Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Erotic attitudes

  1. #1
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,632
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Erotic attitudes

    Lemmas to erotic attitudes:

    The more peak-resolute (the more, Ni-Se valuing the invididual) or peak-reasonable (the more Ne-Si valuing the individual), the more the individual will relate to standard Aggressor-Victim Caregiver-Infantile erotic attitudes.

    The more peak-serious (the more Te-Fi valuing the individual) or peak-merry (the more Ti-Fe valuing the individual), the less the individual will relate to standard Aggressor-Victim Caregiver-Infantile erotic attitudes.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  2. #2
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think it depends a lot more on life experience and accurate typing than it does on subtype.

    Example A: a Ne type wouldn't readily relate to descriptions of Se erotic attitudes

    Example B: a Ne type with very little relationship experience (especially with Si types) may not readily relate to the descriptions of Ne erotic attitudes
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  3. #3
    from toronto with love ScarlettLux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    TIM
    Beta sx 3w4;7w8
    Posts
    3,401
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes this makes perfect sense b/c the erotic attitudes are solely based on Si, Se, Ni, Ne values of a type. I have come to the conclusion that I am an INFp-Fe rather than ENFj-Ni ... and yes, I don't quite relate to Victim ... I mean I do, but less than the INFp-Ni guys I know! I feel like an Aggressor most of the time and I hate it when I am with another Aggressor.


    Dress pretty, play dirty ღ
    Johari
    Nohari

  4. #4
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East Coast West Coast Dirty South
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,826
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    As for what FDG wrote, I'm not so sure. I think it is just a different take on things. The Fi EIIs I have seen compared to the Ne EIIs - they are all still infantiles. The Ne type might be more openly needy or in wany of Si or something, but I don't think that really has to do with identifying with erotic attitudes. If anything I would say a broader interpretation of the attitudes would be needed, rather than trying to designate subtype differenes in this way.
    Last edited by UDP; 05-17-2008 at 09:18 PM. Reason: some high ground is not worth taking
    Pre-2013 post are written with incomplete understanding.

  5. #5
    Éminence grise mikemex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Third Planet
    TIM
    IEE-Ne
    Posts
    1,631
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It doesn't have grades I think. I'm rather infantile around my Si female friends and they love it. Period.
    [] | NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)

    You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life.
    - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.

  6. #6
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,632
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ifmd95 View Post
    no, there are significant differences in the romatic descriptions of beta vs. gamma, alpha vs. delta. i.e. differences across the rational axes. hence why Gulenko wrote descriptions for each quadra?
    Yet the general notion of erotic attitude remains the basic one i.e. whenever one speaks about erotic attitutudes he-she never means gamma-victim or beta-victim etc etc,

    for example, i think this observation applies more to gamma, rather than being gender-related in principle. (the gender-relationship may have only emerged as a consequence of there being somewhat more male thinkers than females in the population)...
    Do you mean that it would be true for a female ENTj with a male ISFj too?
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •