Greetings everyone. I've been investigating this concept of type for at least a year now, and my lack of ability to decide (1) whether or not the system is valid (which I suspect will take a more general understanding of what makes something valid in science) and (2) what my type is, has caused my mind to spin a lot of cycles on the topic, and it's making me dizzy.

While I feel resolved on the factors I, T, and P, I can't tip the balance to either side on S vs. N. I've thought about it, and decided that rather than feeding you a bias-filled description of myself, I'll just give you my journal URL as a starting point: http://livejournal.com/~mpnolan

Throw me your wildest ideas about my overall type (maybe you even think I'm an E?FJ ) and I'll evaluate them.