View Poll Results: Quality of website ...

Voters
116. You may not vote on this poll
  • Has definatelly improved

    0 0%
  • Has stayed about the same

    0 0%
  • Has somewhat degenerated

    0 0%
  • Has allowed me to gain a diffrent perspective I may not have learned elsewhere

    0 0%
  • Probably should not exist, but only because I would rather spend my time reading translated Russian text or Ganin descriptions at socionics.com

    0 0%
  • I think you are a fraud, a plagerist, and am trying to make a name for yourself.

    0 0%
  • Is crap, but I am ignorant about socionics so what do I know ...

    0 0%
  • 116 100.00%
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Socioninfo - quality poll

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Socion.info - quality poll ...

    Vote! Some options were added for personal entertainment purposes!

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hmmm, I just noticed I have been a sloppy speller lately ...

  3. #3
    Hiding Typhon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Valhalla
    TIM
    Ni-ENFj
    Posts
    2,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Did you write your decriptions? Becase I found them to be accurate, your explanation of the functions has helped me gain new insight.

  4. #4
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I like the descriptions of the functions, but the old descriptions were great too. You should bring those back, then put the functional analysis below it. It's not not as interesting now
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  5. #5
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Something that should be considered (and perhaps discussed here) -- the PoLR, and perhaps hidden agenda, do not show the same symptoms in the two types sharing them. For instance, the PoLR seems to be different for ENTj and ENFj. The functional descriptions in socion.info do not make this distinction. Perhaps they need to be more type-specific (which I know is extra work).
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  6. #6
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Also, a list of descriptions as they exist outside of how they pertain specifically to each type would do good, especially for people who are reading about the functions for the first time.

    I'd be willing to help, it you don't want to undertake that kind of thing on your own. I bet Rocky might be up for that kind of thing as well (although I won't volunteer him).
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  7. #7
    Hiding Typhon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Valhalla
    TIM
    Ni-ENFj
    Posts
    2,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat
    Something that should be considered (and perhaps discussed here) -- the PoLR, and perhaps hidden agenda, do not show the same symptoms in the two types sharing them. For instance, the PoLR seems to be different for ENTj and ENFj. The functional descriptions in socion.info do not make this distinction. Perhaps they need to be more type-specific (which I know is extra work).
    The problem with what your proposing is that for INTp and INFp(for example) is bit different, but not very much so, so focusing on how differs in INFP and INTP would just be focusing on details which are too specific and leaving out the general idea. This is the problem with the descriptions "by function" on socionics.com

    I think it would be better just to write another set of descriptions not going by function.

  8. #8
    Hiding Typhon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Valhalla
    TIM
    Ni-ENFj
    Posts
    2,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    for the sake of clarity, that was me as guest.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat
    Something that should be considered (and perhaps discussed here) -- the PoLR, and perhaps hidden agenda, do not show the same symptoms in the two types sharing them. For instance, the PoLR seems to be different for ENTj and ENFj. The functional descriptions in socion.info do not make this distinction. Perhaps they need to be more type-specific (which I know is extra work).
    Exactly, and I am aware that there are slight diffrences. But, in order to write the descriptions fast I was forced to do generalizations between accepting and producing functions. Eventually I plan on making them more type specific.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Btw ... I wrote this to help complement the type descriptions ...

    http://socion.info/smpsyche.html

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gilligan87
    I like the descriptions of the functions, but the old descriptions were great too. You should bring those back, then put the functional analysis below it. It's not not as interesting now
    I am debating whether to bring the old descriptions back or to find a way to write or generate (the functional descriptions are actually generated by the cgi script for consistency purposes) descriptions that are more in sync with each other.

  12. #12
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Know what would be amazingly cool but take a rediculous amount of time and work? If, for each type, we had another type's perspective on that type. How cool would that be?
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  13. #13
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,632
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gilligan87
    Know what would be amazingly cool but take a rediculous amount of time and work? If, for each type, we had another type's perspective on that type. How cool would that be?
    This is a good idea
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  14. #14
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  15. #15
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes, perhaps each type should write about their conflictor?
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    edit

  17. #17
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ILENTp
    Ideally we should get every type's perspective on every type .
    That alone would be 256 perspectives - -
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  18. #18

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    edit

  19. #19
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think there should be tie breaker questions for each type.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  20. #20

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    edit

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •