SEE yeah?
Barefoot Doctor aka Stephen Russell
SEE yeah?
He is very red.
And I would hide my face in you and you would hide your face in me, and nobody would ever see us any more.
lol yes he is. Which type is most likely to have lobster face?
I'd buy Se ego. All hot and bothered?
I'm not too good with VI.
He kinda reminds me of Jack Nicholson, who I read is Se ego as well.
So maybe SEE is viable.
And I would hide my face in you and you would hide your face in me, and nobody would ever see us any more.
Haha, He is a bit. I am pretty sure he is SEE. I am trying to type someone else partly using that so want to make sure I'm not missing other possibilities.
He is literally the groovy guru figure. He loves mischief and causes controversy by being a bit of a player. I spent some time around him with people saying we were very alike. But when we spoke about/planned concrete stuff there was a lot of misunderstanding. Super-ego?
ethic, extravert
SLI
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
why?Originally Posted by Maritsa Darmandzhyan
His overall demeanor is relaxed and comfortable, no movement that is "humorous" or expressive of Fe emotions, that leads me to type that as Fi ground. Talks about his art and craft from the perspective of what he does, in a practical sense. So he strives to be a practical object...Te; he obviously doesn't like certain environments of study, finds them boring, but does not express spikes of emotions that may stir someone's emotions along with him, again devalued Fe. His overall tone of speaking is even, soft, not so much movement.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
He is actually very adept at sweeping people up and manipulating emotions. That's why he is so good at what he does. He's a HUGE extrovert and only sleeps about 4 hours a night to cram more things into the day. Stillness and softness will come from any Taoist teacher. Also, speaking in a practical manner about what he does means that he appeals to a larger audience rather than just dippy hippy types. This will definitely have occurred to him.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
