII
    +00 ESE SEE EIE IEE
    +0+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE ILE IEE
    ++- IEE / ILE / SEE EIE
    ++0 EIE IEE / ESE SEE
    +++ SLE SEE ILE IEE


    This temporary result has 157 combinations. It looks more realistic.

    All IM types have 4 or 8 combinations, except :

    -0+ has 12 combinations
    +0- has 10 combinations
    -0-, 00-, and +0+ have 6 combinations
    00+ has 5 combinations

    Besides, we can see that -++ and 0-- have 8 combinations, while not being null-phisum phitypes.

    We'll make these corrections :

    -0+ and +0- are both null-phisum.

    We take away ESE, ILE, LII, and ILI from -0+
    -0+ LSE SLE LSI SLI / SEE LIE ESI SEI

    We take away SLE and SLI from +0-
    +0- IEE IEI / SEE ILE SEI ILI / EIE EII

    We take away


    Maybe 00+ should have 6 combinations instead of 4 (sic), because the modification would be lighter.

    We add SEE to 00+
    00+ LSE / SLE LIE / ESE ILE / SEE



    Now, we have an hypothetic 152-combination model :

    --- SLI SEI ILI IEI
    --0 ESI / LSI SEI EII
    --+ LSI SLI / ESI SEI
    -0- ILI IEI / SLI SEI LII EII
    -00 ESI EII / LII IEI
    -0+ LSE SLE LSI SLI / SEE LIE ESI SEI
    -+- ILI IEI / LII EII
    -+0 EIE EII / ESE LIE IEE ESI LII IEI
    -++ LSE SLE LIE ILE / ESE SEE EIE IEE
    0-- LSI SLI LII ILI / ESI SEI EII IEI
    0-0 LSI ESI / LII EII
    0-+ LSE LSI / SLE SLI / ESE LIE ESI LII
    00- LII ILI / LSI SLI EII IEI
    000 LSE ESE LIE EIE LSI ESI LII EII
    00+ LSE / SLE LIE / ESE ILE / SEE
    0+- LIE ILE LII ILI / EIE IEE EII IEI
    0+0 LIE EIE / LSE ESE
    0++ LSE LIE / SLE ILE
    +-- SEI IEI / SLI ILI
    +-0 ESE SEE ESI SEI / EIE IEE EII IEI
    +-+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE
    +0- IEE IEI / SEE ILE SEI ILI / EIE EII
    +00 ESE SEE EIE IEE
    +0+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE ILE IEE
    ++- IEE / ILE / SEE EIE
    ++0 EIE IEE / ESE SEE
    +++ SLE SEE ILE IEE



    EDIT: I forgot to take away 4 types from -++ and 4 types from 0--, because they had 8 IM types each, while not null-phisum :

    -++ LSE SLE LIE ILE / ESE SEE EIE IEE
    0-- LSI SLI LII ILI / ESI SEI EII IEI

    The actual model has 144 combinations :

    --- SLI SEI ILI IEI
    --0 ESI / LSI SEI EII
    --+ LSI SLI / ESI SEI
    -0- ILI IEI / SLI SEI LII EII
    -00 ESI EII / LII IEI
    -0+ LSE SLE LSI SLI / SEE LIE ESI SEI
    -+- ILI IEI / LII EII
    -+0 EIE EII / ESE LIE IEE ESI LII IEI
    -++ LSE SLE LIE / SEE
    0-- SLI LII ILI / EII
    0-0 LSI ESI / LII EII
    0-+ LSE LSI / SLE SLI / ESE LIE ESI LII
    00- LII ILI / LSI SLI EII IEI
    000 LSE ESE LIE EIE LSI ESI LII EII
    00+ LSE / SLE LIE / ESE ILE / SEE
    0+- LIE ILE LII ILI / EIE IEE EII IEI
    0+0 LIE EIE / LSE ESE
    0++ LSE LIE / SLE ILE
    +-- SEI IEI / SLI ILI
    +-0 ESE SEE ESI SEI / EIE IEE EII IEI
    +-+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE
    +0- IEE IEI / SEE ILE SEI ILI / EIE EII
    +00 ESE SEE EIE IEE
    +0+ SLE SEE / LSE ESE ILE IEE
    ++- IEE / ILE / SEE EIE
    ++0 EIE IEE / ESE SEE
    +++ SLE SEE ILE IEE


    Slashes ("/") separate the most probable IM types (to the left) and IM types that exist, but are less probable.

    For example, +-- has an equal probability for SEI and IEI, and an equal probability for SLI and ILI. The former two are more probable and the latter two are less probable.

    Whenever I have some minor modifications, I'll post them here.
    Last edited by machintruc; 08-22-2008 at 11:56 PM.

  2. #2
    tereg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    TIM
    EII/INFj
    Posts
    4,684
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm just glad that I've typed myself appropriately if these typings hold true.
    INFj

    9w1 sp/sx

  3. #3
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    http://www.2shared.com/file/3807702/...alc_phi_2.html

    Here is the whole score table (absolute and relative scores). Again, Excel format.

  4. #4
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    still experimenting...



    I'm already proud of myself, even though this all is just transitory result
    Last edited by machintruc; 08-23-2008 at 03:48 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •