Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: Socionics Type Assistant scores

  1. #1
    Creepy-Jack London

    Default Socionics Type Assistant scores

    Post your scores here. IMO this is the most reliable and valid test out there.

    http://www.socionicstypeassistant.com/stc/sta.html?3:Xa@mD}@sQdINsZ2ttuVUjFnwLfVFgrnZOsZjdo1 :jTcYvlUtPRbIyDM{KLzP@iNpIZmHvir_ESSHOI_i:

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    291
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    We all know that already what's new.

  3. #3
    Creepy-Jack London

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous
    We all know that already what's new.
    What's new is that all you losers should be using it instead of the other crap stuff I've seen here.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    354
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That "crap" typed me correctly while the socionics type assistant typed me incorrectly.

  5. #5
    Creepy-pokeball

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack London
    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous
    We all know that already what's new.
    What's new is that all you losers should be using it instead of the other crap stuff I've seen here.
    Making shoulds for us is so cute

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    237
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Jack London

    Quote Originally Posted by Zeia
    That "crap" typed me correctly while the socionics type assistant typed me incorrectly.
    I think it just typed who you wanted to be, not who you actually were.
    ENTj - intuitive subtype - 8w9, sp/sx

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    237
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jadae
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack London
    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous
    We all know that already what's new.
    What's new is that all you losers should be using it instead of the other crap stuff I've seen here.
    Making shoulds for us is so cute
    Yes, you need direction
    ENTj - intuitive subtype - 8w9, sp/sx

  8. #8
    Creepy-pokeball

    Default

    Hi Eidos and no thanks.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    354
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: Jack London

    Quote Originally Posted by Eidos
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeia
    That "crap" typed me correctly while the socionics type assistant typed me incorrectly.
    I think it just typed who you wanted to be, not who you actually were.
    Then logically tell me what I actually am, if you want to say that please back it up.

  10. #10
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,626
    Mentioned
    156 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack London
    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous
    We all know that already what's new.
    What's new is that all you losers should be using it instead of the other crap stuff I've seen here.
    I agree on the fact that the 333 stuff is crap, but keep that all you losers line for yourself.


    Socionics type assistant is very good. What I don't like of it is how he associates inductive reasoning to sensing. Crap.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  11. #11

    Default

    It works for me. But... I don't have the link anymore. It's long lost. McNews test works for me too, after you screw around with it.

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    237
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Gee, it sure takes a bit of to get you guys going

    FDG, no offense meant, dude... just wanted to get a reaction.
    ENTj - intuitive subtype - 8w9, sp/sx

  13. #13
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,626
    Mentioned
    156 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ahhaa, no, I wasn't really offended, at least for no more than 0.3 seconds.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    237
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    Ahhaa, no, I wasn't really offended, at least for no more than 0.3 seconds.
    OK then :wink:
    ENTj - intuitive subtype - 8w9, sp/sx

  15. #15
    Creepy-Diana

    Default

    .

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ich bin ein ubel glied
    Posts
    8,198
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack London
    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous
    We all know that already what's new.
    What's new is that all you losers should be using it instead of the other crap stuff I've seen here.
    I agree on the fact that the 333 stuff is crap, but keep that all you losers line for yourself.

    Socionics type assistant is very good. What I don't like of it is how he associates inductive reasoning to sensing. Crap.
    Typology test are essentially what you make out of them ...if you manipulate the results in a direction you know will be a certain type, that is crap. On the other hand, if you get pissed at a typology test because you do not know enough about the theory behind it to begin with, that is also crap.

    But, the honest question is why should you really be relying much on typology test to begin with if you atttitude is that it will give you an easy answer without doing any real research into the theory behind it? I agree, sounds more to me like a person with that sort of attitude is wasting his or her time.

    And the only diffrences between the test that Sergei Ganin made and the one I made is that you need to know more than the basics of socionics to understand the results, and I also have made research into doing detection for the hidden agenda and suggestive function. So, other than the fact that Ganin's test is prone to error in result of those functions the end results are the same.

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    291
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Tests work best when you have no or very little idea what you gonna get at the end (you still have to be honest though). Once you know how it works, then as rmc said, you begin consciously or subconsciously manipulate the result. Testing over and over again IMO waste of time. Trying to validate some new test by taking it knowing well your type and how it all works will validate nothing. Pretending that you are a noob and don't really know anything about the whole thing while validating a new test is even worse.

  18. #18

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    291
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    What I don't like of it is how he associates inductive reasoning to sensing.
    What do you mean inductive reasoning to sensing?

  19. #19
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,750
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    6w5 sx
    model Φ: -+0
    sloan - rcuei

  20. #20

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    291
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lol, Borat from Kazhashtan

  21. #21
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,750
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    eez nice. i like.
    6w5 sx
    model Φ: -+0
    sloan - rcuei

  22. #22
    Creepy-

    Default

    INTj

    I feel it more everyday...

  23. #23

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    291
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    eez nice. i like.
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...37597661828199


  24. #24

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •