The descriptions at Socionics.com, and some of the subtype descriptions on Wikisocion are based on Victor Gulenko's work. What I like about his descriptions is that they are based on real behaviours, as opposed to function descriptions. I relate to his descriptions of types that are similar to me somewhat more than I can relate to the descriptions created by others. This doesn't mean that the other descriptions are bad, I just prefer his descriptions. What do you think of his work? Can you relate well to his descriptions of your type?