Answer these true or false questions (comment too if you want):
__When typing individuals sometimes it is clear for me that the individual is an S type even if I do not know whether it is Si or Se. OR When typing people sometimes it is clear that they are an N type even if I don't know if it is Ne or Ni.
__When looking at N and S I do not notice N or S first and then later find out whether it is introverted or extroverted. The N or S is only known after the Si, Se, Ni, or Ne is apparent.
__When typing individuals sometimes their rationality or irrationality is very apparent.
__When typing individuals sometimes it is apparent that an individual is an F even if it's not obvious whether or not that F is Fe or Fi. Same for T.
__It is impossible to type someone by only using the four dichotomies.
__It is possible to type someone by using only the four dichotomies but things get tricky and more confusing that way.
__Using dichotomies is an effective tool for typing when used in conjuction with other typing tools such as looking at strength of functions.
__Superman is better than Batman
__The dichotomies are actually continuums and should be thought of that way.
__The dichotomies are definitely not continuums!
__Looking at temperment (EJ, IP, EP, IJ) is an effective tool for typing.