since everyone else is doing it

[alex]

You act like my ESFp friend online (similar phrasing, constant talking, amazing number of interests on lj). Who knows about real life, though.

[Catholic Schoolboy]

Lets talk about Implied and what type she is now.

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Gilly]

ISFj.

I remember seeing that video of her a while ago, and thinking that she had that "Someone tell me what to do..." look on her face. Plus...look at the title.

This obviously isn't enough info, and I haven't observed her behavior enough to do a real typing; it's just my current inclination.

[Expat]

I haven't seen any reason to change my opinion.

Implied herself has said that she dislikes the idea of being an XNTx and very often, especially when interacting with me, shows a clear dislike for the ENTj way of looking at things and an identification with the ESFp way. She has displayed this quite consistently. Also, her immediate reaction to my comments on ESFps was to suggest that I have a personal problem with them - use of , not . So I really see no case for XNTx.

When asked about whether she was sure of the types of the huge list the gave, she replied "very very very sure".

Maybe I'm reading too much into this but this is so what an ISXj would say, once they have reached a conclusion, a symptom of their hidden agenda. I don't think most strong types would have replied in that way.

The only problem with that is that Implied identified with an ENFp profile. Yet she also said that ENFps annoy her . If she is ISFj that will make sense.

Again I'll say that I have little doubt that she is XSFx. I'm just going to be a bit intuitive and say that I get more a rational than irrational vibe from her, and that I don't think she sounds ESFj.

She likes and admires ESFps but doesn't sound like one of them, and doesn't think she is one herself.

So I still think ISFj it is.

[Creepy-pokeball]

That was my guess like 3 weeks ago. Im still listening for further evidence of possibility for everything tho.

[Expat]

I'll go even further and say that implied is ISFj ethical subtype.

But of course I'm also open to further evidence.

[Hugo]

She is definately esfp after I had a discussion with her.

[Joy]

When she tells stories, she uses descriptions. ISxj or maybe ESFp.

[XoX]

Lol. 11 types have at least one vote. On the other hand none of the extroverted thinking types gained a vote. I guess the main result from this poll is you are NOT any ExTx type.

[Gilly]

Let's get these out of the way:

Little/no Se
Little/no Te
Little/No Ne

Most likely an introvert.

[Joy]

no Ne

[implied]

[Hugo]

that's because of role function for esfp

[Expat]

ok Implied, fair enough, but what type then do you think you are? An XNFx?

I can only work with the information I get from you. If you're sure you're not ISFj, fine.

[implied]

[implied]

[implied]

[Kim]

I have always been fond of supervisory relationships as we know, yay!

[implied]

[Catholic Schoolboy]

Told you do.

Good girl.


Now if only everyone would come to terms with the fact that I am ISFj I would be ery pleased.

[Cone]

I'll pick you up at 8:00 in June, implied.

Sycophant can come too, if she's really ISFj.

Hell, even Olga can come.

But you other ISFjs will have to sit in the backseat.

[Kim]

I want to pull a Joy, too! I'm ISFj! Yay for duality!

[XoX]

i'm going to stick with ISFj ethical subtype.
...
hello ENTjs, i'm your dual (except for Expat, who i just argue with a lot.)

Well...you just agreed with Expat...

[Kim]

I am ISTp! Woohoo duality!

Yay, then I can still be an ENFp and supervise implied! Yay!

[Catholic Schoolboy]

I'll pick you up at 8:00 in June, implied.

Sycophant can come too, if she's really ISFj.

Hell, even Olga can come.

But you other ISFjs will have to sit in the backseat.

Cone is a pimp!

[implied]

[Kim]

awwwww

/me dances a special ENFp mating dance for implied and cone and watches events unfold

[Cone]

Stay tuned for more flirting!

[Catholic Schoolboy]

/me thinks Kim uses the chat too much.

On the other hand....


...awwwwww

[Kim]

/me thinks Kim uses the chat too much.

/me thinks this is entirely true, but witnessing fragile love connections unfold is worth wasting her life away.

They are so ADORABLE!!

[Expat]

hello ENTjs, i'm your dual (except for Expat, who i just argue with a lot.)

On the contrary, it means that our duality is at more advanced stages.

Wasn't I the first one to say clearly you were ISFj? And didn't you welcome my input in the end? :wink:

[Cone]

Why would you say ISFj?

[Expat]

Why would you say ISFj?

To sum it up - -

I never bought INTj, not only because she was far too fond, and admiring of, ESFps, although that was the main clue. The "vibe" I got from her when making points was and , seldom . So very early on I thought XSFx was the most likely.

She said she was "very very very" sure of the typings of a huge number of people, which I personally tend to associate with types, more specifically, with the hidden agenda of ISFjs and ISTjs.

I happen to know many examples of all four XSFx types, and I could not see her as ESFj or ISFp. ESFp always remained possible, but Implied herself did not seem to fully identify with them.

Also, she does use far more than ESFps, even as it's clear to me that it's weaker than her , which is very familiar to me since I kno/ew many ISFjs.

Finally, assuming she'd be ISFj, I could see her a split or ethical, but not sensory. And my impression of her fits well with my experience of ISFjs.

[implied]

[Joy]

My type doesn't matter at all in how happy I am in my relationship. Wierdos.

[tcaudilllg]

I don't think implied's thinking is well differentiated from her feeling.

[Cone]

My type doesn't matter at all in how happy I am in my relationship. Wierdos.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YEAH RIGHT JOY.