you guys would be such amazing duals.
LSE
LSI
Other (please post)
you guys would be such amazing duals.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Actually I was much more dramatic at first. I'm just trying my best to be forthright nowadays. What I said about my mother is probably very much the case. And I don't think you were being anywhere CLOSE to completely sarcastic.
Yes I am positive I understand Te/Fi vs Fe/Ti differences. I don't think they are easily observable online, unless we are to trust everything that people say about themselves, which I think is, while an admirable sentiment, probably not the most accurate, "honest" way to go about typing.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
This was more about something that we had superficially shared in the distant past instead of something we share now. Which is somewhat different. Anyways I do not find those things all that important. These kind of common interests are more like a bonus than a must for me. I would be interested to know whether or not it actually tells something about functions or just about individuals.
UDP is not LSE.
If you want an example of LSE, look at Heath. He's always joking around, and doesn't take himself very seriously at all. Basically the opposite of UDP in that respect (Si ego vs. Se ego).
i am quite the face maker. http://s5.photobucket.com/albums/y15...t=HPIM0076.flv here is a video i made a while back. i am not very handsome in person.
asd
Nice video heath hehe.
I do agree about them not scoffing at stupid rules though, definitely.
"Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities..."
- Voltaire
To me, he seems as LSE as LSE can be. Not all LSEs are that super outgoing energetic type. Maybe it's a subtype thing, but I have 3 very good friends that I've known a long time who are LSE -- 2 are the crazy energetic spunky kinds and the other I really thought might be introverted for a while, until I realized he was just a more serious/quiet version.
The way UDP writes posts reminds me of how this LSE I know would write, and I don't think anything he's written has annoyed me, vs. how I would react to what a conflictor would write.
LSEs (even the super outgoing energetic ones) are very serious under that and like always thinking in that clear way. I just saw one of those little-kid chairs that was a tiny version of an expensive-looking black leather living room chair, and I could totally picture a tiny little LSE sitting in it with reading glasses, using big words (that would pretty much be the same vocab as most in their mid 20's), with a tiny little copy of The Economist in hand, or something like that. Then they'd be like "well, I need to go prepare my lunch for pre-school today" and would hurry off quickly, wearing a tiny business casual outfit...yup, that was off topic.
Hi! I'm an ENFP. :-)
on stupid 'traditional' rules each nt type will act accordingly:
ILE will make sure to embarass you and try to provoke you to notice the stupidity of the rules in front of authority figures, and will generally annoy the shit out of you about the rules by focusing attention on you especially if you generally disagree with the rules but don't care to take action.
LII and ILI will get angry and will explain why the rules are stupid, and no one will give a shit. EVER.
LIE is too involved in talking about anything and everything to pay much heed to rules. he will break the rules out of ignorance.
asd
some of The Stupid in this thread gives me heartburn
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
I wish we had more LSE's here.
"Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities..."
- Voltaire