Two Socionics Resources

[jason_m]

I don't how well-known these are, so I better mention them:

1) http://www.socionics.in.ua/eng/sociotyp.htm

This is a Socionics website with some articles. It is clear it's translated from Russian, but it's understandable. Also, here are the descriptions of the types:

http://www.socionics.in.ua/eng/harakter/01-ile.htm

Maybe someone can evaluate how good the information is at this site.

2) www.archive.org

I don't know if you've heard of this, but this is an indirect resource (and a good resource for things other than Socionics); you can type in the address of Socionics websites that no longer exist (or look for older pages of existing resources) and access their information.

Jason

[Expat]

I don't how well-known these are, so I better mention them:

1) http://www.socionics.in.ua/eng/sociotyp.htm

This is a Socionics website with some articles. It is clear it's translated from Russian, but it's understandable. Also, here are the descriptions of the types:

http://www.socionics.in.ua/eng/harakter/01-ile.htm

Maybe someone can evaluate how good the information is at this site.

It's quite weak.

[jason_m]

It's quite weak.

Yeah, I noticed the definitions seemed weak for introversion/extraversion and rationality/irrationality, but I wasn't sure about the type descriptions, etc. It would be nice if there were more good Socionics resources in English.

Jason

[Phaedrus]

Yeah, I noticed the definitions seemed weak for introversion/extraversion and rationality/irrationality

No, they are not weak. There is nothing particularly wrong with them. What is said there is generally true.

but I wasn't sure about the type descriptions, etc.

The type descriptions are not too bad either. You should never ever stick to just one type descriptions. You should always form your overall picture of a certain type based on many different type descriptions -- including those on that site.